Council archive · source document
SDAP - State Code 22 - ERA · 132005.638.06
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities
Guideline – SDAP State code 22: Environmentally Relevant Activities provides direction on how to address this code.
Table 22.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
All ERAs
PO1 Development is suitably located and designed to AO1.1 Development meets the acoustic quality Complies – The proposed Composting
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the acoustic objectives for sensitive receptors identified in the Facility is centrally located within the NRRC
environment. Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019. and replaces the existing green waste
mulching process. Given the location and the
nature of the use, it is not expected that the
facility will worsen existing noise impacts
emanating from the NRRC (refer Town
Planning Report).
PO2 Development is suitably located and designed to AO2.1 Development meets the air quality objectives of Complies – The proposed Composting
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the air the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2019. Facility is centrally located within the NRRC
environment. and well removed from the surrounding rural
residential properties and has been designed
to mitigate any environmental harm from air
impacts (refer Attachment 6).
PO3 Development (other than intensive animal No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
industry for poultry farming), is suitably located and
designed to avoid or mitigate environmental harm on
adjacent sensitive land uses caused by odour.
PO4 Development is suitably located and designed to AO4.1 Development meets the management intent, Complies – An updated SWMP has been
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the receiving water quality guidelines and objectives of the provided for the Composting Facility, and the
waters environment. Environmental Protection (Water and Wetland matter of water quality has been adequately
Biodiversity) Policy 2019. addressed (refer Attachment 8).
PO5 Development is designed to include elements No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed development will
which: properly manage the leachate from the
1. prevent or minimise the production of hazardous proposed Composting Facility in accordance
contaminants and waste as by-products; or with an amended Environmental Authority to
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.6
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 1 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. contain and treat hazardous contaminants on-site include ERA53. The proposed composting
rather than releasing them into the environment; will not result in hazardous contaminants
and causing environmental harm, with onsite
3. provide secondary containment to prevent the treatment and management to be adopted,
accidental release of hazardous contaminants to including a trade waste connection as
the environment from spillage or leaks. required.
PO6 Environmentally hazardous materials located No acceptable outcome is prescribed. N/A
on-site are stored to avoid or minimise their release into
the environment due to inundation during flood events.
All development – matters of state environmental significance
PO7 Development is designed and sited to: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies – The proposed Composting
1. avoid impacts on matters of state environmental Facility will not have any impact on matters of
significance; or state environmental significance.
2. minimise and mitigate impacts on matters of state
environmental significance after demonstrating
avoidance is not reasonably possible; and
3. provide an offset if, after demonstrating all
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and mitigation
measures are undertaken, the development results
in an acceptable significant residual impact on a
matter of state environmental significance.
Statutory note: For Brisbane core port land, an offset may only be
applied to development on land identified as E1 Conservation/Buffer,
E2 Open Space or Buffer/Investigation in the Brisbane Port LUP
precinct plan.
Intensive animal industry – poultry farming (ERA 4(2))
PO8 Poultry farming development (where farming AO8.1 For poultry farming involving 300,000 birds or N/A
more than 200,000 birds) is suitably located and less, development meets the separation distances as
designed to avoid or mitigate environmental harm on determined using the S-factor methodology to:
adjacent sensitive land uses, caused by odour. 1. a sensitive land use in a rural zone; and
2. boundary of a non-rural zone.
OR
AO8.2 Development meets the separation distances as
determined by odour modelling using the following
criteria:
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.6
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 2 of 3
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
1. 2.5 odour units, 99.5 percent, 1 hour average for a
sensitive land use in a rural zone; or
2. 1.0 odour units, 99.5 percent, 1 hour average for
the boundary of a non-rural zone.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.6
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 3 of 3
Used in these records
SDAP - State Code 22 - ERA.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 100 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.