Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Council archive · source document

Development Application part 10 of 10 Community Study - MCU13/0092

of 76

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (34.8 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

                                                                                 -
                                                                                      54-


When asked to indicate their level of support for a ’Peregian Beach Marketplace’

as   depicted in the material the participants were shown,
      o   35% of participants indicated they would be supportive

      o   10% of participants indicated a neither/nor or don’t know response

      o   55% of participants indicated they would not be supportive

When asked to indicate what they believe the level of support from those local to

the area for a ’Peregian Beach Marketplace’ as depicted in the material the par-

ticipants were shown,
     o    29% of participants indicated that those local to the area would be sup-

          portive

     o    12% of participants indicated a neither/nor or don’t know response

     o    59% of participants indicated that those local to the area would not be

          supportive.


In response to gauging levels of agreement to the following statements in re-

gards to the site, participants indicated some division.


’We need to smarten up the place (site being discussed); it is looking stressed,

old and tired.’

     o    42% of participants agreed

     o    12% of participants indicated a neither/nor or don’t know response

     o    46% of participants did not agree



’The area of the now defunct Bowls Club area is becoming an eyesore and di-

minishes the perception of Peregian Beach as a vibrant, engaging community.’

     o    35% of participants agreed

     o    9% of participants indicated a neither/nor or don’t know response

     o    56% of participants did not agree



In response to concepts of the proposed development, the overall distribution

was more    supportive of the development of a convenience centre that provided
quality and variety of food products at costs similar to the IGA marketplace con-

cept stores, particularly if:

     o    it included a carefully planned mixed of consumer goods to provide opti-

          mum   benefit for both residents and visitors, and would complement exist-

          ing businesses
     o    it was a single level, lower set building with bush-style landscaping ap-

          propriate to the existing vegetation of the area with some 100 generous
          size parking bays

Used in these records

About this file

File size
34.8 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Application part 10 of 10 Community Study - MCU13_0092.pdf · 34.8 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.