Original source · versioned page text
Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail REC16/0014 - Planning report & supporting management plans, contour plan 2 of 2.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnBushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan – v2 NCES REF: ELK 2016-04 Lot 70 on M37807 – 28 Elkhorn Drive, Tewantin 4.0 RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The level of bushfire hazard risk acting on the site was assessed in accordance with the methodology prescribed in PSP1 of the Noosa Plan which specifies the assessment be undertaken in accordance with the now repealed Appendix 3 of the State Planning Policy 1/03 Guideline: Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide Several investigative tools were utilized to determine the site specific bushfire hazard risk including: Review of local aerial photography, Review of site and local topography, Review of DNRM’s Vegetation Management Support Map, and Inspection of the site in May 2016. 4.1 Appendix 3 of the State Planning Policy 1/03 Guideline: Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide Appendix 3 of SPP 1/03 utilizes a scoring system to assess bushfire risk based on three loading factors: vegetation type, site aspect and slope. The total of all three loading factors is used to determine a site’s severity of bushfire hazard. 4.1.1 Topography / Slope Physical conditions such as slope and terrain can influence important fire behaviour characteristics such as wind speed and direction, and the rate of spread of fire. Fire is known to double its rate of spread with each 10% increase in slope, up to 30% (Webster 2000). Slope also has the effect of ‘tipping’ a flame to an acute angle as it travels upslope, which brings a flame, and fire front, closer to unburnt vegetation. As a result, tipping facilitates the preheating of vegetation and can make vegetation combust and burn quicker (Webster 2000). Therefore, it is desirable to locate developments within bushfire prone areas on terrain which will not significantly accelerate/intensify fire behaviour (i.e. steep slopes). Table A3.2: Hazard score for slope has been directly extracted from SPP1/03 and depicts the hazard scores relevant to slope influence. 4.1.2 Aspect Sites with west to north aspects are considered at greatest risk to potential bushfire impacts, given their direct frontage to hot and dry northerly to westerly winds most commonly associated with bushfire outbreaks. Table A3.2: Hazard score for aspect has been directly extracted from SPP1/03 and depicts © 2016 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.