Council archive · source document
Sta Mcu Proposal 1 Gympie Kin Kin Rd · MCU25/0075
Applying the 4/60 rule in Kin Kin does not reflect the intent or context of its original purpose. It risks stifling appropriate economic activity and preventing local property owners from contributing to sustainable tourism. Kin Kin is my principal place of residence, and I take great pride in both my home and the community. I tend to my garden during the week and work most weekends as a professional cameraman on sporting events, frequently traveling to Brisbane or interstate. Offering short-term weekend accommodation presented a valuable opportunity for me to supplement my income, maintain my property, and welcome visitors to experience the charm and tranquillity of Kin Kin. I also own a property on Goodchap St Tewantin which for the past 3 years has been let to a single mother of three children at less than a third of market rate. The mother’s children all attend school in the Noosa area and rent was prohibitively expensive for her to rent a house nearby. This was only possible because the supplemental income from my Kin Kin short-term rental helped me cover the mortgage and associated costs. Adhering to the “4/60” STA Rule has now made this situation untenable. While the 60-day annual cap is reasonable, the “4 stays” rule is entirely impractical in a rural context like mine. To maximise that threshold, I would need guests to book four separate stays of 15 days each — something that simply isn’t in demand in this area. In reality, most visitors are looking for short, two- to three-night stays over a weekend. However, under the current rule, I was limited to hosting just four weekends a year. That level of restriction makes the property completely unviable to operate — the time and effort to prepare the property isn’t worth it for so few bookings. As a direct result, I've been forced to delist my Kin Kin property, and I am now in a position where I must reconsider the highly affordable rent I've offered in Tewantin to meet my financial obligations. I trust this application presents a compelling case for approval and consideration of a more place-responsive approach to rural short-term accommodation regulation. I request a site-specific exemption using a rural-specific policy framework that is appropriate in this case and consistent with performance-based planning principles. As a resident and property owner in Kin Kin, I am committed to supporting the sustainable development of our local tourism economy, which is a vital component of the town’s identity and resilience. I hope all supporting documentation is submitted as required, and I would welcome the opportunity to provide any further information during assessment. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Lincoln Cleak
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
STA MCU PROPOSAL 1 GYMPIE KIN KIN RD.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 337 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.