Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

ECM_21876434_v1_Information Request MCU22 0039 (1)

Attached to the e-mail MCU220039 55 and 70 Carpenters Rd Cooroy - Information request.msg.

of 7
Issue – Bushfire Code
Assessment against the Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code has not been provided.
Information Required
22. Provide an assessment detailing how the proposed development meets the Bushfire
    Hazard Overlay Code requirements.
23. Provide further information as to the suitability of


Issue – Bushfire Code - Landscaping
As a Landscape Concept Plan is required to be provided, the Bushfire Risk Assessment and
Bushfire Risk Management Plan needs to assess the bushfire risk taking into consideration
the proposed landscaping plan.
Information Required
24. Review the Bushfire Plan to ensure it has been assessed taking into consideration the
    proposed Landscape Concept Plan including screening buffer planting along boundaries.


Issue – Bushfire Plan
Incomplete sections of the Bushfire Plan.
Information Required
25. Section 6.6 appears to be incomplete. What is the asset protection zone distance
    required? Section 7.2 recommends a 10m setback from retained vegetation. Please
    update the report and complete section 6.6 with appropriate diagrams detailing the location
    of the asset protection zone in relation to the proposed development.
26. Recommendation for Part of the Bushfire Risk Assessment (p7) details:
      The development does not unduly burden emergency services as there is good access
      for firefighting appliances, good fire fighting space, good water supply and contributes
      only one extra building in the emergency services area.
   The comments refers to one extra building in the emergency services area. Please provide
   clarification as to how this one building relates to the proposed development of 34 units.


Issue – Bushfire Mapping
Figure 11 of the Bushfire Hazard Assessment Report shows Bushfire Intensity however the
intensity levels do not match the Noosa Plan mapping which includes a large portion of the
Lot being mapped as High Potential Bushfire Intensity. Is Figure 11 due to assessment
determining the State and Noosa Plan mapping is incorrect?
Information Required
27. Provide justification for the difference in mapping intensity.




                                                                                       Page 5 of 7

Log in to download the original (ECM_21876434_v1_Information Request MCU22 0039 (1).pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.