Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 2 - Phase 7 Project Summary Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Noosa Shire Council Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan: Project Summary 29
Findings
and sea level rise inundation, followed by reducing the intensity of future development. While some
of the properties already have river walls, crest heights are low. Raising crest levels is ranked higher
than levees and land buy back, all of which mitigate risks to the road network from sea level rise,
with the exception of road impacts around the Noosa North Shore end of the Noosa River Ferry
landing. Tidal gates at the mouth of the Noosa River is the lowest ranked option to mitigate against
inundation risks in this area.
3.5.8 Lake Cootharaba
Assets at high or very high risk from storm tide and/or sea level rise inundation in this locality are the
Boreen Point Campground and areas of National Park / conservation importance fringing the Lake.
As there is uncertainty on the extent of built assets within conservation areas, design of hazard
resilient infrastructure was the highest ranked option for managing sea level rise, closely followed by
habitat migration. Major built infrastructure to reduce risks to conservation areas all rated poorly,
including levees and tidal gates.
At Boreen Point Campground, the option ratings for storm tide were similar, although opportunities
to relocate important infrastructure landward ranked higher than implementation of measures such
as seawall, levees and tidal gates.
3.5.9 Summary
Coastal hazard adaptation options that rated favourably (albeit, many requiring further investigation)
in the MCA process at localities within Noosa Shire are summarised in Table 3-2.
Table 3-2 Summary of Preferred Adaptation Options
Locality Potential Adaptation Options (in order of Adaptation Hierarchy
preference) Approach
Peregian to Sunshine Active dune and habitat management Accommodate (short term)
Beaches Manual creek mouth management Planned transition (long term)
Community infrastructure management
Land buy back
Relocate important infrastructure
Beach nourishment
Dune augmentation
Noosa Heads Design of hazard resilient infrastructure Accommodate
Tide flaps and valves on stormwater pipe network
Active dune and habitat management
Dune augmentation
Improve sand shifter efficiency
Teewah Active dune and habitat management Accommodate
Beach nourishment
Dune augmentation
Noosaville Design of hazard resilient infrastructure Accommodate
Tide flaps and valves on stormwater pipe network
Raising road levels
Levees
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.