Council archive · source document
07/2399 - Referral Agency Response - DNRW (Concurrence & Advice) [As Published] · 132007.2399
If the disturbance of ASS cannot be avoided, the potential impacts of that disturbance must be treated and managed to: e neutralise existing acidity and prevent the generation of acid and metal contaminants; and e avoid releasing surface or groundwater flows containing acid and metal contaminants into the environment. The following advice is offered on whether the application demonstrates that the proposed development can achieve Outcome 1 of SPP 2/02. . Background ASS mapping’ shows part of the site in an area mapped as likely t to contain ASS, with the remainder low probability. Geology mapping shows the site as quaternary coastal wetlands. Surface elevations range from 1.5m to 9m AHD. The planning reports states that excavations below 5m AHD are not anticipated, however they are not able to rule this out due to exact details only being known once Council have approved and conditioned the application. Accordingly, they request that preparation of an ASSMP be imposed as a condition. The Engineering Report states that filling of the south west corner of the site will be required, with minimal earthworks in the remainder of the site to provide the cut to fill earthworks for the new roadworks profile, and infrastructure trenching. A lake appears to be proposed as part of the realignment of the 18" tee. ASS Investigation Report The following advice is offered on the preliminary ASS investigation undertaken iby Golder Associates and dated October 2007. NRW notes that the report is preliminary due to details of the proposed earthworks and buildings were not known at the time of reporting. The ASS investigation revealed the presence of ASS in the southwest corner of the site. With respect to SPP 2/02 and related guidelines’, the ASS investigation is deficient in the following areas: e the number of boreholes — 2 were tested as part of the ASS investigation - instead of 6; e the number of samples analysed - 6 in the two boreholes, instead of 6 per borehole. NRW support the proposal to drill 4 additional boreholes once more detailed information is available on the proposed development. In order for the ASS investigation to be consistent with SPP 2/02 and related guidelines, NRW recommend further ASS investigations which address the deficiencies detailed above. ‘ Acid Sulfate Soils - Tweed Heads to Nerang River. NR&M, 2003 > NR&M & DLGP, (2002) State Planning Policy 2/02 Guideline Ahern CR, Ahern MR and Powell 8 (1998). Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) in Queensland. Department of Natural Resources, Indooroopilly. Ahern CR, McElnea AE and Sullivan LA (2004). Acid Sulfate Soils Laboratory Methods Guidelines. In Queensland Acid Sulfate Soils Technical Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Indooroopilly. Dear SE, Moore NG, Dobos SK, Watling KM and Ahern CR (2002). Soil Management Guidelines. In Queensiand Acid Sulfate Soils Technical Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Indooroopilly. Dear SE, Moore NG, Watling KM, Fahl D and Dobos SK (2004). Legislation and Policy Guide. In Queensiand Acid Sulfate Soils Technical Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Indooroopilly, The Department of Natural Resources and Water ICO108NAM0002 . 20f5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
07/2399 - Referral Agency Response - DNRW (Concurrence & Advice) [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 284 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.