Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 1 - Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan for Community Consultation
The original of this document is very large (20.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnPhase 4 – 5: Identifying assets of importance and their risks The next stage in the project was to identify which important Council, community and natural assets are likely to be exposed to each of the hazard scenarios, and then determine what the overall risks are to each. This stage of the project was performed in alignment with national standards for risk assessment. Identifying areas and assets at risk In order to assess the future erosion and inundation risks throughout the Noosa region, it is necessary to understand which areas and key assets are presently at risk and which areas may become threatened in the future. The 2040, 2070 and 2100 planning horizons are used to assess risk which provides insight into the urgency of adaptation planning. For instance, an asset which is threatened in 2040 may have more urgency for an adaptation response than an asset which is not expected to be at high risk until 2100. Contrastingly, assets with a long useful life (e.g. buildings and bridges) may require replacement or retrofitting significantly earlier than would have otherwise occurred (i.e. in the absence of sea level rise) to ensure their safety and functionality. By prioritising assets, Council is able to commit resources accordingly based on likely asset life, desired function (including safety), and vulnerability to coastal hazards. Assets were identified by comparing the hazard modelling results with existing data on public and private asset types and locations across the coastal zone. It’s important to acknowledge that not all assets require a specific response in this plan. For example, a single barbecue in a foreshore park is considered an asset, but given its low cost of replacement and relatively short life, it is not worth developing a specific response for. In contrast, the entire park itself is considered important, both from Council’s perspective (as it owns and manages that asset), as well as from the community’s viewpoint (as it provides recreational and economic benefits). Using a range of different criteria based on Council’s existing approach to asset management, and feedback provided by community stakeholders, a database of built assets, infrastructure, and natural areas that are considered most important to the community and/or Council was created. Further information on the results of this process can be found in the Locality Risk & Action Plans in Section 5. Identifying the level of risks to areas and assets A risk management approach has been applied to assessing all three coastal hazards risks. The Australian Standard for identifying and managing risks is outlined in AS/NZ ISO 31000:2018 Standard Risk Management Principles and Guidelines and this guideline has been applied in the performing of the risk assessment used in the CHAP’s development. This risk assessment approach has been designed to provide a process to incorporate improved data and risk knowledge over time. It provides an important basis for focusing effort and resources towards those assets or areas at greatest risk from coastal hazards now and in future (i.e. prioritising high risk areas and assets) and then determining responses that reduce these risks where feasible to an acceptable or tolerable level. It should be noted, that many assets for which a specific risk assessment was not performed are likely to still benefit from adaptation actions taken for those assets that were, due to their proximity to these. For example, foreshore works that seek to prevent inundation from impacting a park will also benefit the barbeque and playground facilities within the park. More descriptions of each of the criteria used can be found in Appendix 4. Noosa Council – Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan 2020 - 2030 (community consultation version) Page 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.