Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document MCU22-0102 Stormwater Management Plan
The original of this document is very large (29.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Verification Certificate – SQIDEP VC
Reference Number: SA-2021/006/VC
Technology Information
Applicant’s Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 88 %
Verified Total Phosphorus (TP) 69 %
Performance Total Nitrogen (TN) 67 %
Claims Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0%
Maintenance Maintenance procedures undertaken during the monitoring period included
performed cleaning of the sedimentation chamber once every 12 months. The filter bag
during was also checked once every 12 months but was not replaced.
monitoring
Verified • The submitted, calibrated MUSIC model provides a method of modelling the
method to technology with 1 Generic node as per the image below, with a bypass
model in flowrate equivalent to 0.5L/s/lin.m of Hydrochannel;
MUSIC
• The input criteria for the node is;
o Generic node
High Flow Bypass 0.5 L/s/lin.m
Total Suspended Solids Input = 1000 mg/L Output = 120 mg/L
Total Phosphorus Input = 5 mg/L Output = 1.55 mg/L
Total Nitrogen Input = 50 mg/L Output = 16.5 mg/L
Conditions The limitations of the acceptance of these claims include:
• The results are for a road based catchment. The results lie within acceptable
inflow limits for this type of catchment and based on the analysis are found to
be acceptable. This does not necessarily relate to other catchment types,
though it is noted that hard stand catchments will behave similarly. Cleaner,
roof catchments may not achieve the same pollutant reduction targets.
• The results are for a hydraulic loading rate up to 0.5 L/s per metre module.
Should the hydraulic load rate exceed this, the results would be expected to
decline in line with excessive loading on the device.
• The results are reliant on the maintenance of the device being consistent with
the manufacturers guidelines and those that are contained in the report.
© Stormwater Australia 2021 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.