Original source · versioned page text
2021-01-18 GC - Item 3 - Attachment 2 - Phase 7 Project Summary Coastal Hazards Adaptation Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Shire Council Coastal Hazard Adaptation Plan: Project Summary 33
Conclusions and Recommendations
Locality Recommended Adaptation Options Recommended Adaptation
Hierarchy Approach
Noosa North Shore Design of hazard resilient infrastructure Avoid/Prepare
Reduce intensity of future development
Lake Cootharaba Design of hazard resilient infrastructure Prepare
Relocate important infrastructure
Land management to support habitat migration
The feedback received during public consultation throughout the project thus far has been for Council
to focus on less intrusive solutions to minimising these potential risks such as nature-based solutions
(i.e. beach management and dune augmentation) on the open coast, rather than hard (less
reversible) interventions such as seawalls or levees. This was borne out by both the options
assessment (Phase 6) and more detailed Cost-Benefit Analysis (Phase 7). particularly for the open
coast areas which favoured ‘lighter touch’ options. For the settlement of Teewah, on the coast north
of Noosa, a planned transition was favoured by the CBA. Where inundation from sea level rise or
stormtide is the predominant hazard, the Cost-Benefit Analysis has favoured intervention such as
the construction of levees or infrastructure upgrades where there is significant public infrastructure
and properties at risk. The probable timing for these interventions is for adaptation options to be in
place by 2070. The study also found that planning controls may also be used to support nature-
based solutions, and thus could be included in a suite of complementary measures that are
consistent with the feedback received.
4.1 Additional considerations
While natural options such as dune augmentation and beach nourishment ranked highly in open
coast areas, uncertainty remains as to the most economical and reliable sources of sand that can be
used for this purpose. It is strongly recommended that investigations into possible sand sources for
these purposes are undertaken in the near future, with a view to securing long-term access, statutory
approvals and funding for implementation and a clear and sequenced action plan. This is especially
important given there may be a need to address the impacts of erosion promptly following extreme
storm events.
The concept design for inundation protection measures i.e. levees should also be further developed
to gain a deeper understanding of design options and costs.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.