08/0169 - Copy DERM information request · 132008.169

Section 2

ecoaccess ~

environmental licences and permits
Notice

information Request — EPA as Concurrence Agency

  

(a) all of the information reque 055 (30
(b) part of the intormapiog rook Sted together with a notice asking the requesting authority to proceed with

the assessment th le application; or

(c) anotice -

(i) stating that the applicant does not intend to supply any of the information requested; and

{it) asking the requesting authority to proceed with the assessment of application.
Under Section 3.2.12(2)(b), the application lapses if the applicant does not respond to the information
request within 12 months.
‘A response to the information request should be posted to Daniel Rose, the Project Manager, at the address
below. Please do not hesitate to contact Danie! Rose, on the telephone number listed below if you wish to
discuss any of these issues or if you require any further information. ,

Yours sincerely

Te

Deena Murray . Enquiries: .
Delegate ES - SEQ North - Sunshine Coast - DERM
Environmental Services SEQ North PO Box 168 .
DERM COTTON TREE QLD 4558

Phone: 07 5459 6132
9-December-2009 Fax: 07 5443 9927

Attachment — Information Request

 

Page 2 of 4+ : Department of Environment and Resource Management

Section 3

--ecoaccess . a
environmental licences and permits . * 4

Notice
Information Request - EPA as Concurrence Agency

- Sao = wus

 

 

 

Information Request

, : EPA Project Reference Number: 323312
Date of Request: 9-December-2009

Permit Type: Concurrence Response for a MCU within a coastal management district
a : “ "

a : a an . woe an 4 a
a . a : : vot . wf
Act: Integrated Planning Act 1997

cgeee Teee AN weet, vd oy x? ~

a . a t ae

. . . : Po Me : be ae i

ave ee . i . . wont . 1.
q

‘ Activity: -MCU completely or partly within a coastal management district if the MCU involves certain
operational work

"
l-

TV

 

Information Required: Information addressing key coastal plan policies

4

crit ee

The Development Application should demonstrate how the proposed development. will not compromise
< - coastal management outcomes and processes as per Policy 2.2.2 Erosion prone areas of the State Coastal
Management Plan (SCMP) 2001. Specifically, the SCMP states that:

apenas ap) ent

4 “To the extent practicable, erosion prone areas.are to remain undeveloped apart from acceptable
5 temporary or relocatable structures for safety and recreational purposes.”

“Where building works and activities have been undertaken within an erosion prone area, future use © °
should not be at a greater intensity than the existing level. Redevelopment of these areas or an increase
in intensity may only occur in circumstances where it can be clearly demonstrated that it would not
compromise coastal management outcomes and principles.”

“In areas under constant threat of erosion, a‘strategy of retreat from erosion prone areas is the preferred
option. However, where an.area has.been developed to a scale and intensity that the retreat option is not
, achievable, property protection ‘works may be neéded to defend land uses and infrastructure from coastal :
’ processes. In such circumstances, any further building or infrastructure including extensions to existing .
. ___ buildings or the location of services (including water, power and sewerage), should not extend tany further
seaward than the existing building alignment for the neighbouring properties.”

“For developed areas, structural engineering and stabilisation works will be initiated only as a last resort

where erosion presents an immediate threat to public safety or property and infrastructure. that is not

: expendable. The siting, design and materials used for works will not cause any significant adverse

2 impacts on the. coastal resources of the location nor interrupt the natural cycles of érosion and accretion
of beaches.”

« Provide justification for the building works to be in the erosion prone area, consistent with this Policy
(e.g. structures are temporary or relocatable).

e Drawing number 180_sk103 of development application (SCRE application number '2008/169) identifies
a line described as the “natural outline of human habitat area”. Provide justification: h nethdddlogy for - :
arriving at this outline (i.e. line is not representative of an outline of existing permanent / jonsexpendable bot
Private Property infrastructure and buildings). ‘

” . "

 

 

- .

 

Page 3 of 4¢

Section 4

ecoaccess ~

environmental licences and permits
Notice

Information Request —- EPA as Concurrence Agency

¢ DERM will consider conditioning that future protection works will not be allowed to be undertaken for any
development or infrastructure in the erosion prone area. In this regard, infrastructure or building works
will not be supported in the erosion prone area unless considered expendable. Demonstrate how the
works proposed in the erosion prone area (e.g. pool, decking, stormwater infrastructure, sewage system
and guest quarters — bed 5) is expendable.

G2

Deena Murray Enquiries:
Delegate ES - SEQ North - Sunshine Coast - DERM
Environmental Services SEQ North PO Box 168
DERM. COTTON TREE QLD 4558
Phone: 07 5459 6132

9-December-2009 Fax: © 07 5443 9927

 

 

Page 4 of 4+ Department of Environment and Resource Management