Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Response to SEQ Water advice

Attached to the e-mail Response to SEQ Water Third Party Advice - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133.

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Wednesday, 19 October, 2016

Our Ref:       16161 / Office: Sunshine Coast
SEQ Water Ref: CE:DB F16/3997
Council Ref:   MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133



           SEQ WATER
           PO BOX 16146
           BRISBANE CITY EAST QLD 4002

           Via email: [email protected]

           ATTENTION: David Brown


Dear Sir

RESPONSE TO THIRD PARTY ADVICE
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR RETAIL BUSINESS TYPE 2 SHOP &
SALON, RETAIL BUSINESS TYPE 5 VEHICLE USES AND ENTERTAINMENT AND DINING BUSINESS
TYPE 1 FOOD & BEVERAGE

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR OPERATIONAL WORK (ADVERTISING SIGNAGE)

6 TAYLOR COURT, COOROY
LOT 3 SP197517

Further to SEQ Water’s Third Party Advice dated 23 August 2016 we now respond to each of the items
raised.

1.   In accordance with the Seqwater Development Guidelines, development is to ensure that
     stormwater is of a quality that is fit for purpose as drinking water supply. Seqwater recommends
     that the applicant demonstrate that the reduction in pollutant load calculations can achieve the
     relevant Water Quality Objectives identified in the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009. It
     is recommended that the applicant specifically state the annual rainfall assumptions uses in the
     calculations. It is further recommended that any stormwater management plan be signed off by a
     Registered Professional Engineer Queensland (RPEQ).

Response
Covey Associates provide the following response:

In response to the Stormwater Management items requested by Seqwater we have included the
following information within the Stormwater Management Plan. The MUSIC modelling rainfall data
used to model pollutant reduction targets is from Cooroy Composite Station 1973 to 1983 as this is
the most continuous dataset available. The annual rainfall for each year has been included within the
SWMP as requested. Refer to Table 3: Annual Rainfall in the report.

The report demonstrates that the measures proposed to reach the WQOs identified in the
Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009. The proposed measures significantly exceeded the
required pollutant reduction targets by State Planning Policy and Noosa Shire Council to ensure the
best possible change of meeting the WQOs and prevent any potential adverse impacts on Lake
Macdonald. The daily loads estimated in MUSIC for TSS and TN are mean values and only marginally
Log in to download the original file

Response to SEQ Water advice.pdf · 134 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

over the WQOs due to the low concentration of the remnant pollutants. There is no practical or
reasonable way to address the remaining concentrations. The report has been signed off by an RPEQ.

2.   The proposal involves in-ground storage of fuels which present a risk to groundwater
     contamination. The proposal does not detail the tank details or leak detection measures to ensure
     that surface and groundwater will not be adversely impacted. In accordance with Element 6 of the
     Seqwater Development Guidelines, any proposal involving the storage of fuels should be
     accompanied by a report prepared by a suitably qualified and experience chemical engineer or
     similar as outlined in Measure 28.1. Additional considerations are also outlined in Element 6.

     Note: Brisbane City Council’s City Plan also provides suitable requirements for in-ground tanks
     (SC6.28 Storage and dispending of petroleum products planning scheme policy).

Response
The applicant owns the land and is intending to either sell or lease the land to a service station
operator (at this stage, the operator is unknown). This operator will presumably have preferred fuel
tank designs and detection measures which we are not privy to at this stage. To address SEQ Water’s
concern, the applicant will accept a condition which requires the submission of tank details and leak
detection measures to SEQ Water for approval prior to the submission of the first Operational Works
application for the proposal. This would bind future operators and provide certainty for SEQ Water
that surface and groundwater will not be adversely impacted.

Should you have any questions with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me direct.

Yours faithfully
PROJECT URBAN




John McKennariey
Associate
Email: [email protected]

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.