Original source · versioned page text
Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail REC16/0014 - Planning report & supporting management plans, contour plan 2 of 2.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnBushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan – v2 NCES REF: ELK 2016-04 Lot 70 on M37807 – 28 Elkhorn Drive, Tewantin 5.3.2 Quantitative Modelling Quantitative modelling of the potential bushfire conditions that may be experienced within the vegetation fronting the eastern site boundary has been undertaken to assist in quantifying the potential risk of impact to the proposed development. The models used comprise industry standard bushfire equations. 5.3.2.1 Site Specific Input Parameters Slope = 5º inclining toward site FDI = 50 (Sunshine Coast) Surface Fuel Load = 12 t/ha, Total Fuel Load = 16 t/ha (Source: Derived from onsite Fuel Load Assessment for VU2 – See Section 5.3.1) 5.3.2.2 Formulae Rate Spread (R) R = 0.0012 *FDI*w *exp (0.069*slope) (Noble et al. 1980) Where: R = rate of spread (km/hr) FDI = Fire Danger Index W = surface fuel load (t/ha), Slope = slope of the land with vegetation (degrees) Fire Intensity I = H*W*R/36 (Byram 1959) Where: I = fire intensity (kW/m) H = heat of combustion (kJ/kg), approximated as 18,600 kJ/kg R = rate of spread (km/hr) W = overall fuel loads (t/ha), Flame Length Lf = (13R+0.24W)/2 (RFS PBP 2001) Where: Lf = flame length (m) R = rate of spread (km/hr) W = overall fuel loads (t/ha), 5.3.2.3 Modelled Output (R) = 0.0012 x FDI (50) x Surface Fuel Load (12) x exp (0.069 x slope (5)) = 1.01km/hr (I) = 18600kj/kg x 16 x 1.01 / 36 = 8.349 kW/m Lf = (13 x 1.01 + 0.24 x 16)/2 = 8.48m The results illustrate that the identified Medium hazard vegetation along the eastern boundary of the site represents potential to exhibit moderate severity bushfire conditions at the time of assessment. Flame length results infer sufficient flame heights could be output to facilitate a crown fire within the open eucalypt forest vegetation. It is noted a slope of 5⁰ was selected as the slope input parameter and that a fire burning along the river bank would predominantly burn across the contour which is equivalent to near flat conditions. A five-degree slope increases forward rate of spread by 30% which would have a corresponding significant influence upon the fire intensity and flame length output results. Therefore, the output results are considered somewhat exaggerative. Wind velocities, atmospheric conditions, and time since last fire would also affect bushfire behaviour, either increasing or decreasing potential bushfire severity. © 2016 15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.