Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Natalie Ferrigno

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

4. NON COMPLIANCE WITH RELEVANTPLANNING INSTRUMENTS:

The Applicant has completely failed to address the numerous and significant potential impacts of the
proposed Development on the adjoining School. The following     specific areas of non-compliance      are
noted:


 Code Objective                  Developer's Assessment         Objectors' Assessment

 RECONFIGURINGA LOT CODE

 09 The subdivision layout is    09 Complies:                   Does not Comply
 designed to facilitate          The proposal will comply       The phrase "reasonably applicable" is
 linkages with adjoining sites   where reasonably applicable.   unclear and the specific linkages with
 in the immediate area.                                         adjoining sites in the immediate area
                                                                have not been considered or
                                                                adequately addressed.

 010 Where the lots are to be    010 Complies:                  Does not Comply
 used for Industrial business    Landscaped buffering has       The layout does not provide for
 or Commercial business          been provided along all        appropriate buffer areas, to mitigate
 uses, the layout provides for   boundaries adjoining the       possible impacts on the adjacent
 appropriate buffer areas, to    school to the east.            School.
                                                                  .     Landscape buffering. is
 mitigate possible impacts on                                   insufficient and ineffective to mitigate
 nearby residences or other                                     the negative impacts, including those
 noise sensitive uses                                           of fugitive emissions, of the
                                                                Development.

 012 An adequate and             S12.1- 12.2 Complies           Does not Comply
 accessible water supply is      Will comply as applicable.     The Applicant has not adequately
 provided for fire fighting                                     addressed the issue of fire safety and
 purposes.                                                      its potential impacts, particularly
                                                                given the proximity of the
                                                                Development to the adjacent School.

 032 Access easements are in     S32.1 Complies                 Does not Comply
 appropriate locations for       It is considered that the      The proposed access is not
 safe access and egress, and     proposed access easement       appropriate for the Development and
 supply appropriate widths       has been designed in           does not provide safe access and
 and levels of service for the   accordance with Sections 2     egress nor does it provide for the
 number of vehicles that will    and 3 of PSPSEngineering       appropriate level of safety of school
 utilise them                    Design Standards - Roads,      children given its proximity to the
                                 Drainage and Earthworks.       School

 033 Traffic generated by the    S33.1 Complies                 Does not Comply
 development is within the       The development will comply    "reasonably applicable" is
 acceptable capacity of          where reasonably applicable.   indeterminate.   The proposed
 external roads and does not                                    Development does have an adverse
 have an adverse impact                                         impact upon the functioning of the
 upon the functioning of the                                    road network. The Applicant has



                                                                                                        12

Used in these records

About this file

File size
9.4 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Natalie Ferrigno.pdf · 9.4 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.