Council archive · source document
20517 App M.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259
Very large file (27.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
SCANLON PROPERTY GROUP & Ecological Assessment : natural solutions environmental consultants Draft Report 2.2.8 Biodiversity Assessment and Mapping Methodology (BAMM) The BAMM classifies areas (areas based on RE mapping) into one of three levels of Biodiversity significance: State, Regional, and Local or Other Values. All areas within the site are rated as State significance. This means that the areas are assessed as being significant for biodiversity at the bioregional or state scales. This rating also includes areas assessed by other studies / processes as being significant at national or international scales. Seven diagnostic criteria are used to initially assess the Biodiversity Significance of areas: 1. Habitat for EVR Taxa (Criteria A) — this criterion brings together information on Endangered, Vulnerable, and Rare (EVR) taxa using buffering of recorded sites in the absence of Habitat Suitability Maps (HSM) for species. HSMs are gradually being developed and will progressively replace point records of species. 2. Ecosystem Value (Criteria B) — this criterion combines a number of elements including the Biodiversity Status of Regional Ecosystems (REs), the presence of poorly conserved REs, the presence of significant wetlands, and areas of national importance such as World Heritage Areas and RAMSAR sites (Note: B1=regional assessment; B2=sub-regional assessment). 3. Tract Size (Criteria C) — this criterion is a measure of the relative size of tracts of vegetation in the landscape. 4. Relative Size of REs (Criteria D) — this criterion classifies the relative size of each examples of a RE. Patches are compared with all other occurrences of the same RE (Note: D1=regional assessment; D2=sub-regional assessment). 5. Condition (Criteria E) — this criterion represents the quality of remnants judged by the extent to which they resemble their natural condition. 6. Ecosystem Diversity (Criteria F) - this criterion reflects the degree to which REs are ‘packed’ within an area. That is, an area with high Ecosystem Diversity will have relatively many REs and ecotones. 7. Context and Condition (Criteria G) - this criterion represents the extent to which Remnant Unit incorporates, borders or buffers areas such as significant wetlands, endangered ecosystems, and the degree to which a Remnant Unit is connected to other vegetation. For each area, each diagnostic criterion is allocated a standard rating of LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, or VERY HIGH. The following table summarises the diagnostic criterion ratings for each of the areas within the subject site, shown in Figure 2. June 2007 (10 ) Y:\O7\W07-049_215-219 David Low Way,Peregian\Reports\Draft\070618_DR Ecological Assessment_J07-049_JW.doc
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
20517 App M.pdf [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 27.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.