GSLC development application objection (2) (1)

Code Objective                  Developer’s Assessment            Objectors’ Assessment

                                there considered that 10          The Applicant furthermore provides
                                spaces is appropriate.            no justification for its derived value of
                                                                  10 other than it is what will fit on the
                                                                  site given its proposed configuration.

                                                                  Furthermore the Applicant provides
                                                                  no data or objective evidence by way
                                                                  of survey, industry statistics or
                                                                  otherwise to justify its assessment of
                                                                  the likely number of users of the
                                                                  service station to refuel vehicles
                                                                  versus to use the retail facility. The
                                                                  number is simply derived to fit with
                                                                  the number configurable on the
                                                                  Property and within the design
                                                                  proposed by the Applicant.

                                                                  It is the Applicant’s responsibility to
                                                                  provide a compliant design - the
                                                                  current design is clearly non-
                                                                  compliant and must be rejected.


O9 Parking areas are located    O9 Complies                       Does not Comply
where they will not unduly      Car parking is located at the     The Applicant states that the car park
conflict with pedestrians and   front of the building, the most   is located to be “the most suitable
will not dominate the           suitable location for a service   location for a service station use”
streetscape.                    station use.                      which is not the requirement but a
                                                                  function of the proposed design.

                                                                  The Applicant has failed to address
                                                                  the requirement and demonstrate
                                                                  that Parking areas are located where
                                                                  they will not unduly conflict with
                                                                  pedestrians. The Applicant has failed
                                                                  to address the requirement and
                                                                  demonstrate that parking areas are
                                                                  located where they will not unduly
                                                                  conflict with pedestrians and will not
                                                                  dominate the streetscape.

O11 Access and egress                                             Does not Comply
points do not impact on the                                       Given the nature of the development
safety and operations of the                                      and proximity to the School the



                                                                                                            22