Original source · versioned page text
NPM Submission - A & P Lindsay - LATE - Proforma - MCU21/0110
From: "John Yuille" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:12:16 +1000
To: "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Alastair & Pauline Lindsay" <[email protected]>;"Sabrina Yuille"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Objection to the proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs - MCU21/0110
Attachments: 211227-SignedPages-Cascades-Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa
Springs.pdf
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates
staff.
Dear Sir/Madam Chief Planning Officer,
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs: MCU 21/0110
It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time
just before Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.
No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon
existing users of Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is
significant. The “material change of use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs,
The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795 properties), resort staff and members.
The development fails so many tests:
It isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French
Quarter in Hastings Street
At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open
space”
It breaches height and setback restrictions
Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, a "Koala Priority Habitat” and if this
application is successful, this will be lost together with other fauna and flora safety
measures. Native Fauna and Flora will definitely suffer.
There is only a single narrow access road, shared by existing adjacent and significant
residential developments. With potentially 224 occupants, plus
Document Set ID: 21745477
Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022
[OCR of page images]
From: "John Yuille" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:12:16 +1000
To: "Mailbox Council Mail" <[email protected]>
Ce: "Alastair & Pauline Lindsay" <[email protected]>;"Sabrina Yuille"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Objection to the proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs - MCU21/0110
Attachments: 211227-SignedPages-Cascades-Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa
Springs. pdf
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
External sender. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual or impersonates
staff.
Dear Sir/Madam Chief Planning Officer,
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs: Mcu 21/0110
It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time
just before Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.
No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon
existing users of Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is
significant. The “material change of use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs,
The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795 properties), resort staff and members.
The development fails so many tests:
e It isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French
Quarter in Hastings Street
e At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
e Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open
space”
e It breaches height and setback restrictions
e Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, a "Koala Priority Habitat” and if this
application is successful, this will be lost together with other fauna and flora safety
measures. Native Fauna and Flora will definitely suffer.
e There is only a single narrow access road, shared by existing adjacent and significant
residential developments. With potentially 224 occupants, plus
Document Set ID: 21745477
Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (NPM Submission - A & P Lindsay - LATE - Proforma - MCU21_0110.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 1 page
Page 2
children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation risk will be significantly
increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions with Council
in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis Body
Corporate Review of Emergency Evacuation Provisions.
The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or
public transport. This is just not realistic
The already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use
the spa, gym, medical facilies, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times
and the Parking Studies lack meaningful analysis
There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside
and this will affect the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their
security and safety
The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to
residents and members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will
likely be given priority
The developers are potenally “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a
hotel was used to build Parkridge.
Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.
I object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.
A
--
John Yuille
M: 04397 56620
PO Box 1090, Tewantin,Queensland, Australia, 4565
Document Set ID: 21745477
Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022
[OCR of page images]
children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation risk will be significantly
increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions with Council
in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis Body
Corporate Review of Emergency Evacuation Provisions.
e The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or
public transport. This is just not realistic
e The already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use
the spa, gym, medical facilies, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times
and the Parking Studies lack meaningful analysis
e There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside
and this will affect the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their
security and safety
e The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to
residents and members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will
likely be given priority
e The developers are potenally “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a
hotel was used to build Parkridge.
Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.
| object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.
A Xiyved yoy od ovp ofgExtiov to attTayNEd.
TnavK you,
Sonv avd LaBpiva PorAs
GUAG 128, Tne Xaoyadeo, Noooa Zmpivyo, 61 Noooa =mpiwyo Apiae,
Noooa Heasdo.
John Yuille
M: 04397 56620
PO Box 1090, Tewantin,Queensland, Australia, 4565
Document Set ID: 21745477
Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022