Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

LATE RFI -App F - Meeting Notes 20.06.2025

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

VANZETTI | 18 Attunga Heights, Noosa Heads
Meeting Date | 20th June 2025
Meeting Location | Teams
Present | Mitch, Isaac, Andrew, Nick + Gemma
Duration | 1hr

Meeting Objective
   o   Review Council’s RFI + Confirm a direction for each item.

Key Discussion Points
Meeting Note: Extension required for submission, Russel to co-ordinate with Andrew (Current due
date 1st July)

1. COUNCIL ISSUE - Roof Forms & Façade Design
    • Insufficient eaves for shading front windows and balconies
    • Boxy appearance of Unit A’s front façade
    • Operable screen on Unit A, when closed, would dominate the streetscape and contribute to a boxy
       form.

INFORMATION REQUIRED -
    • Please provide additional justification demonstrating how the proposed development complies with
      Performance Outcome PO19 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code.
    • Referencing comparable, existing or recently approved developments within the local area will
      strengthen your response.
    • Submit amended roof and façade designs that:
    • Avoid box-like building profiles
    • Incorporate adequate eaves to provide shading, in line with PO19 / AO19.1
    • To help reduce perceived bulk and improve visual interest:
    • Consider alternative screening treatments, particularly for Unit A
    • Revised designs should also respond to PO14 / AO14.1 and AO14.2 of the Medium Density Residential
      Zone Code

MEETING NOTES + CONFIRMED DIRECTION
Meetng Note:
   - Andrew was favorable with the roof forms we had proposed and suggested they seem to
      align with surrounding neighborhood context.
   - When updating façade be concise of maintaining eaves (Andrew was favorable towards the
      façade as is however suggested the operable screens be removed.
   - The purpose of these rules is to avoid duplicates and mirrored developments.
   - Other examples of neighbors that have box shapes (as Russel sent through) will help
      support submission.
   - Andrew seemed supportive of the natural hues and tones that were demonstrated in Nick
      and Gemma’s latest facade inspiration board. Noting large bright white colours are not
      generally favorable. Note the project next door to Nick and Gemma’s was a renovation and
      not likely submitted through council.
   - Andrew was favorable to adding curved featurse to the façade as demonstrated in Nick and
      Gemma’s latest facade inspiration board.

Direction: Reitsma to Workshop with Nick and Gemma new façade design in line with Nick and
Gemma’s latest facade inspiration board.
Log in to download the original file

LATE RFI -App F - Meeting Notes 20.06.2025.pdf · 386 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.