Original source · versioned page text
sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Table 8.2.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Development in the erosion prone area
PO1 Development does not occur in the erosion No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposal is considered to comply with the
prone area unless the development: purpose of the Code and is consistent with the form of
1. is one of the following types of development: development that is located within the area.
a. coastal-dependent development; or
b. temporary, readily relocatable or able
to be abandoned; or
c. essential community infrastructure; or
d. redevelopment of an existing
permanent building or structure that
cannot be relocated or abandoned;
and
2. cannot feasibly be located elsewhere.
PO2 Development other than coastal protection work: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
1. avoids impacting on coastal processes; and from frontal coastal dunes.
2. ensures that the protective function of
landforms and vegetation is maintained.
Note: In considering reconfiguring a lot applications,
the state may require land in the erosion prone area
to be surrendered to the State for coastal
management purposes under the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.
Where the planning chief executive receives a copy of
a land surrender requirement or proposed land
surrender notice under the Coastal Protection and
Management Act 1995, this must be considered in
assessing the application.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 1 of 7
[OCR of page images]
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Table 8.2.1: All development
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)
Development in the erosion prone area
Acceptable outcomes
Response
PO1 Development does not occur in the erosion
prone area unless the development:
1. is one of the following types of development:
a. coastal-dependent development; or
b. temporary, readily relocatable or able
to be abandoned; or
c. essential community infrastructure; or
d. redevelopment of an existing
permanent building or structure that
cannot be relocated or abandoned;
and
2. cannot feasibly be located elsewhere.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
The proposal is considered to comply with the
purpose of the Code and is consistent with the form of
development that is located within the area.
PO2 Development other than coastal protection work:
1. avoids impacting on coastal processes; and
2. ensures that the protective function of
landforms and vegetation is maintained.
Note: In considering reconfiguring a lot applications,
the state may require land in the erosion prone area
to be surrendered to the State for coastal
management purposes under the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.
Where the planning chief executive receives a copy of
a land surrender requirement or proposed land
surrender notice under the Coastal Protection and
Management Act 1995, this must be considered in
assessing the application.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
from frontal coastal dunes.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 1 of 7
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 6 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO3 Development is located, designed and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposed lot is located as far as possible landward
constructed to minimise the impacts from coastal from the frontal dunes.
erosion by:
1. locating the development as far landward as
practicable; or
2. where it is demonstrated that 1 is not feasible,
mitigate or otherwise accommodate the risks
posed by coastal erosion.
PO4 Development does not significantly increase the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
risk or impacts to people and property from coastal from frontal coastal dunes.
erosion.
PO5 Development other than coastal protection work No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
avoids directly or indirectly increasing the severity of from frontal coastal dunes.
coastal erosion either on or off the site.
PO6 In areas where a coastal building line is present, No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable - no coastal building line
building work is located landward of the coastal
building line unless coastal protection work has been
constructed to protect the development.
Artificial waterways
PO7 Development of artificial waterways, canals and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no waterways of canals proposed
dry-land marinas minimises impacts on coastal
resources by:
1. maintaining the tidal prism volume of the
natural waterway to which it is connected
2. demonstrating a whole-of-life strategy for the
disposal of dredged material.
Coastal protection work
PO8 Works for beach nourishment minimise adverse No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no works proposed.
impacts on coastal processes and avoid any increase
in the severity of erosion on adjacent land by:
1. sourcing sand from an area that does not
adversely impact on the active beach system
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 2 of 7
[OCR of page images]
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)
PO3 Development is located, designed and
constructed to minimise the impacts from coastal
erosion by:
1. locating the development as far landward as
practicable; or
2. where it is demonstrated that 1 is not feasible,
mitigate or otherwise accommodate the risks
posed by coastal erosion.
Acceptable outcomes
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Response
Proposed lot is located as far as possible landward
from the frontal dunes.
PO4 Development does not significantly increase the
risk or impacts to people and property from coastal
erosion.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
from frontal coastal dunes.
PO5 Development other than coastal protection work
avoids directly or indirectly increasing the severity of
coastal erosion either on or off the site.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
from frontal coastal dunes.
PO6 In areas where a coastal building line is present,
building work is located landward of the coastal
building line unless coastal protection work has been
constructed to protect the development.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable - no coastal building line
Artificial waterways
PO7 Development of artificial waterways, canals and
dry-land marinas minimises impacts on coastal
resources by:
1. maintaining the tidal prism volume of the
natural waterway to which it is connected
2. demonstrating a whole-of-life strategy for the
disposal of dredged material.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no waterways of canals proposed
Coastal protection work
PO8 Works for beach nourishment minimise adverse
impacts on coastal processes and avoid any increase
in the severity of erosion on adjacent land by:
1. sourcing sand from an area that does not
adversely impact on the active beach system
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no works proposed.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 2 of 7
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. ensuring imported sand is compatible with
natural beach sediments and coastal
processes of the receiving beach.
PO9 Erosion control structures are only constructed No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no works proposed.
where there is an imminent threat to buildings or
infrastructure of value, and there is no feasible option
for either:
1. beach nourishment; or
2. relocation or abandonment of structures.
Statutory Note: The monetary value of buildings or
infrastructure should be more than the cost of
associated erosion control structures.
PO10 Erosion control structures minimise interference No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no works proposed.
with coastal processes, or any increase to the severity
of erosion on adjacent land by:
1. locating the erosion control structure as far
landward as practicable and directly adjacent
to the structure it is intended to protect
2. where required and feasible, importing sand
to the site to mitigate any increase in the
severity of erosion
3. the design of the structure.
Water quality
PO11 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposal able to comply
1. maintains or enhances environmental values
of receiving waters
2. achieves the water quality objectives of
Queensland waters
3. avoids the release of prescribed water
contaminants to tidal waters.
Note: See Environmental Protection (Water) Policy
2009 for the relevant water quality objectives.
Category C and R areas of vegetation
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 3 of 7
[OCR of page images]
rformance outcomes
2. ensuring imported sand is compatible with
natural beach sediments and coastal
processes of the receiving beach.
Acceptable outcomes
Response
PO$9 Erosion control structures are only constructed
where there is an imminent threat to buildings or
infrastructure of value, and there is no feasible option
for either:
1. beach nourishment; or
2. relocation or abandonment of structures.
Statutory Note: The monetary value of buildings or
infrastructure should be more than the cost of
associated erosion control structures.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no works proposed.
PO10 Erosion control structures minimise interference
with coastal processes, or any increase to the severity
of erosion on adjacent land by:
1. locating the erosion control structure as far
landward as practicable and directly adjacent
to the structure it is intended to protect
2. where required and feasible, importing sand
to the site to mitigate any increase in the
severity of erosion
3. the design of the structure.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no works proposed.
Water quality
PO11 Development:
1. maintains or enhances environmental values
of receiving waters
2. achieves the water quality objectives of
Queensland waters
3. avoids the release of prescribed water
contaminants to tidal waters.
Note: See Environmental Protection (Water) Policy
2009 for the relevant water quality objectives.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Proposal able to comply
Category C and R areas of vegetation
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 3 of 7
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO12 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – no mapped vegetation
1. avoids impacts on category C areas of
vegetation and category R areas of
vegetation; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category
C areas of vegetation and category R areas
of vegetation after demonstrating avoidance
is not reasonably possible.
Public use of and access to state coastal land
PO13 Development maintains or enhances public use No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – no impact on state coastal land
of and access to and along state coastal land (except
where this is contrary to the protection of coastal
resources or public safety).
PO14 Private marine development ensures that No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – not private marine development
works:
1. are used for marine access purposes only
2. minimise the use of state coastal land
3. do not interfere with access between
navigable waterways and adjacent properties.
PO15 Development ensures erosion control No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no erosion control structures
structures are located within the premises they are proposed
intended to protect unless there is no feasible
alternative.
Matters of state environmental significance
PO16 Development: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no mapped Matters of State
1. avoids impacts on matters of state Environmental Significance
environmental significance; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters
of state environmental significance after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably
possible; and
3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and
mitigation measures are undertaken, the
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 4 of 7
[OCR of page images]
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)
PO12 Development:
1. avoids impacts on category C areas of
vegetation and category R areas of
vegetation; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on category
C areas of vegetation and category R areas
of vegetation after demonstrating avoidance
is not reasonably possible.
Acceptable outcomes
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Response
Complies — no mapped vegetation
Public use of and access to state coastal land
PO13 Development maintains or enhances public use
of and access to and along state coastal land (except
where this is contrary to the protection of coastal
resources or public safety).
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Complies — no impact on state coastal land
PO14 Private marine development ensures that
works:
1. are used for marine access purposes only
2. minimise the use of state coastal land
3. do not interfere with access between
navigable waterways and adjacent properties.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — not private marine development
PO15 Development ensures erosion control
structures are located within the premises they are
intended to protect unless there is no feasible
alternative.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no erosion control structures
proposed
Matters of state environmental significance
PO16 Development:
1. avoids impacts on matters of state
environmental significance; or
2. minimises and mitigates impacts on matters
of state environmental significance after
demonstrating avoidance is not reasonably
possible; and
3. provides an offset if, after demonstrating all
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and
mitigation measures are undertaken, the
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no mapped Matters of State
Environmental Significance
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 4 of 7
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
development results in an acceptable
significant residual impact on a matter of state
environmental significance.
Statutory note: For Brisbane core port land, an offset
may only be applied to development on land identified
as E1 Conservation/Buffer, E2 Open Space or
Buffer/Investigation in the Brisbane Port LUP precinct
plan. For the Brisbane Port LUP, see
www.portbris.com.au.
Note: Guidance for determining if the development
will have a significant residual impact on the matter of
state environmental significance is provided in the
Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of
State Development, Infrastructure and Planning,
2014. Where the significant residual impact is
considered an acceptable impact on the matter of
state environmental significance and an offset is
considered appropriate, the offset should be delivered
in accordance with the Environmental Offsets Act
2004.
Table 8.2.2: All operational work
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Private marine development
PO17 Private marine development does not require No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no private marine development
the construction of coastal protection work, shoreline
or riverbank hardening or dredging for marine access
purposes.
Disposal of solid waste or dredged material from artificial waterways
PO18 Solid waste from land and dredged material No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no private marine development
from artificial waterways is not disposed of in tidal
water unless it is for beneficial reuse.
Disposal of dredged material other than from artificial waterways
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 5 of 7
[OCR of page images]
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)
development results in an acceptable
significant residual impact on a matter of state
environmental significance.
Statutory note: For Brisbane core port land, an offset
may only be applied to development on land identified
as E1 Conservation/Buffer, E2 Open Space or
Buffer/Investigation in the Brisbane Port LUP precinct
plan. For the Brisbane Port LUP, see
www.portbris.com.au.
Note: Guidance for determining if the development
will have a significant residual impact on the matter of
state environmental significance is provided in the
Significant Residual Impact Guideline, Department of
State Development, Infrastructure and Planning,
2014. Where the significant residual impact is
considered an acceptable impact on the matter of
state environmental significance and an offset is
considered appropriate, the offset should be delivered
in accordance with the Environmental Offsets Act
2004.
Acceptable outcomes
Response
Table 8.2.2: All operational work
Performance outcomes
Private marine development
Acceptable outcomes
Response
PO17 Private marine development does not require
the construction of coastal protection work, shoreline
or riverbank hardening or dredging for marine access
purposes.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no private marine development
Disposal of solid waste or dredged material from artificial waterways
PO18 Solid waste from land and dredged material
from artificial waterways is not disposed of in tidal
water unless it is for beneficial reuse.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no private marine development
Disposal of dredged material other than from artificial waterways
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 5 of 7
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO19 Dredged material is returned to tidal water No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no private marine development
where this is needed to maintain coastal processes
and sediment volume.
PO20 Where it is not needed to maintain coastal No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no dredging proposed
processes and sediment volume, the quantity of
dredged material disposed to tidal water is minimised
through beneficial reuse or disposal on land.
All dredging and any disposal of dredged material in tidal water
PO21 All dredging and any disposal of dredged No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no dredging proposed
material in tidal water is:
1. demonstrated to be safe with regard to
protection of the marine environment and by
meeting the National Assessment Guidelines
for Dredging 2009, Department of
Environment and Energy, 2009, or later
version; and
2. supported by a monitoring and management
plan that protects the marine environment
and that complies with the National
Assessment Guidelines for Dredging 2009,
Department of Environment and Energy,
2009, or later version.
Reclamation
PO22 Development does not involve reclamation of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable – no reclamation
land below tidal water, other than for the purposes of:
1. coastal-dependent development, public
marine development or community
infrastructure; or
2. strategic ports, priority ports, boat harbours or
strategic airports and aviation facilities, in
accordance with a statutory land use plan or
master plan, where there is a demonstrated
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 6 of 7
[OCR of page images]
aCe ae Mele Creu = t=)
PO19 Dredged material is returned to tidal water
where this is needed to maintain coastal processes
and sediment volume.
Acceptable outcomes
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Response
Not applicable — no private marine development
PO20 Where it is not needed to maintain coastal
processes and sediment volume, the quantity of
dredged material disposed to tidal water is minimised
through beneficial reuse or disposal on land.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no dredging proposed
All dredging and any disposal of dredged material in tidal water
PO21 All dredging and any disposal of dredged
material in tidal water is:
1. demonstrated to be safe with regard to
protection of the marine environment and by
meeting the National Assessment Guidelines
for Dredging 2009, Department of
Environment and Energy, 2009, or later
version; and
2. supported by a monitoring and management
plan that protects the marine environment
and that complies with the National
Assessment Guidelines for Dredging 2009,
Department of Environment and Energy,
2009, or later version.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no dredging proposed
Reclamation
PO22 Development does not involve reclamation of
land below tidal water, other than for the purposes of:
1. coastal-dependent development, public
marine development or community
infrastructure; or
2. strategic ports, priority ports, boat harbours or
strategic airports and aviation facilities, in
accordance with a statutory land use plan or
master plan, where there is a demonstrated
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Not applicable — no reclamation
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 6 of 7
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
net benefit for the state or region and no
feasible alternative exists; or
3. coastal protection work or work necessary to
protect coastal resources or coastal
processes.
Table 8.2.3: Operational work which is not assessed by local government
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO23 Works are located and designed such that they AO23.1 Tidal work is designed and located in Not applicable – no tidal works
continue to operate safely during and following a accordance with the Guideline: Building and
defined storm tide event. engineering standards for tidal works, Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection, 2017.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 7 of 7
[OCR of page images]
aCe ae Mele Creu = t=) Acceptable outcomes Response
net benefit for the state or region and no
feasible alternative exists; or
3. coastal protection work or work necessary to
protect coastal resources or coastal
processes.
Table 8.2.3: Operational work which is not assessed by local government
aCe ae Mele Creu = t=) Acceptable outcomes Response
PO23 Works are located and designed such that they
continue to operate safely during and following a
defined storm tide event.
AO23.1 Tidal work is designed and located in
accordance with the Guideline: Building and
engineering standards for tidal works, Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection, 2017.
Not applicable — no tidal works
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 7 of 7