Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Lois Leslie
4. Conllnn that the 10U"",ing ma!l<!atory supporting information ~ceornpanles this applieatlon
Mandatory supporting intonnation COnnnnation of Method of
lodgement lodgement
AUapplitations
A site plan drawn 10 an appt>pliate scale (1:100.1:200 or 1:500 are [;}confinned
recommended salles) which showo the rOlOwing:
• Ihe locaUon and site .rea of !he Ian<! 10which the epplicalioo relates
(reIe- land)
• llUI nonh poin!
• Ihe boundanes or the relevanlland
any road fronlages 01 the relevant land, including the name 0' the mad
•
• Ihelocotlon and use of any existing or p~ ~uOldlng. or strIJelu ••••
on the relevant land (n01e: wner. extem;jye demollUon or new I>JlIdlngs
are proposM. t.vo separate plans Ian .".;stIng site plan and Pf'lIlO5O<l sile
plsn) may bl> appropliale)
• 3ny existing or proposed easements on the mev.nlland
f~on
and their
• the lacetion and use 01 ~uildlngs on land adjoining the relevant land
""y
• all vehicle aocess points and existing or proposed car pal1<ing ••.• as
on the relovantland. Car parking spaces lor persons with disabilities and
any •• rvice vehicle a<:<ess and parklllQ should be clearly mart<b:l
• to<any new l>Jildlng on the ",levant land, tho Joea1loo ot "'fuse storage !
• tne location ot any proposed ret.iring wall. on lIle relevanlland and ttlelr
height '
.
I
• tne locetlon of any proposed landscaping on ttl. rel~vanl land
• th8 tocatlon 01 any 5tOrmwaler d tentJon on the relevant latlc:l . j
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided de.monstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involvos new operational \'Iork
Plans snowing Ine nalure. locallon. number of new on-silo eer p3r1d"IJ ~8y$, .0confirmed
proposed area of new landscaping, proposed type at new vehlcl. cross-over
(n~Sidential uses). proposed maximum new vehicular ••••••ang
o Not appllca~e
a"angoman! (non-resldenllal uses) of tne proposed new operational wort..
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
705m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Lois LeslieRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.