Original source · versioned page text
Ecological Assessment Report
Ecological Assessment Report v2 NCES REF: LEA2016-06 Lot 496 on MCH591 - 30 Pottery Street, Pomona Evidence of past koala habitation was observed in the west of the site in the form of scratch marks on existing Eucalypt trees. The vegetation to be cleared to accommodate the development contains suitable habitat for koalas, however the proposed volume and composition of clearing is not anticipated to significantly impact food or habitat resources for the species in this locality. The site is positioned on the eastern edge of a larger unit of suitable koala habitat, including that contained within the Tuchekoi National Park. Removal of a small amount of koala habitat from the fringe of this large vegetation unit would be unlikely to be considered a significant impact under the EPBC Act. Whilst one record of the regent honeyeater was identified in the Wildlife online database, it relates to a specimen observed in 1998 from Yurol State Forest (Atlas Living Australia). In general, regent honeyeater records are more common in south-east Australia, with very few records within south-east Queensland. The likelihood of the regent honeyeater utilising the site or the local corridor is therefore expected to be remote. Several large arboreal hollows were observed within the western central extent of the site within mature Eucalyptus pilularis (blackbutt) individuals which may constitute suitable breeding habitat for the Greater Glider. Several habitat trees front the proposed Lot F clearing footprint including trees 4-6 which represent the most likely candidates to support greater gliders based on available hollow diameters. Habitat trees 4-8 have been captured in the proposed covenant area to ensure their protection whilst the building positions on Lots D & F have been selected to negate the need to clear habitat trees 1-3. Therefore, the existing potential nesting opportunities for greater gliders on the site are expected to be retained under the proposal. The existing foraging and supporting habitat currently occupying the clearing footprint is however expected to be unsuitable to host greater gliders post development. Sufficient supporting habitat will be retained in the wests of the site and further afield to continue to support any local glider populations. The development is therefore not expected to generate a significant impact to greater gliders at the locality. Listed Migratory Species The EPBC Act Protected Matters Report lists 1 migratory marine bird, 2 migratory wetland birds, and 6 terrestrial migratory bird species for which either breeding and/or foraging habitat is known, likely or may occur in the area. There are no wetlands with the site therefore the proposed development is not expected to impact wetland migratory bird species. The site may provide suitable habitat for the listed marine migratory species, Apicus pacificus. This species is known to frequent disturbed and even settled areas hence the proposal is unlikely to impact this species. The habitat present within the site is considered to be generally suitable for numerous listed terrestrial migratory bird species. Development of the site requires vegetation clearing and therefore has the potential to impact upon migratory species. The primary impacts related to migratory species are in the form of potential injury or death, temporary habitat disturbance, the limited loss of foraging resources and possible breeding locations. In general, the vegetation communities on site are well represented within the remainder of the site and within the surrounding locality. Therefore, the removal of limited vegetation associated with marginal habitat is unlikely to impact the sustainability of breeding capacity of any of the listed migratory bird species. The employment of a spotter catcher during clearing activities can be expected to minimise the risk of physical injury to migratory bird species at the site during vegetation clearing. The applicant is legally obliged under the EPBC Act to demonstrate that reasonable measures have been undertaken to identify the presence of any listed flora and/or fauna on the site prior to vegetation clearing. The granting of a Council Development Permit does not absolve the applicant of this responsibility. © 2017 22
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Ecological Assessment Report.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.