Original source · versioned page text
K - Preliminary Arborist Report (29.08.2019)
APPENDIX TWO: tree categorisation (BS5837-2012)
The purpose of the tree categorisation method is to identify the quality and value (in a non-fiscal sense) of an existing
tree, allowing informed decisions to be made concerning which trees should be removed or retained in the event of
development occurring.
Trees unsuitable for retention Category U: Those in such a condition that they cannot realistically be retained as living
trees in the context of the current land use for longer than 10 years
o trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to
collapse, including those that will become unviable after removal of other category U trees (e.g. where, for
whatever reason, the loss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning);
o trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible overall decline; and
o trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees nearby, or very low-
quality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality
NOTE: Category U trees can have existing or potential conservation value which it might be desirable to preserve.
TREE TO BE MAINLY ARBORICILTURAL QUALITIES MAINLY LANDSCAPE QUALITIES MAINLY CULTURAL VALUES
CONSIDERED FOR INCLUDING CONSERVATION
RETENTION
Category A – Trees of Trees that are particularly good examples of Trees, groups or woodlands of particular Trees, groups or woodlands of significant
high quality with an their species, especially if rare or unusual; or visual importance as arboricultural and/or conservation, historical, commemorative or
estimated remaining life those that are essential components of groups or landscape features other value (e.g. veteran trees or wood-
expectancy of at least 40 formal or semi-formal arboricultural features pasture)
years (e.g. the dominant and/or principal trees within
an avenue)
Category B – Trees of Trees that might be included in category A, but Trees present in numbers, usually growing as Trees with material conservation or other
moderate quality with an are downgraded because of impaired condition groups or woodlands, such that they attract cultural value
estimated remaining life (e.g. presence of significant though remediable a higher collective rating than they might as
expectancy of at least 20 defects, including unsympathetic past individuals; or trees occurring as collectives
years management and storm damage), such that they but situated so as to make little visual
are unlikely to be suitable for retention for contribution to the wider locality
beyond 40 years; or trees lacking the special
quality necessary to merit the category A
designation
Category C -Trees of low Unremarkable trees of very limited merit or such Trees present in groups or woodlands, but Trees with no material conservation or
quality with an estimated impaired condition that they do not qualify in without this conferring on them significantly other culture values
remaining life expectancy higher categories greater collective landscape value; and/or
of at least 10 years, or trees offering low or only
young trees with a stem temporary/transient landscape benefits
diameter below 150mm
Page39
PAR: V2
©Treescience Pty Ltd –uncontrolled when printed
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.