Original source · versioned page text
2014-06-23 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 23 JUNE 2014
REPORTS TO GENERAL COMMITTEE
1 CONTRIBUTION IN LIEU OF THE PROVISION OF OFF STREET PARKING - FURTHER
REPORT
OCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Senior Strategic Planner, Anne Wilson
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM\Project and Contract\PP-02 Carparking
Attachments Nil
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Senior Strategic Planner to the General Committee Meeting
dated 23 June 2014 and request Strategic Land Use Planning to prepare a detailed report
addressing the feasibility of accepting contributions in lieu of the provision of off-street parking
within each locality and, in the interim, not accept monetary contributions in lieu of the provision
of off-street parking.
REPORT
A report relating to accepting contributions from applicants in lieu of the provision of off-street
parking was considered by the Planning and Organisation Committee on 17 June 2014 (refer to
Item 4 on Page 66) and was subsequently referred to the General Committee meeting on 23
June 2014.
During the course of discussions at the Planning and Organisation Committee the following
matters amongst other things were raised:
Planning Scheme Policy (PSP13) Contributions in Lieu of the Provision of Off-Street
Parking was removed from the Noosa Plan (under the direction of the State) in September
2013.
At the current time Council has no policy position to guide applicants and/or planning
officers regarding whether a contribution in lieu of off-street parking may be acceptable in
specific circumstances. If Council decides not to adopt a policy any application that does
not comply with the Noosa Plan Driveway and Carparking Code would be recommended
for refusal.
The advantages of not accepting monetary contributions in lieu of off-street carparking
need to be considered. One distinct advantage is that Council does not have to bear the
cost of establishing and maintaining new carparking facilities or alternative transport
arrangements.
A detailed study for relevant town centres or commercial precincts is required as each is
likely to have different requirements and circumstances.
Councillors requested an alternative motion indicating contributions will not be accepted in
lieu of onsite parking until a detailed review on the matter is undertaken. An alternative
motion is provided above.
Page 4 of 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.