Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Scan

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission Object - Maureen Harmony & Dylan Battilana - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041.

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

FiLE meu (6/153 REC Ib JODL. | Naren ee

\

Points of Concern for Submission Writing — Scanlon Development Proposal
1)Material Change of use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy our point of
difference & the attraction of our village to holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity that
was the real essence of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping.

2)No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with majority of the accommodation proposed for
Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor
accommodation for the growing needs of the local community. Peregian Beach is already surrounded by
new small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle.

3)Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St
renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation
process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased useage.

4)The Development’s impact on the creek & wetland, both during construction & upon completion is of
great concern, as is the planned density of housing in this ecologically sensitive reserve & adjacent National
Park. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at
least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low way, down
Sandpiper Lane, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout.

5) Significant continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, PB Hotel,
Hardware store, business & private premises in the vicinity of the roadways & roundabout guaranteed.

6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further
during school! & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional
congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future.

7)Diminished vistas across the National Park to Mt Cooroy due to bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected
heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views are
maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by nature!’

8)Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public
access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance or a non
threatening environment, particularly at night.

9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan
for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north western corner’s existing
vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors &
local community with potential to make connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development
instead it separates itself from the village feel.

*

10)This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this

relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable

urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village °
character & community engagement.

| urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian Beach & to refuse this DA.
Log in to download the original file

Scan.pdf · 3.5 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

Full text of the other 5 pages

Page 2

 

<

c— | Notice of Submission under the
4 M Sustainable Planning Act 2009
¥ .

‘

To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that:

be made to the assessment manager

be in writing

be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission
state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

be received by Council during the formal public notification period

As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council’s website and
therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly
made.

foe » Ye

 

File No:
Postal address of Laid. (as advertised) 215 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH

 

 

Nature of Proposed Development MULTIPLE HOUSING —TYPE 4 CONVECTIONAL, VISITOR ACCOMODATION

 

Full name of Submitter Dy <A A) BATTILAIVA

 

 

 

EmailAddress _ oDntra Date Lr nn @ homna lL. enn
Postaladdress (0 Ao 2ULY
Suburb Pyro eo Vacugt [State Q4/ [Postcode Ys 7

 

 

 

x | Signature(s) \ Me - K \ <5
N.B. This form has been designed for the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form.

3. Details of Submission

| (We), make the following submission: _ ,

Leone witdesk 12. Ln DA Gad. ct ’ halt BEG oly
arpordt Bry vZb hnroksae L_'noc4e: por! an Bevwist Leh
Sol oil erent Mog =e - ai a TF

ay £2 ea Yo Alas Z Foon LAr ow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Porno satefuiate >.

Dd

 

 

 

 

 

 

| (if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Goverment Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy.

www.noosa.ald.qov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565 | ABN 97 969 214 121

Page 3

Mev fe [1S 3 REC 16 / #04 7 LISI BATTILANA

oncern for Submission Writing — Scanlon Development Proposal
1)Matgrial Change of use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy our point of
difference & the attraction of our village to holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity that
was the real essence of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping.

2)No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with majority of the accommodation proposed for
Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor
accommodation for the growing needs of the local community. Peregian Beach is already surrounded by
_ new small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle.

3)Setbacks ing | & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St
Sutfently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation
‘eeactivate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased useage.

  
  

4)The Develpinent’ s impact on the creek & wetland, both during construction & upon completion is of
great concern, as is the planned density of housing in this ecologically sensitive reserve & adjacent National
Park. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at
least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low way, down
Sandpiper Lane, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout.

5) Significant continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, PB Hotel,
Hardware store, business & private premises in the vicinity of the roadways & roundabout guaranteed.

6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further
during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional
congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future.

7)Diminished vistas across the National Park to Mt Cooroy due to bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected
heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views are
maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by nature!”

8)Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public
access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance or a non
threatening environment, particularly at night.

9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan
for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north western corner’s existing
vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors &
local community with potential to make connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development
instead it separates itself from the village feel.

10)This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this
relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable
urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village
character & community engagement.

\/y-urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian Beach & to refuse this DA.

Swi fr \ Yy <S

Page 4

    

Notice of Submission under the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009

A COUNCIL

 

hem NCOTOS

‘Feensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that.
4. be made to the assessment manager

2. be in writing

3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically
4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission

5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why

6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period

As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council’s website and
therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly
made.

    

1. Applicatior

File No: MCU yy ¥

Postal address of Laing (as advertised) 215 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH

Nature of Proposed Development MULTIPLE HOUSING —TYPE 4 CONVECTIONAL, VISITOR ACCOMODATION

=~

 

 

 

2. Submitter details

Full name of Submitter Mic ME LCE HaRmMaoe NY __|

 

 

 

 

Email Address mharwory le) higponols con Qi
Postaladdress 9) Bau Sy OC"
Suburb Paneren Benst, [state Qu// [Postcode (73 :

 

Signatures) ) - Lipgmaonsd

N.B. This form has been designed for theedhvenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form.

 

 

 

 

| (We), make the following submission:

 

(if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)

 

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy.

www.noosa.ald.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qid 4565 | a 5s ABN 97 969 214 121

Page 5

< MeV 1efis 3 KE cpefeoy é Mechelle. ees

‘

j
f Powis of Concern for Submission Writing — Scanlon Development Proposal
1)Material Change of use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy our point of
difference & the attraction of our village to holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity that
was the real essence of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping.

2)No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with majority of the accommodation proposed for
Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor
accommodation for the growing needs of the local community. Peregian Beach is already surrounded by
new small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle.

3)Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway in particular, impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St
renewal tly in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation
process i ivate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased useage.

ae

4)The ee ee impact on the creek & wetland, both during construction & upon completion is of
great concern, as is the planned density of housing in this ecologically sensitive reserve & adjacent National
Park. Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at
least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low way, down
Sandpiper Lane, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout.

5) Significant continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, PB Hotel,
Hardware store, business & private premises in the vicinity of the roadways & roundabout guaranteed.

6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further
during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional
congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future.

7)Diminished vistas across the National Park to Mt Cooroy due to bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected
heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views are
maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by nature!’

8)Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public
access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance or a non
threatening environment, particularly at night.

9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan
for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north western corner’s existing
vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors &
local community with potential to make connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development
instead it separates itself from the village feel.

10)This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this

relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable «
urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village
character & community engagement.

|/we urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian Beach & to refuse this DA.

Page 6

 

Notice of
Sustainable

address of each person who ma
ed development your support or op}

al public notification period

 

 

 

   

Miatcimelsiccliy

|Full name of Submitter Ci/g1S 7? Bt! BATT AN
Email Address ¢/watianhadthane @ Fo Miomacke 1 ee

Postaladdress (0 (25 ¢ 2 ¢

Suburb fraogen facack | State Gla |Posteode Ys 73
Signature(s) _Z2& _

N.B. This form has been designed for the convenience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form.

 

——

 

 

 

 

(\Wé), make the following submission:
la ¢

d

 

(if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach)

Privacy

Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Govemment Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by
persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's privacy policy.

www.noosa.gid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500
PO Box 144 Tewantin Old 4565 ABN 97 969 214 121

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.