Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

35484 Approved Plans Ba · MCU21/0222.01

of 105

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Very large file (18.3 MB): may take a few minutes to open.

Log in to see the plans as drawn

Original PDF page 71, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

HAZARD MITAGATION — CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATION:

We consider the primary risks for landslip occurring within this allotment is over excavation or, stormwater scour
and vegetation removal.

The construction of any cut/fill platforms within the site can lead to an increased risk of landslip.

Any over excavated (steep) cuts may lead to landslip. Similarly, steep fill batters may be susceptible to slip or
erosion.

Any exposed fill batters are susceptible to weakening from saturating rains and stormwater scour. This risk is
compounded, where poor compaction is achieved when placing the fill. Any fill batter profiles should be limited
to a maximum grade of 1 to 3 (vertical to horizontal). Where possible the fill platform should be benched into the
natural profile after the removal of all organic material including topsoils. The fill material should be placed and
compacted to achieve a minimum relative field density of 98%. Surface stormwater runoff should be diverted
around fill batters. Vegetating the fill batter can improve the batters ability to resist slip and or scour. Where
these recommendations are unachievable, benching, shoring or retaining measures should be implemented.

Any permanent exposed cut batters should be limited to a maximum slope of 1 to 3 (vertical to horizontal). The
face should be protected from stormwater scour with cut off drains above the cut. Catch drains should also be
provided along the base of the cut. The drains must dissipate all stormwater from above and below the cut.
Vegetating the cut batter can improve the batters ability to resist slip and scour. Steeper batters should be
retained with engineer designed retaining walls.

All excavations both temporary and permanent must be adequately battered or retained to prevent collapse.
Temporary excavations for retaining walls can have exposed cut batters of 1 to 1.7 (vertical to horizontal) taken
from the base of the excavation. These earthworks must incorporate shallow surface spoon drains at the base
and along the high side of the cut. Drains must have an efficient outflow down-slope and clear of the construction
area. Any exposed soil face should also be protected against the potential for stormwater erosion. Saturation of
the exposed cut batter from prolonged rainfall will potentially de-stabilise the cut batter. Programming of the
works must consider this possibility. Temporary back propping of the slope may be required. Should these
recommendations be un-achievable the builder should seek guidance from this office on temporary shoring,
benching or other suitable techniques.

For the basement construction it is anticipated that battering is not likely to be suitable, bulk excavation will
therefore require positive support such as contiguous concrete piling. The design and certification of temporary
retention walls should be specifically designed and installed by a specialist Contractor and should consider the
protection of all neighbouring structures from movement and vibration damage. It is strongly recommended a
delapidation report of all neighbouring structures is undertaken prior to works commencing.

The allotment will support a typical form of residential construction. Structural foundations should be designed
by a competent person in accordance with AS 2870, accepted engineering theory and the geotechnical conditions
reported by SCG Consulting Engineers.

All earthworks should be constructed in accordance with AS3798-1996 ‘Guidelines on earthworks for commercial
and residential developments’ and sound engineering theory.

The builder must ensure the stability of neighbouring structures is maintained through not undermining
their foundations. This is achieved via restricting any earthworks to above a line radiating downwards
at an angle of 1 in 1.7 (vertical to horizontal) from the base of the foundation/structure to be protected.

The proposed method of construction is for a suspended concrete multi-storey dwelling with a suspended
swimming pool. Due to the excessive loads expected and differential foundation materials it is recommended the
proposed dwelling is supported on deep foundations such as screw piles as recommended in SCG Consulting
Engineers soil test and footing report, (No. 32027(S)). Deep foundations should be designed by a specialist
contractor in accordance with AS2159:2009 — “Piling Design and Installation’.

Retaining walls for landscaping purposes would need to be constructed with consideration of maintaining stability
of the surrounding ground during construction. Such measures would include limiting the slope of any
excavations to a slope of 1 vertical to 1.7 horizontal and protecting the works against stormwater scour. The
retaining wall designs must allow for the lateral soil pressures expected including additional surcharging from
sloping backfills.

SCG Consulting Engineers 4 SCG Ref: 32027(SL)

Used in these records

About this file

File size
18.3 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

35484 APPROVED PLANS BA.pdf · 18.3 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.