08/0169 - Copy DERM information request · 132008.169

--ecoaccess . a
environmental licences and permits . * 4

Notice
Information Request - EPA as Concurrence Agency

- Sao = wus

 

 

 

Information Request

, : EPA Project Reference Number: 323312
Date of Request: 9-December-2009

Permit Type: Concurrence Response for a MCU within a coastal management district
a : “ "

a : a an . woe an 4 a
a . a : : vot . wf
Act: Integrated Planning Act 1997

cgeee Teee AN weet, vd oy x? ~

a . a t ae

. . . : Po Me : be ae i

ave ee . i . . wont . 1.
q

‘ Activity: -MCU completely or partly within a coastal management district if the MCU involves certain
operational work

"
l-

TV

 

Information Required: Information addressing key coastal plan policies

4

crit ee

The Development Application should demonstrate how the proposed development. will not compromise
< - coastal management outcomes and processes as per Policy 2.2.2 Erosion prone areas of the State Coastal
Management Plan (SCMP) 2001. Specifically, the SCMP states that:

apenas ap) ent

4 “To the extent practicable, erosion prone areas.are to remain undeveloped apart from acceptable
5 temporary or relocatable structures for safety and recreational purposes.”

“Where building works and activities have been undertaken within an erosion prone area, future use © °
should not be at a greater intensity than the existing level. Redevelopment of these areas or an increase
in intensity may only occur in circumstances where it can be clearly demonstrated that it would not
compromise coastal management outcomes and principles.”

“In areas under constant threat of erosion, a‘strategy of retreat from erosion prone areas is the preferred
option. However, where an.area has.been developed to a scale and intensity that the retreat option is not
, achievable, property protection ‘works may be neéded to defend land uses and infrastructure from coastal :
’ processes. In such circumstances, any further building or infrastructure including extensions to existing .
. ___ buildings or the location of services (including water, power and sewerage), should not extend tany further
seaward than the existing building alignment for the neighbouring properties.”

“For developed areas, structural engineering and stabilisation works will be initiated only as a last resort

where erosion presents an immediate threat to public safety or property and infrastructure. that is not

: expendable. The siting, design and materials used for works will not cause any significant adverse

2 impacts on the. coastal resources of the location nor interrupt the natural cycles of érosion and accretion
of beaches.”

« Provide justification for the building works to be in the erosion prone area, consistent with this Policy
(e.g. structures are temporary or relocatable).

e Drawing number 180_sk103 of development application (SCRE application number '2008/169) identifies
a line described as the “natural outline of human habitat area”. Provide justification: h nethdddlogy for - :
arriving at this outline (i.e. line is not representative of an outline of existing permanent / jonsexpendable bot
Private Property infrastructure and buildings). ‘

” . "

 

 

- .

 

Page 3 of 4¢