Council archive · source document
20517 App M.pdf [As Published] · 132007.1259
Very large file (27.4 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
SCANLON PROPERTY GROUP, & Ecological Assessment a natural solutions environmental consultants Draft Report 7.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is for a material change of use (MCU) for commercial and accommodation buildings (Figure 8). A single commercial building is proposed for the east of the site adjacent to David Low Way. The accommodation buildings are proposed for the existing caravan park area as far west as the current vegetation buffer. These buildings will consist of hostel accommodation comprising three buildings connected by raised walkways, and 30 beach shacks (one to become caretaker's residence). In addition, a caretaker’s residence will occur at the entrance to the site, which will be via the existing service road off David Low Way. Additional recreational infrastructure associated with two communal areas (comprising cooking facilities, play areas, and pool) are also proposed to be located centrally within the accommodation buildings. The western portion of the site which is currently comprised of the vegetation buffer and remnant wet heath habitat adjacent to Noosa National Park is retained within the proposed development layout as a 35-80m vegetated buffer feature. In addition, the existing vegetation buffer will be rehabilitated to remove and control weed species. 7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Ecological investigations suggest that the ecological constraints for further development of the Peregian Beach Caravan Park will be associated with: . Providing acceptable vegetated and rehabilitated buffers between the national park and areas of development. Further environmental considerations will need to include; . Management of stormwater runoff into the buffer and National Park; . Management of nutrient run off into the buffer and National Park; . Bushfire management and mitigation measures (including set-backs, asset design, fire breaks etc); and . Acid sulphate soils management. It is also our opinion that stormwater / nutrient runoff into the buffer / National Park will be a major concern. 7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITATIONS It is apparent, from previous Council correspondence (Noosa Shire Council, 2004), that areas of remnant vegetation in the western portion of the subject site are unlikely to be approved for development. These constraints are considered to also meet responsibilities in protecting potential habitat for known threatened species listed under the Federal and State legislation. June 2007 ( 33 ) Y:\J07\J07-049_215-219 David Low Way, Peregian\Reports\Draft\070627_DR Ecological Assessment_JO7-049.doc
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
20517 App M.pdf [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 27.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.