Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 1 - Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan for Community Consultation
The original of this document is very large (20.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnAppendix 5: Adaptation Options Multi-Criteria Analysis Assessment Criteria
Economic Impact Environmental Impact Social Impact Reversible / Adaptable Future Effectiveness
Whether an option is technically
feasible (i.e. is effective in mitigating
the risk and is implementable)
Order of magnitude monetary costs
Whether an adaptation option will Whether an option is able to be
to build/implement an adaptation Whether an adaptation option will
have adverse impacts on other social Whether an option is able to be readily approved (i.e. is consistent
option (further detailed studies to have adverse impacts on
Purpose values or is likely to have community ‘reversed’ or adapted to cater for with current planning policy or
confirm costs would be required), environmental values e.g. Matters
support e.g. access, amenity, property future needs legislative requirements)
either by Council or private land of State Environmental Significance
values Whether an option provides a long-
owners
term solution to the coastal hazard
risk, or is suitable for use as an
interim option
Score
Option provides short
term/temporary solution; or
Option is completely irreversible
Very Will have significant adverse Will significantly impact negatively once implemented; or Is not technically viable; or
Very High Economic Cost
Negative impact on environmental values on social values (i.e. access, Is very unlikely to achieve
(>$10M) Option limits any alternative
(-2) (i.e. MSES) amenity, loss of services) approval under existing
options in the future
planning/legislative
requirements
Option provides short-medium
term solution; or
Is only technically viable with
Option is difficult to reverse substantial engineering (or
Will have somewhat adverse, Will have somewhat adverse, but once implemented, but can be other) design investigation and
Negative High Economic Cost done with effort
but not significant impact on not significant impact on social capabilities for implementation;
(-1) Expensive ($3M to 10M)
environmental values values Option does limit some or
alternative options in the future Will require an EIS and/or Govt
program to implement; or
There is a residual risk that
approval will not be obtainable
Noosa Council – Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan 2020 - 2030 (community consultation version) Page 68
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.