GSLC development application objection (2) (1)

4. NON COMPLIANCE WITH RELEVANT PLANNING INSTRUMENTS:
The Applicant has completely failed to address the numerous and significant potential impacts of the
proposed Development on the adjoining School. The following specific areas of non-compliance are
noted:


 Code Objective                  Developer’s Assessment         Objectors’ Assessment

 RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE

 O9 The subdivision layout is    O9 Complies:                   Does not Comply
 designed to facilitate          The proposal will comply       The phrase “reasonably applicable” is
 linkages with adjoining sites   where reasonably applicable.   unclear and the specific linkages with
 in the immediate area.                                         adjoining sites in the immediate area
                                                                have not been considered or
                                                                adequately addressed.

 O10 Where the lots are to be    O10 Complies :                 Does not Comply
 used for Industrial business    Landscaped buffering has       The layout does not provide for
 or Commercial business          been provided along all        appropriate buffer areas, to mitigate
 uses, the layout provides for   boundaries adjoining the       possible impacts on the adjacent
 appropriate buffer areas, to    school to the east.            School. Landscape buffering is
 mitigate possible impacts on                                   insufficient and ineffective to mitigate
 nearby residences or other                                     the negative impacts, including those
 noise sensitive uses                                           of fugitive emissions, of the
                                                                Development.
 O12 An adequate and             S12.1- 12.2 Complies           Does not Comply
 accessible water supply is      Will comply as applicable.     The Applicant has not adequately
 provided for fire fighting                                     addressed the issue of fire safety and
 purposes.                                                      its potential impacts, particularly
                                                                given the proximity of the
                                                                Development to the adjacent School.
 O32 Access easements are in     S32.1 Complies                 Does not Comply
 appropriate locations for       It is considered that the      The proposed access is not
 safe access and egress, and     proposed access easement       appropriate for the Development and
 supply appropriate widths       has been designed in           does not provide safe access and
 and levels of service for the   accordance with Sections 2     egress nor does it provide for the
 number of vehicles that will    and 3 of PSP5 Engineering      appropriate level of safety of school
 utilise them                    Design Standards – Roads,      children given its proximity to the
                                 Drainage and Earthworks.       School

 O33 Traffic generated by the    S33.1 Complies                 Does not Comply
 development is within the       The development will comply    “reasonably applicable” is
 acceptable capacity of          where reasonably applicable.   indeterminate. The proposed
 external roads and does not                                    Development does have an adverse
 have an adverse impact                                         impact upon the functioning of the
 upon the functioning of the                                    road network. The Applicant has



                                                                                                     12