Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Planning Report

of 77

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 Assessment Benchmark                                       Response
       (iii)     is a medium value rehabilitation habitat
                 area.

 (c) if the clearing of non-juvenile koala habitat          See above response to parts (a) and (b).
     trees can not be avoided in an area stated in
     paragraph (b)—

 (i) the amount of clearing is minimised; and

 (ii) any significant residual impact of the clearing is
 offset;

 (j) the matters stated in section 2(2)(a) to (e).          The previous approval considered the extent of
                                                            vegetation to be supported.

                                                            Based on the above, the vegetation is not considered
                                                            to be important Koala habitat or form part of any
                                                            important Koala habitat corridor.




                                                                     OUTLINE OF STATE AND REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK AND
URBIS
RPT-20190516-2-18 & 20 HOFMANN DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE_FINAL                                                     ASSESSMENT   33
Log in to download the original file

Planning Report.pdf · 5.4 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.