Council archive · source document
132006.268.03 - Original Court Approval - Attachment 1
5) Effluent treatment system and land application area This Conceptual Effluent Treatment and Disposal Strategy was conducted using a combination of new data and data taken from the previous site investigation undertaken by Global Testing in 2007. The proposed treatment and application methods to be employed on-site are based on the following guidelines and authorities: « the ‘Queensland Plumbing and Wastewater Code, 2006’ © AS/NZS 1547:2000 ‘On-site Domestic Wastewater Management’ 5 * Planning Guidelines for Water Supply and Sewerage © * Queensland Water Recycling Guidelines, 2005.’ Based on previous testing detailed in Section 3 of this report and the proposed site use, it is proposed that the most effective and flexible method of irrigating treated wastewater for the site would be via surface sprinkler. In calculating a suitable disposal area for the predicted wastewater loadings, the site was assigned a conservative permeability of 0.22m/day in accordance with Category 5 soils as detailed in Table 4.2A4 of AS/NZS 1547:2000. A conservative proposed irrigation area for the expected effluent Joadings was therefore calculated incorporating the recommended design irrigation rate (DIR) of 20 mm/week for a category 5 soil from Table 4.2A4 of AS/NZS 1547 (2000). This is detailed in Section 5.4. 5.1 Wastewater loadings The following proposed wastewater loadings are based on interviews with Cooroy Mountain Spring Water staff and 5 Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, 2000, ASINZS 1547:2000 On-site domestic wastewater management. ’ Department of Natural Resources & Mines, 2005, Planning Guidelines for Water Supply and Sewerage. Chapter 5 - Demand/Flow and Projections - Table A. 7 Queensland Government, Environmental Protection Agency, 2005, WaterWise Queensland. Queensland Water Recycling Guidelines 2005. GILBERT+SUTHERLANG data obtained from Appendix 4.2D of AS/NZS 1547:2000. Table 5.1.1 lists the wastewater generating activities at the redeveloped site during the peak summer period when the facility is fully staffed (48 persons). Table 5.1.1 Proposed wastewater volumes Source Volume | Number | Volume per of of waste- person | people water (L) (Uday) On-site 180 5 3900 residence Dual flush 27.5 48 1,320 toilet* Hand . 8 48 384 washing** Kitchen 5 48 240 Misc. 10 48 480 TOTAL - 3,324 *Assumes 11/5.5 dual flush cistern, with 1 fult flush and 3 half flushes per person per day. ** Assumes 4 x 2L washes per day. For the on-site residence it is assumed that it will be a permanent 5 person household connected to a bore water supply (i.e. 180L/person/day). For the bottling facility and administration block, the above loadings assume a total of 50.5L/person/day. This is in line with the loadings for industrial use (50L per person) from AS1547:2000. . 5.2 Bottling facility wash down In addition to the above tabled wastewater generation projections there is a volume of water used on a weekly basis to hose down the internal shed floors. This is performed once a week using a pressure cleaner to conserve water and expedite the task. This water is currently collected in a connected series of concrete drains embedded in the shed floor. It is proposed that these will drain to a central underground sump equipped with a pump and float switch to enable the contained waters to be pumped to the effluent disposal system as the sump level requires. Assuming that the pressure cleaner uses 600L per hour and the wash down takes half an hour, it is estimated that the 5-1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
132006.268.03 - Original Court Approval - Attachment 1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.