Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

09/1024 - MCU - Detached House [As Published] · 132009.1024

of 34

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

ENVIRONMENTALLY RELEVANT ACTIVITY; WILD RIVER AREA (continued)

 

if no, is any ERA an extraction ERA intended to be located outside waters?

oO No — Unless the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, and the application is accompanied by
an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Form 1, Part G). This application requires
assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmental Protection Act 1994 and the Wild Rivers Act
2008. if the Administering Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence
Agency,

(Yes

lfyes, does the ERA meet the following?
(i) _ the activity is located inside a flood management area and a borrow pit of not (1 No!(] Yes
more than 10,000m' for -

« specified works under the Wild Rivers Act 2005; or
+ residential complexes, as defined under the Environmental Protection Act 1994

\ (ii) _ the activity is located outside a flood management area (1 No|( Yes:

 

 

 

 

If yes to either (i) or (ii) above - Uniess the application is consistent with any property development plan applying to the land, and
the application is accompanied by an allocation notice, the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it. (Complete Form 1,
Part G). This application requires assessment by the Administering Authority for the purposes of both the Environmentat
Protection Act 1994 and, subject to the declaration for the relevant wild river area, the Wild Rivers Act 2005. if the Administering
Authority is not the Assessment Manager for the appfication, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

If no to both (i) and (ii) above - An application for the ERA will be taken to be not properly made and the Assessment manager must
refuse to receive it

IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 2. item 1; IPA, schedule 8, part 1, table 5, items 3 and 4; iP Regulation, schedule 2. lable 2, ilems 1 and 23; Environmental Protection Act 1994, section 73AA (wild
siver area); Wild Rivers Act 2005, section 434; relevant wild river declaration; Wild Rivers Code.

 

wt THe LIMITS.OF A PORT: Eat

   

: es

 

14

part of the premises wai the limits of a ort under the Transport infrastructure Act 7 9a?
jo-Gotoa1s [] Yes
If yes, is that part of the premises below high water mark?
(1) No
LJ Yes - ifanswers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule
8 - Answer (a) to (c} below. This application requires assessment by the Port Authority for the land. if you answer no to (a), (b) and
(c) below, the Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Advice Agency.
{a) _ Is any part of the proposal within 200m of a shipping channel or an entry and exit shipping corridor for the Port?
CINo (1 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
(b) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a swing basin, a commercial fishing wharf, a mooring, anchorage or spoil grounds?
CINo (11 Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

{c) Is any part of the proposal within 1,000m of a planned port facility identified in a land use plan?
0) No oO Yes - The Port Authority for the Port has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.
IP Reguiation, schedule 2, table 2. items 15 and 16.

 

 

‘DECLARED FISH: HABITAT. AREA

 

 

15

 

BA any part of the premises adjoin a declared fish habitat a area a under the Fisheries Act 1994?

No - Goto Q1.6
LO Yes - if answers to questions in other sections of this checklist indicate that the proposed development is assessable under IPA, schedule 8,
this application requires assessment by the Department of Primary industries and Fisheries (DPI&F). If DPI&F is not the Assessment
Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Advice Agency. = — = ——~- et

 

 

 

 

[IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 2 tem 26

 

Page 4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
6.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

09_1024 - MCU - Detached House [As Published].pdf · 6.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.