Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Development Application part 10 of 10 Community Study - MCU13/0092

of 76

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (34.8 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

                                                                                     -
                                                                                         50-


FURTHER COMMENTS BY PARTICIPANTS




Q7   -
         Before I complete the interview are there any comments you wish to

make about what you understand about this proposed shopping develop-

ment?

The following are verbatim comments by participants.

 Comments Su~~ortive of Pro~osal            Comments Not Su~~ortive of Pro~osal

 Happy to such a development but not        Go away. Don’t want it. Stop trying to

 destroy current village ambience.          commercialise our neighbourhood.

 OK, if it is locally owned and managed.    Not in favour. Keep area zoned as is.

 Would be good for Peregian.                Unnecessary. Contrary to Town Planner

 Only if pharmacy, newsagent and Post       Because there has already been devel-

 office wanted to go and weren’t forced     opment approved that will be more than
 to or are duplicated.                      adequate for the area
 The Square should stay as a social         There is a community centre and park

 area and the    shopping precinct could    nearby: a supermarket would make it too
 be a little away where it is proposed.     busy for children to be safe.
 Can’t stop progress. Keep it small.        The Village Square is already adequate.

 Local ownership essential                  Whole area should be kept as natural as

                                            possible

 Brings money back to the community         Absolutely against any supermarket de-
 and attracts more people to spend time     velopment. It will impact negatively on
 here                                       business in the area.

 Would be convenient. Close to where I      If they put an entrance via David Low Way

 live                                       it would be bedlam with only one lane.

 I do worry about the local business but    It’s not needed. We’ve got plenty of fresh

 I don’t see the Square as a place for      produce coming from local farmers at the
 convenient shopping. It is more a place    local fruit and vege shop and community

 for social meetings                        co-op.




 Happy for it to bring more people to the   It’s zoned recreational land. Sports facili-

 village. Could be good for existing        ties should be a priority. We have enough

 businesses                                 large supermarkets within a short drive
                                            and this will affect Peregian Springs busi-

                                            nesses. It’s   only a 5   -
                                                                          10min drive.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
34.8 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Application part 10 of 10 Community Study - MCU13_0092.pdf · 34.8 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.