Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

2019-09-30 Special Meeting Agenda

of 17

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA   30 SEPTEMBER 2019




                              Page 16 of 17

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA                                                    30 SEPTEMBER 2019

 PBCAI submits that there is a considerable difference between the short-term visitor
 accommodation provided in a Motel and that provided by the dwellings which have
 been approved for this development.
 Firstly, the Motel units are one and two bedroom units. The dwellings are 3 and 4
 bedroom dwellings and some are even being advertised as 5 bedroom dwellings.
 Secondly, the price for a Motel unit would vary considerably from that for one of
 these 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings. The dwellings are advertised for sale from
 $750,000 to $1,025,000. (Kamala from $750,000, Marram from $750,000, Wallum
 from $915,000, Lily from $925,000 and Saltbush from $1,025,000) which would
 suggest investors may require a rate of retum much higher than a Motel unit price.
 Thirdly, Motel units are available by the night whereas 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings
 usually have a minimum number of nights, frequently exceeding 7. They frequently
 require payment in advance and also payment of a security deposit.
 THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
 The so called “Construction Impacts” of the dwellings on the operation of the Motel, if
 completed in Stage 1, have not changed since Thomco agreed to the Motel being
 given prionty in mid 2017. Giving the Motel priority removed one reason for the
 rejection of Thomco's development application, as it gave certainty to the provision
 of short-term visitor accommodation.
 Thomco obviously did not want to raise any significance of the construction impacts
 while it sought to have the rejection of its development application overturned by the
 appeal.
 Thomco was prepared to settle the appeal as recently as 21 June 2019 without any
 reference to these newly raised “Construction Impacts”.
 NOT A MINOR CHANGE UNDER SECTION 78
 PBCAI submits that this approval requires Thomco to build the Motel with priority
 (Stage 1) because of Council's and the community's need for the short-term visitor
 accommodation provided by a Motel.
 For Thomco to propose to vary this recent approval to firstly build the 20 by 3, 4 and
 5 bedroom dwellings is a considerable change, not a “minor change”, from what was
 approved.
 PBCAI submits that the proposal to build the 20 by 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings
 first, without any guarantee that the short-term visitor accommodation provided by
 the Mote! will be built requires public notification. Without the Motel, and the short-
 term visitor accommodation this is a substantially different development. It is almost
 the small lot housing development Thomco initially sought.
 For Thomco to propose to build the 20 by 3, 4 and 5 bedroom dwellings first, without
 providing any guarantee that it intends to build the Motel is disingenuous when it is

                                                                              3

                                                                                  Page 16 of 17
Log in to download the original file

2019-09-30 Special Meeting Agenda(PDF, 975KB).pdf · 998 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.