Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-06-01 General Committee Agenda

of 44

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA      1 JUNE 2015
                                   ATTACHMENT 1




                                     Page 34 of 44

ATTACHMENT 1

be            eel Onone
                  ay        es ee

 CONTRACT TITLE                          NCC Refurbishment
 CONTRACT NO:                          | 14150019 __
 ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST:              ——_ $180,000
 CONTRACT TYPE:                          (CD Public Tender/EO! J Request for Quote [} Supplier Arrangement        |
   OO                      -        "EVALUATION PANEL DECLARATION                                7                |
 As an Evaluation Panel member, | declare that | have read, understood, and accept the Probity Requirements
 overleaf.                                             NAME                   SIGNATURE                DATE       |
 CONTRACT SPONSOR(S)                                                                   (            eT
 $200,000-8250,000 CEO                        sian Sect) Ragas              Yi Gin.     te    wet       ah.
 Up te $200,000 Department Director                                                                              =
 >$250,000 Council                                                                              *
                                                                  “                       Mi                   _
       Chair (Procurement Coordinator)        -Alan-{Fox) Rogers           (A... —tsamt-              3215
| — | Contract Administrator                  Greg Tucker                 teh        lS                care       |
3      RE                                                                   mS                       An 2\SI.
;       echnical expert (can be an external               33
;o     consultant or community representative - ne ae       wo                    )          a        \y 2s iS”
  &     company name of external party required!   .           soe!              APP
  =                                                                                   .     sare     =            i
  <   | Health & Safety representative        John McCarron                                           Ff. 37S
  =   |                                                               il                                eS
  = | Independent members                                                        .-  ee                       a5
  w | (Council Officer independent of the      Steve de Jong                    ot       $          4.2.75 _ |}
       Contract Administrator’s branch)                                       7                                 a
       Didi  cian ematinos                   | Ems O'Neill, Ei                 im                      ius
                                                       "Nei                  Biv kk                 Feds           |
  SE                   ee ne                        n                      Eee                    S-255
  ——
                                                                                RATIONALE
         Se ee                            WEIGHTING               Reasons for criteria and applied weightings
| Price
| (recommended range 35-45%)                              Value for money
j                                                         Ability to complete work lo a high standard, short timeframe to
} Track Record/Experience                                 minimise restricted services/ciosure, can work well with Project
                                                          Manager
                                                          Methodology to be applied for delivery of proposed program
  Methodology for Contract Delivery            10%        including key milestone achievements, sufficient key personnel
                                           on             and resources for delivery of identified outcomes _    4
  Health & Safety                              5%         Minimising exposure to risk. public impact, safety of on-site |
  (5-10% unless approved)               |                 personnal associated with contract
  Environment and Sustainability        |      10%        Demonstrate environment and sustainable considerations,
  (5-10% unless approved)               |                 minimising exposure to risk associated with coniract
   gee         eee,                                       Demanstrale a meaningiul and measurable contribution to local
  Contribution to Local Econamy                              :
                                               15%        business development. local economy benefits and local   |
  (15% imene approved)                  i                | em      nt ceneration                               =
  Other: (detail)                                                                                                  |
 SS                                     | eet                                        ee             eee
  Tolal                                       100%                                                              |

                                                                                               Revised November 2013

                                                                                                    Page 34 of 44
Log in to download the original file

2015-06-01 General Committee Agenda(PDF, 1MB).pdf · 1.5 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.