Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

FURTHER REPORT - CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS (ROUND 6) (referred from General Committee dated 9 June 2026 Item 7.14) · Report

of 7

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                       18 JUNE 2026


 12.2        FURTHER REPORT - CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE GRANTS (ROUND
             6) (referred from General Committee dated 9 June 2026 Item 7.14)


Author            Sustainability and Climate Change Coordinator, Shayan Barmand
                  Strategy & Sustainability | Strategy and Environment
Index             41.23 Climate Change
Attachments        1.   Ordinary Committee Report_Climate Change Grants 2026_Attachment
                        1


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the General Committee Meeting dated 9 June 2026 a report was presented providing an overview
of the applications received for the Environment Project Grants (Round 21) and the Climate Change
Response Grants (Round 6) to seek Council approval for the allocation of funding to recommended
projects.

Council requested that the matters be separated into two reports and brought back to the Ordinary
Meeting, with each grant detailed individually. This approach enables Councillors to declare a conflict
of interest, if required, in relation to one report only, and, where appropriate, remain in the meeting
for consideration of the other.

This further report recommends the allocation of the Climate Change Response Grants (Round 6)
only, to the successful applicants as detailed in the attached schedule. Minor amendments have
been made to the body of this report, including fixing a typographical error in the attachment.

RECOMMENDATION
That Council:
A. Note the report by the Environmental Services Manager to the General Committee Meeting dated
   9 June 2026 and the Further Report by the Sustainability and Climate Change Coordinator to the
   Ordinary Meeting dated 18 June 2026 regarding applications received for the Climate Change
   Response Grants (Round 6); and
B. Approve the allocation of funding, totalling $48,869.06, to the following organisations for the
   Climate Change Response Grants for FY2026/27:
         i. $14,820.00 to The Trustee for the Noosa Biosphere Reserve Trust for the Future Tide -
            2027 Noosa Youth Climate Summit;
         ii. $12,899.06 to Zero Emissions Noosa Inc. for the Swap the Drive: Supporting Modal Shift
             From Cars To Bikes program;
        iii. $11,150.00 to the Noosa Integrated Catchment Association Inc. for the Get Climate-
             ready with Noosa Native Plants project; and
        iv. $10,000 to Zero Emissions Noosa Inc. for the Solar on Low Income Homes project.


REPORT
Climate Change Response Grants
Noosa Council's Climate Change Response Grants aim to advance the implementation of the
Log in to download the original file

Report.pdf · 298 KB (small file)

Full text of the other 6 pages

Page 2

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                       18 JUNE 2026


Climate Change Response Plan, the Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan and the Regional Climate
Action Roadmap. Subject to budget outcomes, the current total FY26/27 budget for the Climate
Change Response Grants is $50,000.00. The Climate Change Response Grants are funded by
general rates and this is the sixth round of annual grant funding to date.

Nine applications were received for the current round for a funding request totalling $145,753.06,
and a total combined project value of $269,054.06. These figures illustrate the strong desire for
support from community as well as a willingness to co-invest in measures that reduce emissions
(which cause climate change) and adapt to growing climate change impacts by building resilience.
It is noted that the calibre of grants received in this round was strong and represented actions across
emissions reduction and adaptation. The projects all reflected well against the themes of the Climate
Change Response Plan.

In accordance with the Climate Change Grant Guidelines, each application was assessed against
the following criteria:




Applications were open from 9 February 2026 until 23 March 2026.

Promotion for the grant included:
•   Social media advertising
•   Specific email to all non-for-profit community groups previously applied for the grants or may be
    interested in applying for the grants
•   Direct conversations with NRM Groups, sustainability groups and community groups to ensure
    awareness
•   Details published on Noosa Council’s website
The grant required the applicant to engage with a relevant Council officer prior to submitting the
application.

This round introduced more robust governance enhancements to improve defensibility, objectivity
and transparency of the evaluation process. To ensure the integrity of the program, the assessment
methodology was executed in four phases:
•   Phase 1: Probity and Conflict of Interest (COI) Screening

Page 3

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                      18 JUNE 2026


        o   Upon receipt of applications, all assessing officers from the Strategy & Environment
            directorate completed mandatory COI declarations. To eliminate any real or perceived
            bias, officers with a declared COI, or those who had engaged with applicants prior to
            submission, were strictly excluded from the assessment process.

•   Phase 2: Technical Expert Review
        o   Before panel evaluation, subject matter experts conducted an initial technical appraisal
            of each application. This ensured all proposed projects were rigorously vetted for
            technical validity, execution capacity, quality, relevance, and risk management.

•   Phase 3: Cross-Disciplinary Panel Evaluation
        o   To maximise objectivity, independent three-member panels were established for each
            grant category, deliberately structured to include cross-branch representation. The
            Environment Project Grants panel comprised two Environment Services officers and
            one Strategy & Sustainability officer, while the Climate Change Response Grants panel
            reversed this ratio. Including an evaluator from outside the core subject area prevented
            siloing and provided independent, critical scrutiny.

•   Phase 4: Independent Scoring and Executive Moderation
        o   Panel members scored applications individually and independently against the
            established criteria. These scores were subsequently collated and subjected to a formal
            moderation review by leadership staff within the Strategy & Environment directorate to
            ensure scoring consistency, fairness, and alignment with strategic objectives.
Recommended Projects for Funding

Four projects have been recommended for funding based on a thorough assessment against the
evaluation criteria, community benefit and Council priorities. The funding request across the four
projects totals to $48,869.06. Staff have also identified a number of minor conditions that would be
required for each successful applicant to implement during project delivery, which would be included
in the notice of successful grant outcome. For further information regarding the applications and
individual funding recommended refer to details provided in Attachment 1.

Council staff will reach out individually to the five unsuccessful applicants in this program and work
with them on their projects to improve identified gaps in their applications and see how they can be
supported through other existing programs and opportunities to meet the need that has been
articulated.

Overall, most applications scored highly against the relevant grant criteria and Noosa Council was
grateful for the time invested by all applicants to apply for the Climate Change Response Grant.


Link to Corporate Plan
Theme No 1 - Environment
Focus areas include the natural environment, built environment, waterways and coasts and
conservation and heritage.
Objective 1.2 – Partner with landowners and community groups to manage, protect and regenerate
natural environment assets and improve resilience
Objective 1.3 - Fund and implement Coastal Foreshores and Coastal Hazard Management Plans
to protect and enhance coastal and foreshore areas.
Objective 1.5 – Deliver expanded vegetation networks, rehabilitation and habitat across the Shire
Objective 1.8 - Reinforce Noosa Design Principles to shape the look and feel of our distinctive built
environment to ensure it responds to our climate, environment and unique character.

Page 4

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                     18 JUNE 2026


Theme No. 2 - Liveability
Liveability encompasses housing, facilities and services, transport, health and wellbeing to enable
an inclusive, connected and vibrant community.
Objective 2.6 – Facilitate strong, vibrant and inclusive communities where people have a sense of
belonging and are active participants in community life
Objective 2.8 – Provide opportunities to enhance the health, wellbeing and safety of communities
Theme 3 - Prosperity
Focus areas include economic development, local business, innovation, arts and culture, waste and
a circular economy
Objective 3.3 - Work with agricultural organisations and agencies to support and educate
landholders on regenerative agriculture methods and promote local and sustainable food production
Objective 3.7 - Deliver the waste program focused on accelerating actions and solutions including
circular economy opportunities to cut waste and pollution, keep products and materials in use and
regenerate natural systems
Theme No. 4 - Future
This theme is focused on our future, strengthening our relationship with First Nations peoples and to
ensure our community is prepared and resilient to change. A focus on youth, climate resilience and
adaptation, sense of place and destination management.
Objective 4.7 – Fund and implement the Climate Change Response Plan to support Council,
community and the local economy to build resilience and preparedness for climate risks and to
achieve net-zero emissions by 2026.
Objective 4.8 – Deliver best practice approaches to combat and plan for natural disasters and
climate change including supporting safety, preparedness, resilience and recovery capacity.




Previous Council Consideration
Nil.


Finance
Funding for the recommended projects has been allocated in the draft versions of the FY2026/27
budget.
•      The Climate Change Response Grants Program is funded through general revenue, with a total
       allocation of $50,000 for this funding round.
The total funding recommended for allocation under this round is:
•      Climate Change Response Grants: $48,869.06
Projects recommended for funding represent a prioritisation of available funds and have been
selected to maximise community resilience, climate risk reduction and sustainability outcomes within
the approved budget. Given that funding requests significantly exceeded available allocations, not
all applications could be supported.


Risk & Opportunities
                                                                           Residual
                           Risk        Existing                                     Appetite
Risk Description                                          LikelihoodImpact Risk
                           Category    Controls                                     Compliance
                                                                           Rating

Risk that funded         Service       Application
applicants are unable to Delivery /    assessment          Unlikely   MediumMedium Yes
deliver agreed project   Financial /   criteria; pre-
outcomes due to          Reputation    application officer

Page 5

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                   18 JUNE 2026


insufficient capability or             engagement;
resources, resulting in                selection of
reduced environmental                  demonstrated
or community benefit                   capability; grant
                                       agreements and
                                       milestones
Risk of misallocation or               Funding
misuse of grant funding                agreements;
caused by inadequate Financial /       acquittal
financial controls within Legal /      requirements;    Unlikely      MediumMedium Yes
recipient organisations, Reputation    staged payments;
resulting in financial loss            monitoring and
or reputational impact                 reporting
Risk that funded projects
                                    Assessment
do not achieve intended
                                    against outcomes
climate outcomes due to Environment
                                    and feasibility;
poor project design or    / Service                   Possible        MediumMedium Yes
                                    officer guidance;
external factors,         Delivery
                                    monitoring and
resulting in reduced
                                    reporting
program effectiveness
                                       Formal
Risk of perceived lack of              assessment
transparency or fairness               criteria; panel
in grant allocation       Reputation / assessment;
                                                          Unlikely    MediumMedium Yes
process resulting in      Governance conflict of interest
reputational impacts and               declarations;
reduced community trust                documentation of
                                       decisions
Risk of conflicts of                  Mandatory COI
interest not being                    declarations;
                         Legal /
adequately identified or              exclusion of
                         Governance                        Rare       High   Medium Yes
managed, resulting in                 conflicted officers;
                         / Reputation
governance breach and                 governance
reputational damage                   oversight
Risk that high demand                   Transparent
for funding exceeds                     guidelines; clear
available budget,          Reputation / communication of
resulting in unsuccessful Service       limited funding; Likely       MediumHigh    Yes
applicants and potential Delivery       competitive
dissatisfaction within the              assessment
community                               process
Risk that funded climate
                                     Alignment criteria;
initiatives do not align
                                     officer
with broader Council
                          Governance engagement prior
strategies due to
                          / Service  to submission;      Unlikely     MediumMedium Yes
inconsistent
                          Delivery   panel review
interpretation, resulting
                                     against strategic
in reduced strategic
                                     documents
value
Risk that projects are  Service        Funding
delayed or not                         agreements;         Possible   MediumMedium Yes
                        Delivery
completed within agreed                project

Page 6

ORDINARY MEETING                                                                                 18 JUNE 2026


timeframes due to                            timeframes;
external factors                             progress
(weather, approvals,                         reporting;
staffing), impacting                         extension
delivery timelines                           provisions
Risk that climate
                                    Flexible project
conditions change (e.g.
                                    scope; adaptive
extreme weather events) Environment                                 Possible   MediumMedium Yes
                                    delivery; officer
impacting project viability
                                    support
or outcomes
Risk of administrative                       Established grant
burden on Council               People &     processes;
resources to manage             Culture /    standardised
                                                               Possible        Low      Low          Yes
and monitor grants,             Service      templates;
impacting internal              Delivery     experienced staff
service delivery                             management


Human Rights
Human Rights Compatibility Statement
In developing this Report, the subject matter has been considered in accordance with the
requirements of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019. It is considered that the subject matter
does not conflict with any human rights and supports a human rights approach to decision making
by Council. Council representatives will endeavour to act and make decisions under this report in a
manner that is compatible with human rights. This report should be read in conjunction with
Council’s Human Rights Policy.


Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Applicants were encouraged to consult with Council officers prior to submission to ensure project
alignment and eligibility. Advice and support were provided where required throughout the
application period.
Internal Consultation
Departments consulted:
     Office of the CEO, Mayor &               Community Services                     Corporate Services
             Councillors
 x    Mayor & Councillors                   Director                            Director
 x    Chief Executive Officer               Community Connection                Financial Services
      Executive Officers                    Sport & Active Lifestyles           Revenue Services
      Community Engagement                  Arts & Culture                      ICT
      Governance                            Customer Experience                 Procurement

                                                                                People & Culture
      Strategy & Environment                Development & Regulation             Infrastructure Services
 x    Director                              Director                            Director
 x    Strategy & Sustainability             Development Assessment              Civil and Asset operations
 x    Economic Development          &                                           Infrastructure Planning, Design
                                            Local Laws
      Destination Management                                                    and Delivery
 x    Environmental Services                Environmental Health                Waste

Page 7

ORDINARY MEETING                                                       18 JUNE 2026


    Innovation & Digital Hub   Building & Plumbing   Building & Facilities
    Commercial Property        Property / Permits    Disaster Management

                                                     Fleet

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.