Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Patricia Collis- MCU18/0019
zs
mz MENON eeoluie e [ ——_Notice of Submission
: Deve ;
| To ensure your submission is properly made you must eneure tt thet. Se rt fs
: 1. be made to the assessment manager | I:
/2- bein writing a |
13. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the ission is made electronically |
(4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission = ae
| 6. state what espects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why
6. be received by Council during the formal public notification. period
As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, Irrespective of whether or not
they are properly made.
‘File No. MCU18 / 0019 or
Postal address of Land (as advertised) 52-62 Goodchap Street & 3-11 Val Crescent Noosaville 22
: Nature of Proposed Development - Housing Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (Aged Care Facility) a
: Full name of Submitter a ae Mts “ ie os ee
Postaladdress PO, 9/9. “iin.
“Suburb W00sh HEADS — ‘State (PLD Postcode
=a) a P aT
‘Signature(s) farvtewag fin. Coble
3. Details of Submission
: 1 (We), make the following submission:
|4. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is _
‘Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically one continuous building ;
‘taking up 11 lots) will look totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.
12, The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature 28 a result of the development.
:3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facility on this site is in direct conflict with
‘the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Pian was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
‘the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed
: development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,
i which Is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.
4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive and is an overdevelopment of the site.
is. | understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be located
in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development.
‘6. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in tarms of car
: parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A890 bad d facili
: across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles wil
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.
Www.noose.aid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 6329 6500
BM Raw 141 Tawrentin Mel ARE AMAL AT AER Ase ona
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Patricia Collis- MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 380 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.