Original source · versioned page text
Planning Report
Assessment Benchmark Response
(iii) is a medium value rehabilitation habitat
area.
(c) if the clearing of non-juvenile koala habitat See above response to parts (a) and (b).
trees can not be avoided in an area stated in
paragraph (b)—
(i) the amount of clearing is minimised; and
(ii) any significant residual impact of the clearing is
offset;
(j) the matters stated in section 2(2)(a) to (e). The previous approval considered the extent of
vegetation to be supported.
Based on the above, the vegetation is not considered
to be important Koala habitat or form part of any
important Koala habitat corridor.
OUTLINE OF STATE AND REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK AND
URBIS
RPT-20190516-2-18 & 20 HOFMANN DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE_FINAL ASSESSMENT 33
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.