Original source · versioned page text
sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Table 8.2.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Development in the erosion prone area
PO1 Development does not occur in the erosion No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The proposal is considered to comply with the
prone area unless the development: purpose of the Code and is consistent with the form of
1. is one of the following types of development: development that is located within the area.
a. coastal-dependent development; or
b. temporary, readily relocatable or able
to be abandoned; or
c. essential community infrastructure; or
d. redevelopment of an existing
permanent building or structure that
cannot be relocated or abandoned;
and
2. cannot feasibly be located elsewhere.
PO2 Development other than coastal protection work: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
1. avoids impacting on coastal processes; and from frontal coastal dunes.
2. ensures that the protective function of
landforms and vegetation is maintained.
Note: In considering reconfiguring a lot applications,
the state may require land in the erosion prone area
to be surrendered to the State for coastal
management purposes under the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.
Where the planning chief executive receives a copy of
a land surrender requirement or proposed land
surrender notice under the Coastal Protection and
Management Act 1995, this must be considered in
assessing the application.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works Page 1 of 7
[OCR of page images]
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Table 8.2.1: All development
a aCSIT- Lae meleicereitl-)
Development in the erosion prone area
Acceptable outcomes
Response
PO1 Development does not occur in the erosion
prone area unless the development:
1. is one of the following types of development:
a. coastal-dependent development; or
b. temporary, readily relocatable or able
to be abandoned; or
c. essential community infrastructure; or
d. redevelopment of an existing
permanent building or structure that
cannot be relocated or abandoned;
and
2. cannot feasibly be located elsewhere.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
The proposal is considered to comply with the
purpose of the Code and is consistent with the form of
development that is located within the area.
PO2 Development other than coastal protection work:
1. avoids impacting on coastal processes; and
2. ensures that the protective function of
landforms and vegetation is maintained.
Note: In considering reconfiguring a lot applications,
the state may require land in the erosion prone area
to be surrendered to the State for coastal
management purposes under the Coastal Protection
and Management Act 1995.
Where the planning chief executive receives a copy of
a land surrender requirement or proposed land
surrender notice under the Coastal Protection and
Management Act 1995, this must be considered in
assessing the application.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Proposed lot and future dwelling are located away
from frontal coastal dunes.
State Development Assessment Provisions — version 2.6
State code 8: Coastal development and tidal works
Page 1 of 7
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (sdap-v2-6-state-code-8 (1).pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.