Council archive · source document
RFI - Appendix C Traffic Engineering Report · MCU22/0038
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
20 May 2022
620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response 20220520.docx
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
399 Montague Road
West End QLD 4101
Attention: Kelly Alcorn
Dear Kelly
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre
NSC Information Request
Response to Traffic Matters
Reference is made to the Information Request (IR) issued by Noosa Shire Council (NSC) on 13 April 2022 in
relation to the abovementioned development application, a copy of which is provided at Attachment A for
reference. This document has been prepared to respond to the traffic matters raised therein and should be read
in conjunction with the original Code responses prepared by SLR Consulting dated 16 March 2022 that was
submitted as part of the original development application.
The relevant traffic matters raised within the IR are reproduced in bold italics herein followed by a response as
required.
Item 2 – Car parking provisions
Section 5 of the SLR memo assesses parking requirements of the proposal against the superseded planning
scheme provisions as being 109 spaces.
The SLR memo also assesses parking requirements based on “amended structure plan” rates quoted as being
1 space per 20m2 GFA at ground level plus 1 space per 30m2 GFA on other levels. This only relates to
development located in the Major Centre Zone Code in Noosa Heads, the subject site is within Noosaville.
My reading of the Noosa Plan 2020 parking requirement for the development is 1 space per 20m2 GFA for
office and 1 space per 20m2 GFA for health care service, both of which would require the provision of 109
parking spaces at the site.
That is, both the superseded planning scheme and the current planning scheme require 109 parking spaces,
compared with only 99 proposed parking spaces.
The SLR memo attempts to justify the shortfall on two grounds (directly quoted from the report hereunder):
i. “The proposed parking capacity is however considered to be acceptable owing to the proponent’s
intended delivery of the nearby multi-modal transport hub, which would increase the attractiveness
of public transport to both employees and customers as an alternative to driving to and from the
proposed development”.
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd Level 16, 175 Eagle Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia (PO Box 26 Spring Hill QLD 4004)
T: +61 7 3858 4800 E: [email protected]
www.slrconsulting.com ABN 29 001 584 612
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 17 pages
Page 2
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
ii. “Additionally, the location of the subject site within the broader Noosa Business Centre means that a
significant portion of development-generated trips are likely to be linked with other uses, therefore
reducing parking demand and spreading it across the existing parking areas proximate to the subject
site.”
In relation to the two grounds identified in the SLR memo:
i. It is understood that the proponent is not proposing to deliver the multi-modal transport hub.
ii. While it is agreed that there will be linked trips with other uses at the Noosa Business Centre, all that
means is that the overall traffic generation rate of the centre on a GFA basis reduces as the size of the
centre increases, it does not mean that parking demands associated with the proposal will reduce. It
simply means that some customers will park for longer in the same parking space while they
undertake other activities at the Centre. The customers and staff of the proposed development will
still generate the same parking demands.
Information Required
2. Provide parking provisions consistent with planning scheme requirements.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
Further justification for the provision of 99 parking spaces is provided through a ‘First Principles’ approach. Table
1 below provides a representative breakdown of tenancy type, along with their corresponding tenancy GFA and
total number of medical practitioners (MP). Whilst the scale and nature of each tenancy will ultimately be
subject to market demands SLR has been advised that there is an inter-relationship between the tenancies that
means that achieving a mix similar to the representative breakdown is quite likely to occur in practice. Further,
due to the typical nature of specialists practicing from more than one location, an Occupancy factor has been
provided.
Table 1 Representative Tenancy Mix
Yield Number of Practitioners (Total
Land Use Component Occupancy (at any one time)
(sq.m GFA) capacity/tenancy)
General Practice 250 8 75%
Pathology 60 2 100%
Dental 280 3 66%
Physiotherapy 150 2 100%
Radiology 270 2 100%
Medical
Specialist 260 3 66%
Centre
Cosmetic / Plastic
150 1 100%
Surgery
Eye Surgery 150 2 50%
Psychology 150 2 100%
Podiatry 150 1 100%
Allied Health 300 4 100%
Total 2170 30 -
Page 2
Page 3
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
From tenancy information provided by Stockwell, it is anticipated that approximately 30 medical practitioners
will practice out of the medical centre. To determine the parking demand that the above tenancy characteristics
will generate, Table 2 below has been provided which describes the number of medical practitioners expected
to be at the medical centre at any one time (adjusted with the occupancy factor), plus it applies a rate of 3
parking spaces per medical practitioner to determine a realistic ‘First Principles’ parking demand.
Table 2 First Principles – Calculations
Number of Number of Number of parking spaces
Land Use Component Practitioners (Total Practitioners (at any (based on rate of 3
capacity/tenancy) one time) spaces/medical practitioner)
General Practice 8 6 18
Pathology 2 2 6
Dental 3 2 6
Physiotherapy 2 2 6
Radiology 2 2 6
Medical
Specialist 3 2 6
Centre
Cosmetic / Plastic
1 1 3
Surgery
Eye Surgery 2 1 3
Psychology 2 2 6
Podiatry 1 1 3
Allied Health 4 4 12
Total 30 25 75
The resultant total number of parking spaces required based on a ‘First Principles’ approach equates to
approximately 75 parking spaces. However, SLR suggests that it would be appropriate to apply a 20% factor of
safety to this calculation given that the specific tenancy arrangements are not resolved at this time. Hence the
calculated first principles rate inclusive of a 20% factor of safety is 90 spaces.
Council’s superseded planning scheme describes the minimum vehicle parking requirements for a Commercial
business, Type 2 – Medical as ‘1 space per 20m2, or part thereof, of use area; OR 3 spaces per medical practitioner
whichever is the greater’. As per SLR’s Traffic Impact Statement dated 16 March 2022, applying the ‘1 space per
20m2’ rate to the total GFA of 2,170m2 equates to approximately 109 spaces. When applying a rate of ‘3 spaces
per medical practitioner’ to the total number of medical practitioners, this results in a requirement to provide
90 parking spaces.
To provide a comparison of the three varied parking demand outcomes as per above, these results are replicated
below:
Council’s superseded planning scheme rate of 1 space/20m2 = 109 spaces required;
Council’s superseded planning scheme rate of 3 spaces/MP = 90 spaces required;
SLR’s ‘First Principles’ approach = 75 spaces required, factored to 90 spaces including the factor of
safety.
Page 3
Page 4
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
As is evident from above, there is a large variance between the three different approaches and SLR would argue
that the ‘First Principles’ approach reflects the most likely parking demand for the medical centre. As such, it
can be concluded that the provision of 99 parking spaces, as per the proposed development plan will be
sufficient to accommodate peak parking demands in the context of future planning. Furthermore, it will
encourage a transport mode shift away from the single-occupancy vehicle to more sustainable options such as
public transport and active transport, as is the strategic intent for transport as per Council’s Noosa Plan 2020.
Item 3 – Service vehicles
The development proposes an ambulance bay, and a refuse storage area. There is no other provision for
deliveries. Whether the development is occupied by office or medical uses, there will be demands for deliveries
by vehicles of at least SRV in size.
Information Required
3. Demonstrate how deliveries by vehicles other than vans will occur in a satisfactory manner or provide
an SRV loading bay.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
Refer to Attachment B Figure 2 which demonstrates an SRV swept path utilising Easement AC to
circulate through the site facilitating deliveries.
In reference to the Infrastructure Agreement between Noosa Shire Council and Stockwell for the Noosa
Shire Business Centre (Lot 3 on SP246584), specific mention is made regarding Easement AC at the rear
of the existing Showroom tenancies as follows: ‘Easement AC is a vehicular access easement providing
service vehicle access over the existing driveway and will benefit proposed Lots 2 and 22’.
With the above in mind, the proposed SRV delivery approach, as per SLR Figure 2, is consistent with
the intentions of the Infrastructure Agreement and provides for a suitable method for servicing SRV
deliveries.
Item 4 – Clarification of vehicle priority and routes
Information Required
4. Assess and propose signage and line-marking as necessary in the following areas of potential
uncertainty for road users:
i. General traffic volumes along easement AB will significantly increase as a result of the proposal,
potentially leading to driver confusion as to who has priority at the oddly configured t-junction just on
the northern side of the site access driveway.
ii. Direction signage for vehicles departing from the basement to discourage travel along the service aisle
that runs along the rear of the showrooms.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
Refer to Attachment B Figure 3 which depicts conceptual line marking and signage arrangements to
address the above items 4i and 4ii.
Page 4
Page 5
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
Item 8 - Headroom
Clause 5.3 HEADROOM of AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 requires that “the height between the floor and an overhead
obstruction shall be a minimum of 2200mm.”
The submitted Traffic Assessment Report indicates that the minimum height between the floor and an
overhead obstruction is approximately 1.7m (refer to snippet below).
Information Required
8. Provide amended plans demonstrating compliance with Clause 5.3 HEADROOM of AS/NZS
2890.1:2004.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
Please refer to Attachment B Figure 5 which provides clarification on the location of suspended slab
structure and column for vehicle overhead obstructions on the ramp.
Item 9 – B99 turn around in Basement 02
From the provided documentation it is not clear that a B99 vehicle will be able to turn around at the proposed
Turn Around Bay located on the NE corner of Basement 02 using a maximum 3 point turn manoeuvre.
Information Required
9. Provide travel paths for a B99 vehicle, demonstrating how it will turn around at the proposed Turn
Around Bay located on the NE corner of Basement 02, without having to use more than a 3 point turn to do
so.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
Please refer to Attachment B Figure 6 which shows a modification to the Storage/Plant area to
accommodate a B99 three-point turn within Basement 02.
Should you have any queries in relation to this response, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours sincerely
BRENDYN RHEINBERGER
Associate Consultant - Transport Advisory
Checked/
Authorised by:
Page 5
Page 6
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
ATTACHMENT A
Noosa Shire Council Information Request
Page 6
Page 7
Officer: Patrick Murphy
Direct Telephone: 07 5329 6436
Our Reference: MCU22/0038
Your Reference: n/a
13 April 2022
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
PO Box 3144
SOUTH BRISBANE QLD 4101
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam
Information Request
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that Council requires further information to satisfactorily
assess the proposal.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No. MCU22/0038
Street Address: Noosa Civic 28 Eenie Creek Rd Noosaville Qld 4566
Real Property Description: Lot 3 SP 246584
Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan (8 June 2018)
2. INFORMATION REQUIRED
The information requested is set out below:
Issue
The Noosa Plan (8 June 2018) seeks a 5-degree roof pitch with 600mm eaves to 75% of the
building. The roof has a pitch of 1.5-degrees with a small section having a 3-degree pitch. This
results in sections of the roof appearing flat.
Information Required
1. Amended plans with the roof pitch increased to comply with Specific Outcome O20 of
the Noosaville Locality Code.
Issue
Car parking provisions
Section 5 of the SLR memo assesses parking requirements of the proposal against the
superseded planning scheme provisions as being 109 spaces.
The SLR memo also assesses parking requirements based on “amended structure plan” rates
quoted as being 1 space per 20m2 GFA at ground level plus 1 space per 30m2 GFA on other
levels. This only relates to development located in the Major Centre Zone Code in Noosa
Heads, the subject site is within Noosaville.
PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 1 of 5
Page 8
My reading of the Noosa Plan 2020 parking requirement for the development is 1 space per
20m2 GFA for office and 1 space per 20m2 GFA for health care service, both of which would
require the provision of 109 parking spaces at the site.
That is, both the superseded planning scheme and the current planning scheme require 109
parking spaces, compared with only 99 proposed parking spaces.
The SLR memo attempts to justify the shortfall on two grounds (directly quoted from the report
hereunder):
(i) “The proposed parking capacity is however considered to be acceptable owing to
the proponent’s intended delivery of the nearby multi-modal transport hub, which
would increase the attractiveness of public transport to both employees and
customers as an alternative to driving to and from the proposed development”.
(ii) “Additionally, the location of the subject site within the broader Noosa Business
Centre means that a significant portion of development-generated trips are likely
to be linked with other uses, therefore reducing parking demand and spreading it
across the existing parking areas proximate to the subject site.”
In relation to the two grounds identified in the SLR memo:
(i) It is understood that the proponent is not proposing to deliver the multi-modal
transport hub.
(ii) While it is agreed that there will be linked trips with other uses at the Noosa
Business Centre, all that means is that the overall traffic generation rate of the
centre on a GFA basis reduces as the size of the centre increases, it does not
mean that parking demands associated with the proposal will reduce. It simply
means that some customers will park for longer in the same parking space while
they undertake other activities at the Centre. The customers and staff of the
proposed development will still generate the same parking demands.
Information Required
2. Provide parking provisions consistent with planning scheme requirements.
Issue
Service vehicles
The development proposes an ambulance bay, and a refuse storage area. There is no other
provision for deliveries. Whether the development is occupied by office or medical uses, there
will be demands for deliveries by vehicles of at least SRV in size.
Information Required
3. Demonstrate how deliveries by vehicles other than vans will occur in a satisfactory
manner or provide an SRV loading bay.
Issue
Clarification of vehicle priority and routes
Information Required
4. Assess and propose signage and line-marking as necessary in the following areas of
potential uncertainty for road users:
(i) General traffic volumes along easement AB will significantly increase as a result
of the proposal, potentially leading to driver confusion as to who has priority at
the oddly configured t-junction just on the northern side of the site access
driveway.
(ii) Direction signage for vehicles departing from the basement to discourage travel
along the service aisle that runs along the rear of the showrooms.
Page 2 of 5
Page 9
Issue – Stormwater
The submitted documentation indicates that biobasin treated stormwater will “connect to the
basement drainage system for pump out to the external drainage system” and that “this is
required due to the high invert levels of the existing external stormwater network.”
The submitted documentation is unclear on:
- how the water will be pumped from the basement into the lawful points of discharge;
- the details of the proposed pump system (size, pipes, tanks, power supply, power
redundancy, etc.);
- the location of the proposed pumping system and the effect on carparking layout,
including the proposed turn around area.
Information Required
5. Provide amended plans detailing the proposed stormwater management system,
including but not limited to:
5.1. Location and dimensions of the proposed basement pump out system, including
any required tanks, pipe sizes, etc.;
5.2. How the basement pump out system will affect the proposed carparking
arrangement and vehicle manoeuvring areas; and
5.3. How the basement pump out system will be powered and what redundancy power
arrangement/system will be put in place to ensure the basements won’t flood in
case the principal system fails.
Issue
Technical review of Stormwater Management Plan
Contact has been made with several external hydraulic engineers seeking a review of the
submitted Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). Due to the holiday period and existing
workloads, it has not been possible to engage a hydraulic engineer and the review of the
SWMP has not been completed. This will be resolved after the Easter break.
Information Required
6. Information request items regarding the SWMP are to be provided shortly.
Issue
The submitted documentation (drawing “Stormwater Treatment Plan”, CP.1.01, Rev A,
prepared by MPN Consulting) indicates that the existing footpath, to the frontage of the subject
property, is to be removed and replaced with a new 1.8m wide one. The existing footpath is
2m wide.
Information Required
7. Submit amended plans showing all proposed footpaths to be 2m wide.
Issue
Clause 5.3 HEADROOM of AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 requires that “the height between the floor
and an overhead obstruction shall be a minimum of 2200mm.”
The submitted Traffic Assessment Report indicates that the minimum height between the floor
and an overhead obstruction is approximately 1.7m (refer to snippet below).
Page 3 of 5
Page 10
Information Required
8. Provide amended plans demonstrating compliance with Clause 5.3 HEADROOM of
AS/NZS 2890.1:2004.
Issue
From the provided documentation it is not clear that a B99 vehicle will be able to turn around
at the proposed Turn Around Bay located on the NE corner of Basement 02 using a maximum
3 point turn manoeuvre.
Information Required
9. Provide travel paths for a B99 vehicle, demonstrating how it will turn around at the
proposed Turn Around Bay located on the NE corner of Basement 02, without having to
use more than a 3 point turn to do so.
3. DUE DATE FOR RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST
The due date for providing the requested information is 19 July 2022. Email your response to
[email protected]. Please advise Council of your response to this information request
in accordance with section 13 of the Development Assessment Rules.
If you do not provide a response before the due date, it will be taken as if you have decided
not to respond to the information request and Council will continue with the assessment of
your application.
4. OTHER DETAILS
You can follow the progress of this application online at www.noosa.qld.gov.au. The “Online
Services” page can be accessed via "Quick Links" on the left hand side of the screen.
Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me on the number above.
Page 4 of 5
Page 11
Yours faithfully, Patrick Murphy Coordinator Planning Page 5 of 5
Page 12
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30769-L01-v0.2 IR Response
Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre 20220520.docx
NSC Information Request Date: 20 May 2022
Response to Traffic Matters
ATTACHMENT B
SLR Figures
Page 7
Page 13
LY
ON
PT
N CE
CO
FLOW PATH)
TO BASEMENT 01
RAMP RAMP
1:5 1:10 REFUSE
UP
EASEMENT AB
FROM LEVEL 1
AMBULANCE
EXISTING ACCESS and CARPARKING
YS + 1 AMBULANCE
L16, 175 EAGLE STREET Project No: 620.30769 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
BRISBANE 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 19/05/2022 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hoffman Drive Medical Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance N
Scale: AS SHOWN Ambulance Swept Path
The content contained within this document may 0.0 1 2 3 4
be based on third party data. Sheet Size: A3 METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 1
Page 14
LY
ON
PT
N CE
CO
RELOCATE SRV BAY
TO THIS LOCATION.
L16, 175 EAGLE STREET Project No: 620.30769 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
BRISBANE 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 20/05/2022 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance N
Scale: AS SHOWN SRV Swept Path
The content contained within this document may 0.0 1 2 3 4
be based on third party data. Sheet Size: A3 METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 2
Page 15
LY
ON
PLANT/RAIN WATER TANK
(RAISED ABOVE OVERLAND FLOW PATH)
T
EP
FROM BASEMENT
NC
UP
TO BASEMENT 01
RAMP RAMP
CO
1:5 1:10 REFUSE
UP
TO L
EASEMENT AB
FROM LEVEL 1
EVEL
AMBULANCE
1 NEW LINE MARKING TO DISCOURAGE USE
OF REAR SERVICE LANE. THIS IS
SUPPLEMENTED BY 'NO ENTRY AUTHORISED
UP
VEHICLES EXCEPTED' SIGNAGE.
GROUND FLOOR GFA:
1,003m²
SSL 10.3m
EXISTING ACCESS and CARPARKING
10m²
BIO-B
ASIN
8 BAYS + 1 AMBULANCE
NOTE: INTERTENANCY WALLS INDICATIVE ONLY
PWD
SHARED
ZONE
8 BICYCLES
LIFT
TO LEVEL 01
FROM BASEMENT
EASEMENT AB
10m² BIO-BASIN
L16 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30769 Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
BRISBANE 4000
AUSTRALIA
Date: 19/05/22
T: 61 7 3858 4800
LEGEND Noosaville Hofmann Dr, Medical Centre
Drawn by: BR
www.slrconsulting.com Retain Existing Line Marking N
Scale: AS SHOWN New Line Marking
0.0 2.5 5 7.5 10
Medical Centre Car Park, Line
The content contained within this document may be based
on third party data. Sheet Size: A3 METRES
Marking and Signage Concept
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not guarantee the Projection: -
SCALE 1:250
accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 3
Page 16
LY
ON
PLANT/RAIN WATER TANK
(RAISED ABOVE OVERLAND FLOW PATH)
T
EP
FROM BASEMENT
NC
UP
TO BASEMENT 01
RAMP RAMP
CO
1:5 1:10 REFUSE
UP
TO L
EASEMENT AB
FROM LEVEL 1
EVEL
AMBULANCE
B99 VEHICLE SWEPT PATHS IN OPPOSING
1 NEW LINE MARKING TO DISCOURAGE USE DIRECTIONS CONFIRM SUFFICIENT SPACE
OF REAR SERVICE LANE. THIS IS PROVIDED FOR CONCURRENT TURNING
SUPPLEMENTED BY 'NO ENTRY AUTHORISED
UP
MOVEMENTS INTO/OUT OF RAMP.
VEHICLES EXCEPTED' SIGNAGE.
GROUND FLOOR GFA:
1,003m²
SSL 10.3m
EXISTING ACCESS and CARPARKING
10m²
BIO-B
ASIN
8 BAYS + 1 AMBULANCE
NOTE: INTERTENANCY WALLS INDICATIVE ONLY
PWD SWEPT PATH ASSESSMENT OF HRV
SHARED
ZONE
ENTERING SITE AND B99 VEHICLE EXITING
SITE CONCURRENTLY. SMALL OVERLAP
8 BICYCLES INDICATES THESE TWO MANOEUVRE'S
MUST OCCUR SEPARATELY.
LIFT
TO LEVEL 01
FROM BASEMENT
EASEMENT AB
10m² BIO-BASIN
L16 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30769 Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
BRISBANE 4000
AUSTRALIA
Date: 19/05/22
T: 61 7 3858 4800
LEGEND Noosaville Hofmann Drive, Medical Centre
Drawn by: BR
www.slrconsulting.com Retain Existing Line Marking N
Scale: AS SHOWN New Line Marking
0.0 2.5 5 7.5 10
Medical Centre Car Park, Line
The content contained within this document may be based
on third party data. Sheet Size: A3 METRES
Marking and Signage Concept
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not guarantee the Projection: -
SCALE 1:250
accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 4
Page 17
Figure 5 – Vertical Clearance Clarification
The location shown within the orange
circle on SLR Figure 2 corresponds to a
structural column located to the north
of Section 1 and would not be above
the trafficable ramp lanes.
The location shown within the red circle
on SLR Figure 2 corresponds to the
location, also shown within the red
circle of the Buchan Sections drawing,
for Section 1.
Page 18
LY
ON
T
EP
NC
CO
L16 175 EAGLE STREET
Project No: 620.30769 SWEPT PATH LEGEND
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd
BRISBANE CITY 4000 Vehicle Path
AUSTRALIA Date: 19/05/22 Vehicle Body
T: 61 7 3858 4800 Noosaville Hofmann Drive Medical Centre
www.slrconsulting.com Drawn by: BR Body Clearance
N
Front Wheels
Scale: AS SHOWN Basement 02 Turnaround Swept
The content contained within this document may
Sheet Size: A3
0.0 1 2 3 4 Path B99
be based on third party data. METRES
SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd does not Projection: (GDA94) MGA Zone SCALE 1:100
guarantee the accuracy of any such information. FIGURE 6
Used in these records
RFI - Appendix C Traffic Engineering Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.