07/2399 - MCU - Lot Reconfig & Detached Houses (27) [As Published] · 132007.2399

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997

Part A, Version 2.4, 29 May 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land owner's consent (if appiicabie) 20. Land owner's consent to the making of this applicatipa=== eee,
Section 3.2.1(3) of the IPA prescribes that an Name Y
appfication must contaln, of be supported by, the
written consent of the land owneris, if the application . .
involves: {i)  StarCo Holdings Pty Ltd
() améerialchangeofuse; = FE
(reconfiguration of a lot,
(i) work on land below high-water mark & not within a (ii)
canal as defined under the Coastal Protection and} fees
Management Act 1995.0 ves
(1) work on rail corridor land defined under the (ii)
Transport infrastructure Act 1998.0 Pee eee eee
Section 3.8.1(2}(a) of the IPA provides that .
tandowner's consent is pot required for a mobile of (iv)
femooravERA© ene ee een ee eee eee eee ee eee cence eee
For more information refer to Guide 4, (v)
Resource entitlement (if eppiicable) 21. Does this application involve a State resource prescribed under a regulation (other than involving
Section 3.2.1(5) of the IPA requires evidence of quarry material on State coastal land under the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995)?
resource entitlement be given for applications that co
involve a prescribed State resources. NO - goto Q24 O YES - go to Q22
Section 3.2.1(1 IPA prescribes th . os . .
Soy ate hee ete eaystas” 122. This application is accompanied by evidence: (tick applicable box)
Without avidence of the resource entitlement. (i) of the allocation of, or entitlement to, the resource - attach evidence and go to 023(v)
Rater to schedule 10 of the Integrated Planning O (ii) the chief executive of the department administering the resource is satisfied the
Reguteton 1968 thet prescribes the nature of evidence is consistent with an allocation i roe -
racic bythe Stet a suppl ofthe, Bdsog of the development nt with an al of, or entitlement to, the resource - go
development application. - . . .. . . .

CO (iii) the chief executive of the department administering the resource is satisfied the
development application in the absence of an allocation of, or
entitlement to, the resource ~ go to Q23

Advice for completing 023 23. Evidence of the resource entitlement:
gman oO & mandatory It evidence (i) Resource entitlement / authority details (vii) Official stamp of the department
The official stamp of the Department of Natural administering the resource (f
Resources, Mines and Water is mandatory where the i. applicable)
application involves any water or riverine quarry (ii) Name of delegated officer
Section 3,2.1(5A) aflows the resource mae to Imit
the time the evidence may be used. Q23 (vi) must be tii iti
camped the idence bre tos (iii) Position of “aes officer

(v) Date

(vi) pen date of evidence a
Assessment triggers 24. Is the IDAS Assessment Checklist completed and attached to this application?
dooumpbibn, rae apo he aoe raion os Kl Yes (NO - the assessment manager may refuse to accept this application on the
must be completed for alloter applications, grounds that the application has not been properly made
Plans / drawings / reports 25. Plans/drawings/reports accompanying this application:
An application should be accompanied by detalls to : q
support the proposal & enable the assessment Plan / Drawing / Report Number Title Date
manager, referral agencies and any person viewing
the application during public scrutiny of public Development Proposal Report
‘notification to understand the scope of the proposal (i) Noosa Springs - Precinct J with attached drawings and Nov 2007
and any patential impact. reports

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLEASE NOTE: The assessment manager may refuse to accept an application that, at the time of lodgement, fails to provide all applicable information required by Part A
and any other retevant part of Form 1.

 

OFFICE USE ONLY (applicable to assessment manager's)

 

DATE

| Fee ®) RECEIVED

[es7/2394 |

[Sie PSPS Fa