Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission Object - Joanne Case - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 16

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

raise real doubts as to whether or not any of these houses will be built. This is especially the
case if the developer requires a 60 percent pre‐commitment before commencing
construction. Council, of course, could not consider the proposed pricing of these houses as
low cost or budget accommodation. While this is the developer’s risk, it has a bearing on
the completion of the proposed Stage 2 with the visitor accommodation.

Therefore, the completion of Stage 2, which contains the developer’s limited commitment
to visitor accommodation must be seriously doubted.

I ask that Council consider the sincerity of the developer in providing visitor
accommodation when it is left to Stage 2 and the developer’s record to date of having built
no visitor accommodation since 2009.

5. Disruption to Peregian Village and surrounding areas during construction if this DA is
approved
5.1 Engineering Services Report – Page 5 in Response 2B states:‐

“There will be earthworks required to facilitate construction of stormwater treatment
facilities, sanitary drainage and allow for an aesthetically pleasing and functional built form.
There is little opportunity for fill material to be won on site therefore most of the fill
material will need to be imported”.

While the total amount of fill required does not seem to have been identified Figure 6
“illustrates the ‘swampy’ nature of the lower area of the site in the vicinity of the proposed
gabion wall” and states that “a fill wall of approximately 2.0m will be required”.

I agree with the comment at page 10 of 13 in the Information Request “that the extent of
filling of the site may need to be reduced.”

COMMENT: The imported fill will all have to come in via Sandpiper Lane and on the access
road to the IGA and the other shops. It will therefore, directly and significantly affect them
and the Hardware store. This will involve considerable noise and disruption from the source
of the fill to the development and return. It will also cause considerable disruption to the
roundabout at the village and to the Peregian Beach Hotel and other premises in that area.

COMMENT: The importation of fill will result in the creek, which seems to have been
ignored in the DA, being diverted to run through the Council Reserve.

5.2 Engineering Services Report – Page 7 in Response 2B
I query why water reticulation is proposed down the pedestrian access lane to the Peregian
Beach Sports Ground (Lot 75 on MCH839108) and a
Unity Water meter is proposed at the Peregian Beach Sports Ground boundary rather than
on the developers property

I also query why Electricity supply will be provided by “installing underground infrastructure
down the Peregian Sports Reserve access strip” rather than through the developers
property.


                                                                                              7

Used in these records

About this file

File size
897 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Joanne Case - MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 897 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.