Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Joanne Case - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
ADDENDUM 2‐ EFFECTIVE PLANNING POINTS THAT DEFEND THE INTREGRITY OF
THE NOOSA PLAN
I strongly object to the inclusion of the housing estate in this proposal, but in particular,
the lack of visitor accommodation being provided as required by the Noosa Plan.
The proposed development significantly conflicts with the Noosa Plan for the following
reasons:
The proposed development being located within the Open Space Recreation
Zone does not contribute to the desired lifestyle of residents because it does not
offer a variety of passive and active recreational experiences that are conducive
to community interaction and wellbeing;
The proposed development seeks to provide a small lot housing development
and, in particular, Multiple Housing Type 4 – Conventional which is not a
consistent use in the Open Space Recreation Zone;
The proposed development seeks to provide Visitor Accommodation Type 4, but
not in association with Visitor Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not
consistent with the Open Space Recreation Zone;
The proposed application appears to reflect an incorrect site cover percentage
where some structures have not been included in the calculation. An example of
this is the stair and entry for the Reed Beach Houses (refer pages SD12 and
SD23). This is a clear omission and indicates that either the developer is seeking
to misrepresent the proposed site cover or they have been inaccurate in their
calculations by error. In either case the Noosa Council has an absolute duty to
reject the application until all inaccuracies have been identified and included in
the Council’s deliberations on whether this DA should be accepted.
The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach caravan park
site for low cost visitor accommodation;
Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but is not
integrated as part of a caravan park use or other form of budget
accommodation;
The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited to be
attractive, comfortable and accessible to the public or provide suitable
landscape treatments and amenities, conducive to community interaction and
convenience and public safety;
The proposed development is not consistent with the reasonable expectations of
residents in the locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan site is to primarily
provide for budget visitor accommodation, which is in the public interest;
11
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Joanne Case - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Joanne Case - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 897 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.