Original source · versioned page text
2018-06-27 Special Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (12.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ATTACHMENT 4
UPDATED PROJECT RISK REGISTER: YUROL AND RINGTAIL FOREST PROPOSAL DATE OF REVIEW 1 JUNE 2018
Risk Description of Risk and impact on project Main Existing Controls Consequence level Likelihood Risk rating Risk Date of Future treatment required / Action items Expected timeline for Risk owner
No. (Insert description of identified risk, triggers, cause and Consequence (briefly outline existing controls currently in place to mitigate risk (if any)) (identify using matrix level (enter rating using movement previous (briefly outline future treatment to reduce risk (if any) to an acceptable level) and identify expectations that treatment will have on future treatment/ or (identify position within branch
potential impact on project objectives. Consider also risk of Category for existing controls) (identify using the matrix by (movement in review risk) next review responsible for managing risk
failing to pursue an identified opportunity, if any) matrix for reviewing risk rating from and treatment)
(select for
identified risk) existing controls) consequence x previous
likelihood)
review)
1 Political will at the State Government level Project Risk that if project momentum is not maintained issues may arise that impact State Government's ability and willingness to proceed. Also, significant delay Medium Possible M53 Decrease Oct-17 Continue to progress all aspects of the project in Council's control / responsibilities to ensure Council is ready to Jul-18 Council / CEO
resulting in delay deliverables may also reduce will of HQP. proceed as soon as possible.
Delay associated with internal progress and
approvals at the State Govt level could negatively The signing of the formal MOU in October 2017 provides some security for the project (whilst acknowledging it is
impact the will of project parties. not legally binding).
Risk that long delay could impact on grant funding The sooner parties can sign off a Funding Deed and make media releases the more difficult it will be from a
opportunties if independent parties are ready to go. political perspective for any Govt to stop the project.
2 Financial risks associated with reliance on NPA Financial Risks associated with this component of the agreement have been identified and included in financial modelling scenarios. Financial analysis of NPA Major Possible H73 No change Oct-17 Confirmation from NPA that its members are formally on-board with the project would provide some comfort that Jul-18 Project Group
for future funding financial statements have been undertaken, which indicate contributions beyond the initial $500K are not assured. the organisation is committed to the long term nature of this project, which will utilise a significant portion of its
Inherent risks with entering into agreement with NFP finances.
organisation that is high value and extends over Formal draft funding agreement has been drafted by Council's Lawyers for assessment. Despite this, Council must be aware that when signing off this project
multiple financial years. that financial contributions of NPA beyond the initial $500K to the State are not certain and options for Council to enforce funding agreement are limited. Application to be lodged for State Treasurer approval for Council to enter into an agreement with NPA (Statutory
Bodies Finanancil Arrangements Act - Type 1 Financial Arrangement) through the the State Department of
Approval is also required from the State Treasurer under the Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act for Council to enter into the agreement with NPA. Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning.
3 Failure to address Native Title implications and Project Legal advice has confirmed that Native Title is not extinguished over the project area. Accordingly, it is consider that the area will form part of regional Medium Possible M52 No change Oct-17 Future discussions with Indigenous Groups and State Departments required to determine desired use for the site Ongoing Project Group and
other future land use matters including failure to deliverables Indigenous Land Use Agreement negotiations. These are not considered to be high impact on the area. once protected. E.g. Mountain Biking, Indigenous Food trails etc. Transition Committee
identify opportunities to promote responsible
community use of the area PEO to liaise with National Parks re future recreational use particularly in relation to Noosa Trail network and
Failure to identify and promote opportunities for Noosa Bird Trail.
responsible Community Use of the project area
reduce value to the Community of the project Draft management plan for site will need to be developed and should involve community consultation etc. and
link with Council's Sport and Recreation Plan.
4 Risk of cost shifting from State Government to Financial / From negotiations undertaken between State, Council, NPA and HQP it is confirmed that but for the financial contribution of Council and NPA for the project Medium Possible M52 Decrease Oct-17 Education to the community via media release etc. if formal signoff is obtain to proceed should be undertaken to Ongoing Project Group
Council or perceptions of cost shifting - Given Reputational the project would not proceed. counter any negative perceptions.
that the ultimate aim of the project is for project land
to be transferred to National Park there is a risk of The project accelerates the protection of the land, which otherwise may not be protected for a significant amount of time.
the perception that Council via taking on the
responsibility for rehabilitation is cost shifting by the
State Government to support its National Park
Strategy.
5 Physical Environmental Risks impacting on Environmental Risk of bushfires, drought, pest etc. could impact significantly on Council's Rehab timeline and effectiveness. Limited controls available to reduce this risk Medium Possible M52 Decrease Oct-17 Ensure fire trails are maintained throughout life of the project and rehab is monitored closely to maximise Ongoing Environmental Services/
Council's Rehab however, it should be noted for completeness. Considered that Council's active rehab obligations end at 5 years after becoming trustee. environmental benefits. Parks and Natural Areas.
Risk of environmental factors on rehab component Also considered that such events are part of the natural cycle and difficult to avoid.
timelines.
6 Desired Koala Outcomes associated with the Environmental / Initial investigation indicate that project area is in the regional Koala corridor and interest on funds held in trust for 5 years will be utilised for Koala projects in Medium Possible M52 No change Oct-17 It is considered important that Koala research projects are commenced early in the project so that benefits can Ongoing Principal Environment
Project are not achieved Reputational the area. be realised as soon as possible. Officer / Transition
Committee
Given the Koala focus of this project there is a high Noted that the State has proposed to utilise interest earned on partner funds held in trust to be used only for
reputational risk for project parties if Koala's are not Koala related grant projects in the Noosa area.
benefited by the rehab and protection of the land.
Education component with respect to management community expectations is also important. Note that the
7 Internal Resources Required to manage addition Financial It is anticipated that unplanned management events will occur such as indiscriminate access, camping, bushfire and rubbish disposal which will all place Medium Possible M52 No change Oct-17 Ongoing monitoring once tenure transitions. Ongoing Project Group
Conservation Park by Council are underestimated additional responsibilities on environment services/natural areas staff. However, impact on Environmental Team and Parks and Natural Areas have been
Failing to accurately identify impact of managing the included in Council's costs estimates peer reviewed by LandCare and included in financial modelling. Local laws have confirmed limited impact on Additional plannning required from Environmental Services Team to ensure resrouces and capacity is in place to
project area on the Environment and Parks and resources as a result of expanding area of responsibility to include the additional area within responsibility. participate in transition committee and associated matters durign 18/19. Needs to be included in branch plan etc.
Natural Areas teams could put pressure on current
capacity, which may lead to request for further
resources.
8 Council and NPA reputational risks Political nous and management from CEO and Council regarding managing community expectations and setting up clear boundaries regarding extent of Medium Possible M52 No change Oct-17 Appropriate media statements pending project proceeding. Nov-17 CEO/Council
Political / Reputational Risk associated with Noosa project parties responsibilities and relationship of transactions.
Council being part of a significant multi party
agreement with Noosa Parks Association, which Formal MOU and subsequent agreements will be transparent and available for publication.
involves significant long term commitment.
9 Confidentiality / Media Attention It was agreed at meeting at DEHP on 9 June 2017 that no parties would contact the media until further notice. State Government would coordinate a draft Medium Possible M52 No change Oct-17 Project Parties and State Government to prepare media release in due course in accordance with agreed MOU Sep-17 CEO/Council/Officers
Given the large number of parties involved (some media release in due course to be signed off by all project parties before release. and agreement involved in the project
with Commercial Interests) and the large number of
people/stakeholders who this project could impact on Initial Council approval meeting is being held confidentially.
it is important that media is not informed about the
project until such time that parties are in some sort of
10 Failure to identify opportunities to reduce rehab Financial / Council Project team and Transition Committee must explore opportunities to reduce costs further. Medium Possible M52 Decrease Oct-17 Opportunities to reduce costs must continued to be explored throughout the project. Further research re Carbon Ongoing Project Group
costs and maximise value of the project Reputational offset opportunities, third party not for profit assistance e.g. land care, green army etc., Koala sanctuaries.
Risk of not identifying/exploring opportunities to Council must ensure that opportunities to reduce rehab costs are explored well in advance of commence formal rehabilitation e.g. environmental grants, good
reduce rehab costs to Council through the life of the Corporate Citizen projects etc. Future federal funding opportunities may be available such as under 20 Million Trees program.
project leads to negative financial consequences.
Initial investigations have been undertaken with respect to potential carbon and environmental offset opportunities for the project.
Page 37 of 65
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.