Original source · versioned page text
Stormwater Management Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (11.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 1, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Stormwater Management Report Proposed Residential Development 24 Plover Street Peregian Beach For: Ingrid Hutton 14 April 2022 Ref: S22-040
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of sections 2 to 30 (of 45)
Section 2
DO C UM E NT I NFO RM ATIO N
Project Name: Proposed Residential Development
Westera Partners Ref: S22-040
Westera Partners Contact:
Jared Hill Phone: 0437 335 403
Email: [email protected]
Certified for Issue by:
Jared Hill RPEQ 19891
14 April 2022
Document Control:
Revision Author Certified for Issue Date
A J. Hill RPEQ 19891 J. Hill RPEQ 19891 14.04.2022
This report has been prepared for Ingrid Hutton for the purpose of accompanying a development
application to Noosa Council. This report must only be used by Ingrid Hutton for this purpose and must
not be used or relied upon by any other person for any other purpose.
The assessment, conclusions or recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered
and information received at the time of preparing the report and may not be relied upon as site
conditions or operations vary over time.
ii
Section 3
CO NT E NT S
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1
2 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Location and Land Use ............................................................................................................ 1
2.2 Lawful Point of Discharge ........................................................................................................ 2
2.3 Upstream Drainage Connection .............................................................................................. 2
2.4 Flooding ................................................................................................................................... 2
3 STORMWATER QUANTITY MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 2
4 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 2
4.1 Operational Phase ................................................................................................................... 2
4.2 Construction Phase ................................................................................................................. 3
4.2.1 Design Objectives .................................................................................................................... 3
4.2.2 Erosion and Sediment Control ................................................................................................. 5
4.2.3 Maintenance and Monitoring Requirements ............................................................................ 6
5 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 7
6 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... A-1
Appendix A – Erosion Hazard Assessment ........................................................................................ A-1
Appendix B – Preliminary Engineering Plans ..................................................................................... B-1
Appendix C – Site Survey & Architectural Drawings .......................................................................... C-1
List of Tables
Table 1 – Pollutants Typically Generated During the Construction Phase ............................................. 3
Table 2 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 1 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
................................................................................................................................................. 3
Table 3 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 2 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
for Temporary Drainage Works ............................................................................................... 4
Table 4 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 3 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
for Emergency Spillways on Temporary Sediment Basins ...................................................... 5
Table 5 - ESC maintenance requirements. ............................................................................................. 6
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Indicative site location (Nearmaps, 2022) ............................................................................. 1
iii
Section 4
1 INT RO D UC TIO N
Westera Partners Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Ingrid Hutton to prepare a Stormwater
Management Report to accompany a development application for a proposed residential development.
The proposal involves the construction of a new dwelling house development including access driveway
and ground level features. Driveway access will be provided via a new access crossover from Plover
Street
This report documents how stormwater runoff will be managed on site in accordance with Noosa
Council’s (NC’s) requirements.
2 SI T E D ES CR I PT IO N
2. 1 Loc at i on an d L and U se
The proposed development site is located at 24 Plover Street, Peregian Beach; also known as Lot 5 on
P9313.
The proposed development area is approximately 506m2 and is currently occupied by an existing
detached dwelling. The site currently generally falls to the east towards the coastal bushland at an
average grade of approximately 14%.
The site is bound by residential dwellings to the north and south, Plover Street to the west and coastal
bushland to the east. Refer to Figure 1 for an indicative site location and Appendix C for detailed site
survey information.
SITE
Figure 1 – Indicative site location (Nearmaps, 2022)
1
Section 5
2. 2 Law fu l P oint of D is ch ar ge
Roofwater runoff from the existing dwelling is assumed to discharge to discharge to ground level and
sheet flow off site towards the coastal bushland.
The proposed lawful point of discharge for the proposed development shall be a constructed infiltration
pit at the rear of the site. Stormwater runoff from the proposed development shall be collected on site
and directed to the pit via the construction of new on site drainage. Refer to Appendix B for further
information regarding the proposed stormwater works for the development.
2. 3 Ups tr e am D r ain ag e C onne ct ion
The development site does not have any upslope properties unable to gravity drain to a lawful point of
discharge.
2. 4 Flood ing
The proposed development site is not impacted by any NC flood mapping and is therefore considered
to be flood free.
3 STO R M WAT E R Q UA N TIT Y M AN AG E ME NT
A detailed stormwater quantity analysis of the existing and developed site conditions has not been
undertaken as the proposal is for a residential dwelling on an existing residential lot without substantial
change in site impervious fraction as a result of the development.
4 W AT ER Q U AL IT Y M A NAG E M EN T
4. 1 O pe r at io na l Ph a se
The development is not required to meet the Queensland Government’s State Planning Policy (July
2017) as the site does not exceed the 2,500m2 minimum site area. However stormwater quality
management must still be undertaken via the application of best management practices (BMPs) to
ensure no adverse impacts to the downstream environment.
Pollutants typically generated during the operational phase of the development include:
• Litter/gross pollutants;
• Sediment;
• Nutrients (N & P);
• Hydrocarbons (oils and grease); and
• Heavy metals.
Stormwater quality best management practices may be implemented for the development as follows:
• First flush diversion system for roof water diverting the roof water for irrigation purposes
• Rainwater storage tanks may be used to collect rainwater for landscape irrigation.
Best management practices have been deemed sufficient for the site area and land use. Refer to
Appendix B for the stormwater management drawing.
2
Section 6
4. 2 Con st ruc t io n Ph a se
Management of stormwater runoff during construction and the implementation of an erosion & sediment
control program is necessary to avoid impacts to receiving waters from pollutants typically generated
during the construction phase. Typical pollutants are described in Table 1 below:
Table 1 – Pollutants Typically Generated During the Construction Phase
Pollutant Sources
Litter (Gross Pollutants) Paper, construction packaging, food packaging, cement bags.
Sediment Unprotected exposed soils and stockpiles during earthworks and building.
Hydrocarbons Fuel and oil spills, leaks from construction equipment.
Toxic materials Cement slurry, asphalt prime, solvents, cleaning agents, wash waters.
pH altering substances Acid sulphate soils, cement slurry and wash waters.
In addition to the degradation of receiving waters, impacts of inadequate erosion and sediment control
downstream from the site include:
• traffic safety problems;
• blocked drains;
• local flooding problems;
• aesthetic pollution of drainage paths; and
• damage to local ecosystems.
4.2.1 De si gn O bj e ct i v es
Management of stormwater runoff during construction should be undertaken in accordance with
Appendix 2 of the SPP (July 2017). The SPP outlines the design objectives for construction phase
stormwater management. These are presented in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.
Table 2 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 1 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
Issue Desired Outcomes
Drainage Control 1. Manage stormwater flows around or through areas of exposed soil to
avoid contamination.
2. Manage sheet flows in order to avoid or minimise the generation of rill or
gully erosion.
3. Provide stable concentrated flow paths to achieve the construction
phase stormwater management design objectives for temporary
drainage works (part 2).
4. Provide emergency spillways for sediment basins to achieve the
construction phase stormwater management design objectives for
emergency spillways on temporary sediment basins (part 3).
3
Section 7
Issue Desired Outcomes
Erosion Control 1. Stage clearing and construction works to minimise the area of exposed
soil at any one time.
2. Effectively cover or stabilise exposed soils prior to predicted rainfall.
3. Prior to completion of works for the development, and prior to removal
of sediment controls, all site surfaces must be effectively stabilised
using methods which will achieve effective short-term stabilisation.
Sediment Control 1. Direct runoff from exposed site soils to sediment controls that are
appropriate to the extent of disturbance and level of erosion risk.
2. All exposed areas greater than 2500 metres must be provided with
sediment controls which are designed, implemented and maintained
to a standard which would achieve at least 80% of the average annual
runoff volume of the contributing catchment treated (i.e. 80%
hydrological effectiveness) to 50mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) or
less, and pH in the range (6.5–8.5).
Litter, Hydrocarbons and 1. Remove gross pollutants and litter.
other contaminants
2. Avoid the release of oil or visible sheen to released waters.
3. Dispose of waste containing contaminants at authorised facilities.
Waterway Stability and 1. Where measures are required to meet post-construction waterway
flood flow management stability objectives, these are either installed prior to land disturbance
and are integrated with erosion and sediment controls, or equivalent
alternative measures are implemented during construction.
2. Earthworks and the implementation of erosion and sediment controls
are undertaken in ways which ensure flooding characteristics
(including stormwater quantity characteristics) external to the
development site are not worsened during construction for all events up
to and including the 1 in 100 year ARI (1% AEP).
Table 3 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 2 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
for Temporary Drainage Works
Temporary Drainage Works Anticipated Operation Design Life and Minimum
Design Storm Event
<12 Months 12-24 Months >24 Months
Drainage Structure 1 in 2 year 1 in 5 year 1 in 10 year
ARI/39% AEP ARI/18% AEP ARI/10% AEP
4
Section 8
Temporary Drainage Works Anticipated Operation Design Life and Minimum
Design Storm Event
<12 Months 12-24 Months >24 Months
Where located immediately up-slope of an 1 in 10 year ARI/10% AEP
occupied property that would be adversely
affected by the failure or overtopping of the
structure
Culvert Crossing 1 in 1 year ARI/63% AEP
Table 4 – SPP Appendix 2: Part 3 Construction Phase – Stormwater Management Design Objectives
for Emergency Spillways on Temporary Sediment Basins
Drainage Structure Anticipated Operation Design Life and Minimum
Design Storm Event
<3 Months 3-12 Months >12 Months
Emergency spillways on temporary 1 in 10 year 1 in 20 year 1 in 50 year
sediment basins ARI/10% AEP ARI/5% AEP ARI/2% AEP
Best practice erosion and sediment controls must be installed to minimise the discharge of sediment
laden runoff during construction and to achieve the objectives outlined in Tables 2-4. This is discussed
in the following section.
4.2.2 E ro sio n and Se dim en t Co ntr ol
Management of stormwater runoff during construction is necessary to avoid pollution of downstream
waterways from sediment and gross pollutant loading. Impacts of inadequate erosion and sediment
control downstream from the site include:
• traffic safety problems;
• blocked drains;
• local flooding problems;
• aesthetic pollution of drainage paths; and
• damage to local ecosystems.
Best practice erosion and sediment controls must be installed to minimise the discharge of sediment
laden runoff during construction. Erosion and sediment control plans shall be developed during detailed
design phase and must be continually maintained and amended as required to minimise environmental
harm.
Erosion and sediment control plans are based on three sets of control measures:
• drainage control;
• erosion control; and
• sediment control.
5
Section 9
These control measures must be maintained in an effective operational condition. Sediment disposal
from site is to occur to the satisfaction of Noosa Council. Defects in erosion and sediment control
devices, such as sediment fences, are to be inspected and documented. Upon Inspection, the
Contractor is to determine whether the device should be replaced or repaired. Documentation is to
include how the damage was caused and what measures can be implemented to reduce the possibility
of repeat occurrences. Any damage to either permanent or temporary water quality control structures
or devices is to be immediately rectified at the contractor’s expense.
The effectiveness of the erosion and sediment control devices can be monitored by visual audits. All
ESC measures are to be inspected:
• at least daily (when work is occurring on site) or weekly (when work is not occurring on site);
• within 24 hours of expected rain; and
• within 18 hours of a rainfall event (i.e. an event of sufficient intensity and duration to mobilise
sediment on site).
Drainage paths are to be inspected to ensure the sediment fences are not being bypassed as a result
of soil erosion.
Sediment laden runoff shall be prevented from entering neighbouring properties. This shall be achieved
by landscaping disturbed areas immediately and prior to a rainfall event.
The proposed development has scored a 16 on the IECA erosion hazard assessment with no trigger
score values exceeded (refer Appendix A for details). Further details of proposed on site erosion and
sediment control measures will be required at the detailed design phase of the development.
4.2.3 Ma int en an ce and M o nit o ri ng Re qui r em ent s
Periodic maintenance and monitoring of stormwater devices proposed in this report is crucial to ensure
effective operation and design life.
Inspect field inlet grates, pits and underground pipes for blockage or damage at least 6 monthly or after
significant rainfall event. The filter baskets shall be inspected and maintained preferably by the
manufacturer to avoid damage to units and to ensure adequate cleaning and record keeping. For the
first 12 months routine inspections of filter baskets shall be carried out monthly with routine clean out
at alternate months. Results of the initial 12 months maintenance program shall be used to determine
future maintenance intervals. Refer manufactures maintenance and monitoring methodology for
specific details.
Maintenance of ESC measures must occur in accordance with Table 5.
Table 5 - ESC maintenance requirements.
ESC Measure Maintenance Trigger Timeframe for Completion
of Maintenance
Sediment basins When settled sediment exceeds Within 7 days of the
the volume of the sediment inspection.
storage zone
Other ESC measures The capacity of ESC measures By the end of the day.
falls below 75%.
Sediment accumulation on ESC devices is to be removed and disposed of to the satisfaction of Noosa
Council.
6
Section 10
5 CO N CLU S IO N
This SWMP outlines how stormwater runoff from the site will be managed in order to not adversely
impact the receiving environment.
The proposed lawful point of discharge for the development shall be a stormwater infiltration pit at the
rear of the property. Stormwater detention is not considered to be required as the proposal is for a
residential dwelling on an existing lot. Stormwater runoff from the development site will need to be
collected on site and directed to the infiltration pit at the build phase to ensure no adverse impacts to
neighbouring properties as a result of the development.
The development site is considered to be flood free.
Stormwater treatment should be managed through the implementation of best management practices
on site. Based on the scale of the proposed development, and typical pollutants produced, these
measures are considered adequate.
By implementing the proposed stormwater management system, and providing adequate maintenance,
the downstream environment and neighbouring properties will not experience any adverse deterioration
of water quality as a result of the proposed development.
7
Section 11
6 AP P E ND IC E S
App end ix A – E ro sio n H az ar d As s es sm en t
A-1
[OCR of page images]
Us WESTERA
PARTNERS
6 APPENDICES
Appendix A — Erosion Hazard Assessment
Section 12
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
Condition Points Score Trigger
value
AVERAGE SLOPE OF DISTURBANCE AREA [1]
• not more than 3% [3% 33H:1V] 0
• more than 3% but not more than 5% [5% = 20H:1V] 1
4 4
• more than 5% but not more than 10% [10% = 10H:1V] 2
• more than 10% but not more than 15% [15% 6.7H:1V] 4
• more than 15% 6
SOIL CLASSIFICATION GROUP (AS1726) [2]
• GW, GP, GM, GC 0
• SW, SP, OL, OH 1 3
• SM, SC, MH, CH 2
• ML, CL, or if imported fill is used, or if soils are untested 3
EMERSON (DISPERSION) CLASS NUMBER [3]
• Class 4, 6, 7, or 8 0
• Class 5 2 4 6
• Class 3, (default value if soils are untested) 4
• Class 1 or 2 6
DURATION OF SOIL DISTURBANCE [4]
• not more than 1 month 0
• more than 1 month but not more than 4 months 2 2 6
• more than 4 months but not more than 6 months 4
• more than 6 months 6
AREA OF DISTURBANCE [5]
• not more than 1000 m2 0
• more than 1000 m2 but not more than 5000 m2 1 0 4
• more than 5000 m2 but not more than 1 ha 2
• more than 1 ha but not more than 4 ha 4
• more than 4 ha 6
WATERWAY DISTURBANCE [6]
• No disturbance to a watercourse, open drain or channel 0
0 2
• Involves disturbance to a constructed open drain or channel 1
• Involves disturbance to a natural watercourse 2
REHABILITATION METHOD [7]
Percentage of area (relative to total disturbance) revegetated by seeding
without light mulching (i.e. worst-case revegetation method).
• not more than 1% 0 0
• more than 1% but not more than 5% 1
• more than 5% but not more than 10% 2
• more than 10% 4
RECEIVING WATERS [8]
• Saline waters only 0 0
• Freshwater body (e.g. creek or freshwater lake or river) 2
SUBSOIL EXPOSURE [9]
• No subsoil exposure except of service trenches 0 2
• Subsoils are likely to be exposed 2
EXTERNAL CATCHMENTS [10]
• No external catchment 0
0
• External catchment diverted around the soil disturbance 1
• External catchment not diverted around the soil disturbance 2
ROAD CONSTRUCTION [11]
• No road construction 0 0
• Involves road construction works 2
pH OF SOILS TO BE REVEGETATED [12]
• more than pH 5.5 but less than pH 8 0 1
• other pH values, or if soils are untested 1
Total Score [13] 16
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 1
Section 13
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
Explanatory notes
Requirements: Specific issues or actions required by the proponent.
Warnings: Issues that should be considered by the proponent.
Comments: General information relating to the topic.
[1] REQUIREMENTS:
For sites with an average slope of proposed land disturbance greater than 10%, a
preliminary ESCP must be submitted to the regulatory authority for approval
during planning negotiations.
Proponents must demonstrate that adequate erosion and sediment control
measures can be implemented on-site to effectively protect downstream
environmental values.
If site or financial constraints suggest that it is not reasonable or practicable for
the prescribed water quality objectives to be achieved for the proposal, then the
proponent must demonstrate that alternative designs or construction techniques
(e.g. pole homes, suspended slab) cannot reasonably be implemented on the
site.
WARNINGS:
Steep sites usually require more stringent drainage and erosion controls than
flatter grade sites.
COMMENTS:
The steeper the land, the greater the need for adequate drainage controls to
prevent soil and mulch from being washed from the site.
[2] REQUIREMENTS:
If the actual soil K-factor is known from soil testing, then the Score shall be
determined from Table 1.
If a preliminary ESCP is required during planning negotiations, then it must be
demonstrated that adequate space is available for the construction and operation
of any major sediment traps, including the provision for any sediment basins and
their associated embankments and spillways. It must also be demonstrated that
all reasonable and practicable measures can be taken to divert the maximum
quantity of sediment-laden runoff (up to the specified design storm) to these
sediment traps throughout the construction phase and until the contributing
catchment is adequately stabilised against erosion.
WARNINGS:
The higher the point score, the greater the need to protect the soil from raindrop
impact and thus the greater the need for effective erosion control measures. A
point score of 2 or greater will require a greater emphasis to be placed on
revegetation techniques that do not expose the soil to direct rainfall contact
during vegetation establishment, e.g. turfing and Hydromulching.
COMMENTS:
Table 2 provides an indication of soil conditions likely to be associated with a
particular Soil group based on a statistical analysis of soil testing across NSW.
This table provides only an initial estimate of the likely soil conditions.
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 2
Section 14
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
The left-hand-side of the table provides an indication of the type of sediment
basin that will be required (Type C, F or D). The right-hand-side of the table
provides an indication of the likely erodibility of the soil based on the Revised
Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) K-factor.
Table 3 provides some general comments on the erosion potential of the various
soil groups.
Table 1 – Score if soil K-factor is known
RUSLE soil erodibility K-factor
K < 0.02 0.02<K<0.04 0.04<K<0.06 K > 0.06
Score 0 1 2 3
Table 2 – Statistical analysis of NSW soil data [1]
Unified Likely sediment basin Probable soil erodibility K-factor (%) [2]
Soil classification (%)
Class Dry Wet Low Moderate High Very High
System
Type C Type F Type D K < 0.02 0.02<K<0.04 0.04<K<0.06 K > 0.06
GM 30 58 12 12 51 26 12
GC 42 33 25 13 71 17 0
SW 40 48 12 49 39 12 0
SP 53 32 15 76 18 5 1
SM 21 67 12 26 48 25 1
SC 26 50 24 16 64 18 2
ML 5 63 32 4 35 45 16
CL 9 51 39 12 56 19 13
OL 2 80 18 34 61 5 1
MH 12 41 48 15 19 41 25
CH 5 44 51 39 43 11 7
Notes: [1] Analysis of soil data presented in Landcom (2004).
[2] Soil erodibility based on Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) K-factor.
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
GW Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines
GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel-sand mixture, little or no fines
GM Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures
GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-clay mixtures
SW Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines
SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines
SM Silty sands, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures
SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures
ML Inorganic silts & very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands with slight plasticity
CL Inorganic clays, low–medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays
OL Organic silts and organic silt-clays of low plasticity
MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts
CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays
OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 3
Section 15
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
Table 3 – Typical properties of various soil groups [1]
Soil Groups Typical properties [2]
GW, GP • Low erodibility potential.
GM, GC • Low to medium erodibility potential.
• May create turbid runoff if disturbed as a result of the release of silt
and clay particles.
SW, SP • Low to medium erodibility potential.
SM, SC • Medium erodibility potential.
• May create turbid runoff if disturbed as a result of the release of silt
and clay particles.
MH, CH • Highly variable (low to high) erodibility potential.
• Will generally create turbid runoff if disturbed.
ML, CL • High erodibility potential.
• Tendency to be dispersive.
• May create some turbidity in runoff if disturbed.
Note: [1] After Soil Services & NSW DLWC (1998).
[2] Any soil can represent a high erosion risk if the binding clays or silts are unstable.
Table 4 provides general guidelines on the suitability of various soil groups to various
engineering applications.
Table 4 – Engineering suitability based on Unified Soil Classification [1]
Embankments
USC Fill Slope Untreated
Unified Soil Class Water Non
Group stability roads
retaining water
retaining
Well graded gravels GW Unsuitable Excellent Excellent Excellent Average
Poorly graded gravel GP Unsuitable Average Excellent Average Unsuitable
Silty gravels GM Unsuitable Average Good Average Average
Clayey gravels GC Suitable Average Good Average Excellent
Well graded sands SW Unsuitable Excellent Excellent Excellent Average
Poorly graded sands SP Unsuitable Average Good Average Unsuitable
Silty sands SM Suitable [2] Average Average Average Poor
Clayey sands SC Suitable Average Average Average Good
Inorganic silts ML Unsuitable Poor Average Poor Unsuitable
Inorganic clays CL Suitable [2] Good Average Good Poor
Organic silts OL Unsuitable Unsuitable Poor Unsuitable Unsuitable
Inorganic silts MH Unsuitable Poor Poor Poor Unsuitable
Inorganic clays CH Suitable [2] Average Unsuitable Average Unsuitable
Organic clays OH Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable
Highly organic soils Pt Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable Unsuitable
Notes: [1] Modified from Hazelton & Murphy (1992)
[2] Suitable only after modifications to soil such as compaction and/or erosion protection
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 4
Section 16
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
[3] If the soils have not been tested for Emerson Class, then adopt a score of 4.
REQUIREMENTS:
Works proposed on sites containing Emerson Class 1 or 2 soils have a very high
pollution potential and must submit a conceptual ESCP to the regulatory authority
for review and/or approval (as required by the authority) during planning
negotiations.
WARNINGS:
Class 3 and 5 soils disturbed by cut and fill operations or construction traffic are
highly likely to discolour stormwater (i.e. cause turbid runoff). Chemical
stabilisation will likely be required if these soils are placed immediately adjacent
to a retaining wall. Any disturbed Class 1, 2, 3 and 5 soils that are to be
revegetated must be covered with a non-dispersive topsoil as soon as possible
(unless otherwise agreed by the regulatory authority).
Class 1 and 2 soils are highly likely to discolour (pollute) stormwater if exposed to
rainfall or flowing water. Treatment of these soils with gypsum (or other suitable
substance) will most likely be required. These soils should not be placed directly
behind a retaining wall unless it has been adequately treated (stabilised) or
covered with a non-dispersible soil.
[4] The duration of disturbance refers to the total duration of soil exposure to rainfall
up until a time when there is at least 70% coverage of all areas of soil.
REQUIREMENTS:
All land developments with an expected soil disturbance period greater than 6
months must submit a conceptual ESCP to the regulatory authority for review
and/or approval (as required by the authority) during planning negotiations.
COMMENTS:
Construction periods greater than 3 months will generally experience at least
some significant storm events, independent of the time of year that the
construction (soil disturbance) occurs.
[5] REQUIREMENTS:
Development proposals with an expected soil disturbance in excess of 1ha must
submit a conceptual ESCP to the regulatory authority for review and/or approval
(as required by the regulatory authority) during planning negotiations.
The area of disturbance refers to the total area of soil exposed to rainfall or dust-
producing winds either as a result of:
(a) the removal of ground cover vegetation, mulch or sealed surfaces;
(b) past land management practices;
(c) natural conditions.
WARNINGS:
A Sediment Basin will usually be required if the disturbed area exceeds 0.25ha
(2500m2) within any sub-catchment (i.e. land flowing to one outlet point).
COMMENTS:
For soil disturbances greater than 0.25ha, the revegetation phase should be
staged to minimise the duration for which soils are exposed to wind, rain and
concentrated runoff.
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 5
Section 17
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
[6] REQUIREMENTS:
All developments that involve earthworks or construction within a natural
watercourse (whether that watercourse is in a natural or modified condition) must
submit a conceptual ESCP to the regulatory authority for review and/or approval
(as required by the regulatory authority) during planning negotiations.
Permits and/or licences may be required from the State Government, including
possible submission of the ESCP to the relevant Government department.
[7] REQUIREMENTS:
No areas of soil disturbance shall be left exposed to rainfall or dust-producing
winds at the end of a development without an adequate degree of protection
and/or an appropriate action plan for the establishment of at least 70% cover.
COMMENTS:
Grass seeding without the application of a light mulch cover is considered the
least favourable revegetation technique. A light mulch cover is required to
protect the soil from raindrop impact, excessive temperature fluctuations, and the
loss of essential soil moisture.
[8] COMMENTS:
All receiving waters can be adversely affected by unnatural quantities of
sediment-laden runoff. Freshwater ecosystems are generally more susceptible to
ecological harm resulting from the inflow of fine or dispersible clays than saline
water bodies. The further inland a land disturbance is, the greater the potential
for the released sediment to cause environmental harm as this sediment travels
towards the coast.
For the purpose of this clause it is assumed that all sediment-laden runoff will
eventually flow into saline waters. Thus, sediment-laden discharges that flow first
into freshwater are likely to adversely affect both fresh and saline water bodies
and are therefore considered potentially more damaging to the environment.
This clause does not imply that sediment-laden runoff will not cause harm to
saline waters.
[9] COMMENTS:
This clause refers to subsoils exposed during the construction phase either as a
result of past land practices or proposed construction activities. The exposure of
subsoils resulting from the excavation of minor service trenches should not be
considered.
[10] WARNINGS:
The greater the extent of external catchment, the greater the need to divert up-
slope stormwater runoff around any soil disturbance.
COMMENTS:
The ability to separate “clean” (i.e. external catchment) stormwater runoff from
“dirty” site runoff can have a significant effect on the size, efficiency and cost of
the temporary drainage, erosion, and sediment control measures.
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 6
Section 18
Best Practice Erosion And Sediment Control Erosion Hazard Assessment Form
[11] REQUIREMENTS:
Permission must be obtained from the owner of a road reserve before placing
any erosion and sediment control measures within the road reserve.
WARNINGS:
Few sediment control techniques work efficiently when placed on a road and/or
around roadside stormwater inlets. Great care must be taken if sediment control
measures are located on a public roadway, specifically:
• safety issues relating to road users;
• the risk of causing flooding on the road or within private property.
The construction of roads (whether temporary or permanent) will usually modify
the flow path of stormwater runoff. This can affect how “dirty” site runoff is
directed to the sediment control measures.
COMMENTS:
“On-road” sediment control devices are at best viewed as secondary or
supplementary sediment control measures. Only in special cases and/or on very
small projects (e.g. kerb and channel replacement) might these controls be
considered as the “primary” sediment control measure.
[12] WARNINGS:
Soils with a pH less than 5.5 or greater than 8 will usually require treatment in
order to achieve satisfactory revegetation. Soils with a pH of less than 5
(whether naturally acidic or in acid sulfate soil areas) may also limit the choice of
chemical flocculants (e.g. Alum) for use in the flocculation of Sediment Basins.
[13] REQUIREMENTS:
A preliminary ESCP must be submitted to the local government for approval
during the planning phase for any development that obtains a total point score of
17 or greater or when any trigger value is scored or exceeded.
IECA (Australasia) November 2008 Page 7
Section 19
App end ix B – P re li mi na ry Eng in ee r ing Pl a n s
B-1
[OCR of page images]
Us WESTERA
PARTNERS
Appendix B - Preliminary Engineering Plans
B-1
Section 20
PLOVER STREET
LEGEND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION
DOCUMENT CONTROL APPROVED SUNSHINE COAST GOLD COAST SURVEYOR DRAWING STATUS
Suite 2, Norval Corporate Centre, Level 3
PROJECT
DESIGNED 13 Norval Ct, Maroochydore 17 Welch St, Southport
T 07 5391 3777 F 07 5646 5857 T 07 5571 1599 F 07 5571 1330
DRAWN E [email protected] E [email protected] LOCATION DRAWING NUMBER
CHECKED PARTNERS BRISBANE NORTHERN NSW USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY. DO NOT SCALE, IF A DISCREPANCY ARISES CHECK WITH THE
DATE For and on behalf of Level 2 Limestore,
PROJECT ENGINEER AND/OR SUPERVISING AUTHORITY. DO NOT WORK FROM REDUCED SCALE
Suite 24, DRAWINGS (A1-A3 SIZE PAPER). COPYRIGHT OF ALL DRAWINGS & WORKS EXECUTED FROM TITLE SHEET NUMBER REVISION
WESTERA PARTNERS PTY. LTD. 33 Longland St, Newstead 11-13 Pearl Street, Kingscliff THEM IS VESTED IN WESTERA PARTNERS AND USE OF THERE FORE WITHOUT PERMISSION IS
T 07 3852 4333 F 07 3852 4777 T 02 6674 8047 F 02 6674 8049 STRICTLY PROHIBITED! IT IS THE BUILDERS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE ALL WORKS ARE
No. DATE REVISIONS FILE NAME www.westerapartners.com.au ABN 52 097 417 975 E [email protected] E [email protected] CARRIED OUT WITH DUE CARE AND DILIGENCE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CLIENT
Section 21
App end ix C – Si t e Su rv e y & A rc hit ec tu ra l Dr aw ing s
C-1
[OCR of page images]
Us WESTERA
PARTNERS
Appendix C — Site Survey & Architectural Drawings
Section 22
{/ SURVEY LOCATION
The red dashed lines on this Plan represent an
approximation of the boundary positions for this site and
may not be located in its true position in relation to the
Levels and Features shown here on. Additional Survey
SEE _ work is required to position the boundary and the
Features in their correct relation to each other. Please
NOTE contact Axis Surveys for additional advice before relying
L on the boundary position on this Plan for design purposes
( SETOUT EXTRA FEES ALERT (Designer/Builder Etc.)
This Contour and Feature Survey as prepared by Axis Surveys does not
address the location of boundaries, Because of the age of the subject plan /
and / or missing boundary pegs, Axis Surveys will require additional fees for
extra control work to enable us to setout any proposed building work. Please
[ contact this office for further advice
\ Sewerage Note
Sewer manhole/s not located
NOTE must be found on site
prior to construction
Tree Legend
@=Trunk Dia
(Total Canopy)
—T Te
TREE SCHEDULE
No. | Name | T'O' | Spr'@' | 'H
1 TREE 0.30 m 3.0m 5.0m
2 TREE 0.20 m 2.0m 4.0m
3 TREE 0.30 m 4.0m 5.0m
4 TREE 0.30 m 5.0m 5.0m
5 TREE 0.30m 5.0m 5.0m
6
7
8
9
TREE 0.50m 7.0m 6.0m
TREE 0.40m 6.0m 7.0m
TREE 0.20m 3.0m 5.0m
TREE 030m 3.0m 7.0m
10 TREE 0.20m 2.0m 4.0m
it TREE | 030m] 5.0m | 6.0m
12 TREE | 040m | 3.0m | 5.0m
13 TREE | 040m | 3.0m | 5.0m
HO
q
“———— Mas
Approximate House
Connection Plotted —
From Statutory or
Supplied Records
Approx. Invert Level 7.08m
Approx. .84m deep
Saoe LL
H
House
AHO
Patio
IE
Existing
ighset
Sewer M/H
Not Located
Peg
Found
Wall
Block Ret.
Existing Concrete |
Timber Fence 9.25. 8.88
8.18
90°0'
I
Ws
Timber Fence
32
BUSH LAND
Metal Fence on Existing Timber Sleeper Retaining Wall
7.53 7.38 Gat 182°13'20"
‘cee nee sate 7.51
7. 3 TT
Sewer Mit” 75,088 ‘
Not Located
[et
Deck
Floor Level =
No Mk
Found
2
Step
1926 13.
3.42 Existing Coneretes
3. E\
f
19g]
TBM Spike in Bitumen
AHD RL / m 13.461
' Plover Street
1326) Block Ret, Wall
11 Y PProximate Ss
ewer Line Lo
Approximate House
Connection Plotted
From Statutory or
Supplied Records
Cation (See note)
| Approx. Invert Level 7.32m
Approx. .65m deep
jo7e RL 10.70 :10-78
Dg ° 73
oT e = eS §
aftr es TTS
Deck _ Floor Level
RL 14.34
Floor Level
RL 11.73
Roof Peak Existing Q Gutterline
“pAIRE 19.05 Highset Roof Peak
s House RL 19.05
1.00_
ws
we . Floor Level e
S &
Gao a RL 2.97 Existing
12.70 a Highset
= House
Hi1ga"" 11.9%
wre 12.58 12.58
Existing Concrete L__
Block Ret.Wal
8
8
=
5
i"
5
2
E
=
Approximate Sewer Line Location (See note)
Contour & Feature Survey «
ra sci S
SURVEYS
Unit 5/23 Overlord Place, ACACIA RIDGE, Qld, 4110
Ph (07) 3363 8100 www.axissurveys.com.au
LOT 5 on — P9313
#24 Plover Street
Suburb Peregian Beach
Local Auth Sunshine Coast Reg.Council
Area 506m2
Client:
Reitsma & Associates
Order No:
NOTES TO BE READ BEFORE USING THIS PLAN
This Plan has limitations regarding its use for
some applications. Please contact this office if
there is any doubt about the suitability of this
plan for the intended use. These notes form part of
this plan and they must remain with the plan or
any copies. The limitations of this plan are detailed
in the link below, with the main ones being:-
1, This plan has been prepared for our client &
should not be used by others without approval.
2, The boundaries shown have been sourced
from the subject survey plan or as noted, and
have not been checked.
3, Distances from features to the shown
boundaries should not be used or relied upon.
4, If positional accuracy is critical a boundary
identification survey may be required.
5, The certificate of title has not been searched
and should be checked for any encumbrances.
6. The contours may not represent the local
authority's definition of “Ground Level”
7. A flood search has not been carried out.
Check with local council for min. and max.
construction heights.
8. Non visible services (if shown), have been
plotted from the relevant authority's records
or from other sources and may not be
accurate. Services should be exposed
before design or construction commences.
9, The north point has been taken from the survey
plan and may not be suitable for all uses.
Refer to this link for more information
www. axissurveys.com.au/alertsanddisclaimers/
Issue Date Amendment By
A 23/03/21 _| Original Issue GEO1
B
C
D
E
FE
Ty po
Site No: 2101583 Scale:
Order No: X427758 .
Level Datum: AHD 1:200
Surveyed: SH/CF PAGE
Date: 18/03/21} 1 OF 1
Section 23
DRAWING SET INDEX
100 SITE PLANS
WD.101 COVER SHEET
WD.102 SITE SURVEY PLAN
WD.103 NATURAL SURFACE CONTOURS
WD.104 GFA AND SITE COVER
150 COUNCIL PLANNING
WD.151 PLANNING ENVELOPE
WD.152 STREET VIEW STUDY
WD.153 SOUTH ELEVATION STUDY
200 FLOOR PLANS
WD.201 LOWER LEVEL PLAN
WD.202 MAIN LEVEL PLAN
WD.203 UPPER LEVEL PLAN
WD.204 ROOF PLAN
500 ELEVATIONS
WD.501 NORTH & WEST ELEVATIONS
WD.502 SOUTH & EAST ELEVATIONS
600 SECTIONS
WD.601 SECTIONS A & C
WD.602 SECTION B & D
WD.603 SECTION E
PT
EW A
VI AD
DA3 Development Approval
issue issue / amendment
RE OR
21.03.22 LF AB JH
PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE issue date drawn by
PF
client
Ingrid & Nick Hutton
24 PLOVER STREET
project
M
Hutton Plover St
TE
location
24 Plover St Peregian Beach
PEREGIAN BEACH COVER SHEET
Aboda Lee Foster • director Scott Falconer • director
Design p - 0424 620 247 p - 0431 267 157
Group e - [email protected] e - [email protected]
the aboda design group trust Level 2 1794 David Low Way Coolum Beach,
ABN 56 266 884 746 Q. 4573. PO box 2449 Noosa Heads Q 4567
t/a aboda design group • BSA License -150580097 • www.aboda.com.au
• This drawing is to be read in conjunction with engineers drawings & reports • Construction
to comply with all relevant SAA & NCC Codes & standard Bldg By-law 1975 & as amended •
Copyright for design & drawings remain the property of the authors • Verify all dimensions on
site prior to commencement of any works • These drawings are not to be used for scaling.
scale as shown @ A3 issue
drawing no.
WD.101 DA3
Section 24
{/ SURVEY LOCATION Contour & Feature Survey |
The red dashed lines on this Plan represent an
approximation of the boundary positions for this site and
may not be located in its true position in relation to the
Levels and Features shown here on. Additional Survey logs
SEE _ work is required to position the boundary and the NY
Features in their correct relation to each other. Please )| BUSHLAND ).
NOTE contact Axis Surveys for additional advice before relying
L on the boundary position on this Plan for design purposes.
(- SETOUT EXTRA FEES ALERT (Designer/Builder Etc.) 9 Found.753 136 Gat eet Retaining Wall No mx
36 Gate 75
This Contour and Feature Survey as prepared by Axis Surveys does not 790 Oo eo Nae —~eFound Ss U RV EW Ss
address the location of boundaries. Because of the age of the subject plan / wWiGhs ver Mit? 15.088 “Hex mal
and / or missing boundary pegs, Axis Surveys will require additional fees for ——— mass Not Located % ra ~ Unit 5/23 Overlord Place, ACACIA RIDGE, Qld, 4110
extra control work to enable us to setout any proposed building work. Please Approximate House S Ph (07) 3363 8100 www.axissurveys.com.au
contact this office for further advice. Connection Plotted — . ys.com,
i. From Statutory or 1.0
Supplied Records Lax
Sewerage Note Approx. Invert Level 7.08m @ Ba : LOT 5 on P9313
Sewer manhole/s not located Approx. 84m deep 5 4 ~ y7 Pproxi
NOTE must be found on site Be g et | Mate Sewer {in #24 Plover Street
prior to construction ox. 5 Approximate House e Location (Se .
geal Approximate House © note) Suburb Peregian Beach
este 86 Sippiod Recde ;
3 : ppl
2 ee, poten” rvert revel 732m Local Auth Sunshine Coast Reg.Council
oO ¢ rox. .65m dee}
5 x P , Area = 506m?
i
F| Client:
g Floor Level
Patio io jo.78__ RL 1073
—
Deck _ Floor Level
RL 14.34
Floor Level
RL 11.73
Reitsma & Associates
90°0'
Order No:
NOTES TO BE READ BEFORE USING THIS PLAN
This Plan has limitations regarding its use for
some applications. Please contact this office if
there is any doubt about the suitability of this
plan for the intended use. These notes form part of
this plan and they must remain with the plan or
any copies. The limitations of this plan are detailed
Existing in the link below, with the main ones being:-
Highset 1, This plan has been prepared for our client &
House should not be used by others without approval.
2, The boundaries shown have been sourced
from the subject survey plan or as noted, and
T koe __. have not been checked.
It
Existing
Highset
House
Roof Peak Exis ing
IRL 19.05 Highset
S" House
\ Gutterline
Timber Fence
eS 2 Floor Level
— so)
a RL R97 w
11.98"" 11.95 J
14278 12.58
Existing Concrete
Block Ret.Wa
NB 3, Distances from features to the shown
Tree Legend = boundaries should not be used or relied upon.
8 \ 4, If positional accuracy is critical a boundary
2 \ identification survey may be required.
D 5, The certificate of title has not been searched
2 | and should be checked for any encumbrances.
rr @=Trunk Dia - \) 6, The contours may not represent the local
ree Height i authority's definition of “Ground Level”
SeTree cf 7. A flood search has not been carried out.
prea Check with local council for min. and max.
(Total Canopy) a | we St construction heights.
< gs
—T7* 6 2 ol 8. Non visible services (if shown), have been
Gate 0: plotted from the relevant authority's records
TREE SCHEDULE 5 > 2 pal or from other sources and may not be
— To BHO 3HO ———_ g Bx accurate. Services should be exposed
No. | Name | T'@' | Spr '@ H! ‘a + 2 3 before design or construction commences.
1 TREE | 030m | 3.0m | 5.0m Power Pole 5 9, The north point has been taken from the survey
2 | Tree | 020m | 20m | 40m Sewer M/H 2 plan and may not be suitable for all uses.
3 | Tree | 030m] 4.0m | 50m Not Located 5 SEW + A : . . Refer to this link for more information
5 Pproximate Sewer Line Location (See note) www.axissurveys.com.au/alertsanddisclaimers/
4 TREE | 030m | 5.0m | 5.0m 5
Issue Date Amendment By
: met oe m 50 m so m 8 TBM Spike in Bitumen A 23/03/21 _| Original Tssue GEOL
50m Om Om =
AHD RL/ m 13.461
7 TREE | 040m | 6.0m | 7.0m | a4 / _ £
8 | tree | 020m[ 30m | 50m — 3 E
FE
9 TREE 030m | 3.0m | 7.0m Plover Street oy Ts
10 | TREE | 0.20m | 20m | 4.0m Site No: 2101583 Scale:
11 | TREE | 030m | 5.0m | 6.0m Order No: x427758| 12200
12 | TREE | 040m | 3.0m | 5.0m seve! Datum: sic PAGE
13, | TREE | 040m | 3.0m | 5.0m Date: me 18/03/21| 1_ OF 1
Section 25
Notes
‘These notes are an integral part of this plan/data.
Reproduction of this plan or any
these nates being included in ful
information shown on such reproduction invalid and
not suitable for use.
Disclaimers
This plan has been prepared by Axis Surveys for our
client for the purposes of designing structures above
or below the Local Authorities definition of a surface
relevant to their current requirements.
This plan should only be used for the purpose for
which it was prepared and is for the sole purpose and
use of our client. Axis Surveys therefore will not be
liable for any claims or damages whatsoever resulting
oF arising from the use of, or reliance on, by a third
Party of information taken fram this plan.
‘The electronic copy of this data is the property of Axis
Surveys and is not to be altered, transferred or
reproduced by any means.
Approved hardcopy of this plan takes precedence
over this electronic copy,
itis the property owner's respon: to determine
to encumbrances) will prevent or limit development
prior to commencement of any works on site.
Reference Material
‘This plan is to be read in conjunction with the Axis
Surveys Client Agreement and Conditions of
Engagement for Surveying Services, and/ar Axis
‘Surveys Work Authority Form and/or Building Plans.
provided to Axis Surveys for this purpose.
Plan Expiration
This plan expires at the date that information on
which this plan relies has been modified in any
material way. Please seek clarification from Axis
Surveys if in doubt as to the currency of this plan.
Copyright
Copyright © 2008-2013 Axis Surveys.
All rights reserved, This drawing may not be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means in whole or in part, without the prior written
permission of Axis Surveys,
NORTH POINT WARNING
The north point shown relates ta the subject survey plan.
‘The user should ensure this is suitable for their purpose ,
( enpvev tarazInna?
SURVEY LOCATION
This ground tevel plan, as prepared by Axis Surveys,
does not guarantee the surveyed position of features
in relation to the boundaries, as no boundary marks
were iocated or sited
ee
90°0"
The level of the surface of the land adopted
for this "Ground / Prescribed Level" plan is based on:
Works Detail Plan-No.
e) The Axis Surveys Contour & Feature Survey
(Job: 2101583 X427758 Issue A dated 23/03/21)
182°13'20"
A
~ ASOBB
ee ——~—— _9.0
bp
%&
8 ee
3 eet
eo
a Leo
aa
_o-
a a
aa “7
La--7 a a
Le
ae “
ae “7
van ° “7
a
wo a
a
a“
a
a“
a
2
-— Oo a
ao
Le 3.088
TBM Spike in Bitumen
RL 13.461m AHD D
Plover Street
GROUND/PRESCRIBED LEVEL PLAN ©
4
La sci s
SURVEYS
Unit 5/23 Overlord Place, ACACIA RIDGE, Qld, 4110
Ph (07) 3363 8100 www.axissurveys.com.au
LOT 5° on P9313
#24 Plover Street
Suburb Peregian Beach
Local Auth Sunshine Coast Reg. Council
Reistma & Associates
Builder's Client:
Issue Date Amendment By
A 9/4/21 _| Original Issue RR
Job No. 2101583
Order No. X427758
Client Order No.
Height Datum | AHD
Height Origin | GNSS
270°0"
33,561
pot Tat
PAGE
Miu) 1 4 47" 2 OF 2
Scale 1:200 - Lengths in Metres SCALE 1:200 at A3
Section 26
SITE PLAN
+ IL 6.870 SCALE 1:200 @ A3
13.00
10.0
12.00
10.2
11.50
11.00
10.75
11.75
12
12.25
10.50
11.25
12.
9.75
9.50
90°0'
.75
50
0
5
33.561
1.5m SIDE SETBACK
SITE COVER THIS LEVEL 217.72 m2 2m SIDE SETBACK
GFA THIS LEVEL 160.88 m2
PLOVER STREET
2°13'20"
15.088
8.
00
182°13'20"
15.088
6m FRONT SETBACK
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOWER LEVEL GFA Lot 5 on P9313
SCALE 1:200 @ A3 12
.75 EXISTING POOL
12
.75
2m SIDE SETBACK
1.5m SIDE SETBACK
33.561
9.5
9.2
11.25
10.75
10.50
9.7
11.50
11.75
8.25
9.0
8.75
8.50
10.25
11.
270°0'
0
5
5
0
0 0
Landscaping Area158.87 m2
GFA PER LEVEL SITE COVER SITE COVER as a % of SITE
GFA THIS LEVEL 177.27 m2
SITE AREA 506 m2
LOWER LEVEL SITE COVER ALL LEVELS
289.97 SITE COVER LOWER 217.72 m2 43%
160.88
SITE COVER MAIN 216.96m2 42.9%
MAIN LEVEL SITE COVER LOWER SITE COVER UPPER 67m2 13%
217.72 SITE COVER TOTAL 290m2 57%
177.27
UPPER LEVEL SITE COVER MAIN LANDSCAPING TOTAL 158.9m2 31%
49.77 216.96 WINTER
SITE COVER THIS LEVEL 216.96 m2 SUN PATH
SITE COVER UPPER
)
Sett am
67.00 in g5 in g (7
MAIN LEVEL GFA
pm Ris
MER
SUM PATH N
SCALE 1:200 @ A3 SUN
p m Ris
in
.30 g (6
in g5 .30
Sett am
)
CUT AND FILL
PT
main site cut
149m2
EW A
MAIN CUT 149 m2
VI AD
DA3 Development Approval
FILL: issue issue / amendment
2
UNDER SLAB FILL: 33 m
RE OR
21.03.22 LF AB JH
BACK YARD FILL: 37 m2 issue date drawn by
FRONT PLANTER FILL: 8 m2
PF
client
Ingrid & Nick Hutton
BALANCE OF CUT & FILL: 71 m2 to remove from site project
M
Hutton Plover St
TE
location
2 24 Plover St Peregian Beach
GFA THIS LEVEL 49.77 m
GFA AND SITE COVER
Aboda Lee Foster • director Scott Falconer • director
Design p - 0424 620 247 p - 0431 267 157
back yard fill Group e - [email protected]
the aboda design group trust
ABN 56 266 884 746
e - [email protected]
Level 2 1794 David Low Way Coolum Beach,
Q. 4573. PO box 2449 Noosa Heads Q 4567
37m2 t/a aboda design group • BSA License -150580097 • www.aboda.com.au
• This drawing is to be read in conjunction with engineers drawings & reports • Construction
SITE COVER THIS LEVEL 67.00 m 2 front planter fill to comply with all relevant SAA & NCC Codes & standard Bldg By-law 1975 & as amended •
Copyright for design & drawings remain the property of the authors • Verify all dimensions on
site prior to commencement of any works • These drawings are not to be used for scaling.
underslab fill 8m2 scale as shown @ A3 issue
UPPER LEVEL GFA
drawing no.
33m2
SCALE 1:200 @ A3 WD.104 DA3
Section 27
+8.0M
8M HEIGHT LIM
+7.5M IT
9
+4.5M
8M HE
IGHT L
IMIT
RELAXATIONS
1 1. WALL & EAVE THROUGH 2M SIDE SETBACK
1 2. PLANTER THROUGH 2M SIDE SETBACK
3. WALL & ROOF THROUGH 1.5M SIDE SETBACK QDC COMPLIANT
GARAGE 3 4. EAVE THROUGH 2.5M SIDE SETBACK
QDC compliant 5. PLANTER THROUGH 2M SIDE SETBACK
6. WALL THROUGH 1.5M SIDE SETBACK
2
7. POOL DECK THROUGH 6M REAR SETBACK
8. TRANSPERENT BALUSTRADE >2M ON BOUNDARY
9. EAVE THROUGH 2M SIDE SETBACK
SOUTH EAST
2M
AB
OV
EN
AT
7
UR 8M HE
AL IGHT L
1M IMIT
AB
OV
EN
4 +8.0M
AT +7.5M
UR
AL
L IM IT
HT
EIG
8 MH
8 +4.5M
5
GARAGE 2M ABOVE NATURAL
6
SOUTH WEST EIG
HT
L IM I
T 8M
HEI
GHT
LI M IT
2M ABOVE NATURA
L
FENCE A
M H
8
1M ABOVE NATURAL
+8.0M
+7.5M
9
PT
8M
HE
EW A
IG H
TL
VI AD
IM I
T
1 1 DA3 Development Approval
issue issue / amendment
+4.5M
RE OR
21.03.22 LF AB JH
2 NORTH WEST issue date drawn by
PF
client
2M ABOVE NA 6 5 Ingrid & Nick Hutton
TURAL project
M
Hutton Plover St
3
TE
location
GARAGE 2M AB
OVE N
24 Plover St Peregian Beach
QDC compliant ATURA
L PLANNING ENVELOPE
8 Aboda Lee Foster • director Scott Falconer • director
Design p - 0424 620 247 p - 0431 267 157
1M ABOVE NA Group e - [email protected] e - [email protected]
TURAL the aboda design group trust Level 2 1794 David Low Way Coolum Beach,
ABN 56 266 884 746 Q. 4573. PO box 2449 Noosa Heads Q 4567
t/a aboda design group • BSA License -150580097 • www.aboda.com.au
• This drawing is to be read in conjunction with engineers drawings & reports • Construction
to comply with all relevant SAA & NCC Codes & standard Bldg By-law 1975 & as amended •
Copyright for design & drawings remain the property of the authors • Verify all dimensions on
site prior to commencement of any works • These drawings are not to be used for scaling.
setback means the minimum distance from
scale as shown @ A3 issue
any lot boundary to a building or structure,
drawing no.
excluding eaves, roof overhangs and
awnings provided they encroach no more
than 600mm into the setback distance. WD.151 DA3
Section 28
T LIMIT T LIMIT
EIGH EIGH
8M H 8M H
screened undercroft screened undercroft
3 CONSECUTIVE STORIES 2 CONSECUTIVE STORIES
NORTH-WEST STREET PERSPECTIVE NORTH-WEST STREET PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE
8M HE 8M HE
IGHT L IGHT L
IMIT IMIT
QDC compliant garage QDC compliant garage
3 CONSECUTIVE STORIES 2 CONSECUTIVE STORIES
SOUTH-WEST STREET PERSPECTIVE SOUTH-WEST STREET PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE
8M HEIGHT LIMIT
PT
EW A
VI AD
DA3 Development Approval
issue issue / amendment
RE OR
21.03.22 LF AB JH
2 CONSECUTIVE STORIES/ issue date drawn by
PF
client
3 CONSECUTIVE STORIES
Ingrid & Nick Hutton
project
M
Hutton Plover St
TE
location
24 Plover St Peregian Beach
STREET VIEW STUDY
Aboda Lee Foster • director Scott Falconer • director
Design p - 0424 620 247 p - 0431 267 157
Group e - [email protected] e - [email protected]
the aboda design group trust Level 2 1794 David Low Way Coolum Beach,
ABN 56 266 884 746 Q. 4573. PO box 2449 Noosa Heads Q 4567
t/a aboda design group • BSA License -150580097 • www.aboda.com.au
• This drawing is to be read in conjunction with engineers drawings & reports • Construction
to comply with all relevant SAA & NCC Codes & standard Bldg By-law 1975 & as amended •
Copyright for design & drawings remain the property of the authors • Verify all dimensions on
site prior to commencement of any works • These drawings are not to be used for scaling.
scale as shown @ A3 issue
drawing no.
WEST STREET PERSPECTIVE WD.152 DA3
*THIS ELEVATION DOES NOT CHANGE, REGARDLESS OF 2 OR 3 STORIES.
Section 29
8M HEIG
HT LIM
IT
QDC compliant garage
3 CONSECUTIVE STORIES
SOUTH ELEVATION
PERSPECTIVE
8M HE
IGHT L
IMIT
PT
EW A
VI AD
DA3 Development Approval
issue issue / amendment
RE OR
21.03.22 LF AB JH
issue date drawn by
PF
client
Ingrid & Nick Hutton
project
M
Hutton Plover St
TE
location
24 Plover St Peregian Beach
QDC compliant garage
SOUTH ELEVATION STUDY
screened undercroft
Aboda Lee Foster • director Scott Falconer • director
Design p - 0424 620 247 p - 0431 267 157
Group e - [email protected] e - [email protected]
the aboda design group trust Level 2 1794 David Low Way Coolum Beach,
ABN 56 266 884 746 Q. 4573. PO box 2449 Noosa Heads Q 4567
t/a aboda design group • BSA License -150580097 • www.aboda.com.au
• This drawing is to be read in conjunction with engineers drawings & reports • Construction
2 CONSECUTIVE STORIES
to comply with all relevant SAA & NCC Codes & standard Bldg By-law 1975 & as amended •
Copyright for design & drawings remain the property of the authors • Verify all dimensions on
site prior to commencement of any works • These drawings are not to be used for scaling.
scale as shown @ A3 issue
drawing no.
SOUTH ELEVATION DA3
PERSPECTIVE WD.153
Section 30
D C
A B WD.602 C D WD.601 E F G
N 3° 35' 25" E
9
2,300 5,910 2,800 8,590 3,700 4,480
6
1
.
0
1
13.00
12
12.00
10.0
11.50
11.00
10.2
10.75
12.25
11.75
11.25
10.50
12.
9.75
.75
9.50
50
0
90°0'
5
33.561
N
8
9
3
°
3
3
.
5
4
6
'
1
5
7
"
E
1,776 OMP (wall)
600
600
screen
1,076
pavers FFL 9.870 6 5 4 3 2 1 planting
line of building over
pavers
pavers 1.5m SIDE SETBACK
DPx2 landing steps
1 1
N
N
N
8
8
8
9
9
9
2
2
2
°
°
°
1
1
1
3
3
3
.
.
.
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
'
'
'
6
6
6
5
5
5
7
7
7
"
"
"
E
E
E
window louvres DP louvres
1 screen
gates
N
8
9
2
°
1
3
.
5
4
5
'
7
5
7
"
E
rh rh rh 2m SIDE SETBACK planting
2
zwift
SHR RM
picture window
station 3
rear boundary wall
manhole
FFL 10.770 FT
ZACS
2,890
2,890
murphy bed FFL 10.770 robe
FRONT UNDER CROFT ROOM + IL 6.870
tv <1m
FFL 10.770
COURTYARD RWC tank CRAFT/
(2x 10,000L)
OVER SPARE ROOM wc
C
FFL 10.770 LEVEL TURF
2 <1m
2
2°13'20"
C
PDR
15.088
louvre pool fence
door dock
8.
E POOLSIDE 00 E
WD.603 b. TD DECK <1m WD.603
desk
<1m
2,970
2,970
h.w.
partition slider
artwork 2 1
6m FRONT SETBACK
pool fence
desk
E
E
E
E
ARRIVAL POOLSIDE
W
W
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 FFL 10.410
POOL LIVING/
"
"
"
"
"
"
7
7
7
7
OVER STAIR DECK
7
7
6m REAR SETBACK
8
5
5
5
5
8
2 1
MPR
182°13'20"
1
1
1
1
sliding door
3 3
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
'
'
'
'
FFL 10.070
15.088
'
'
pool gate
A storage under A
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
8
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
8
FFL 10.770
4
4
4
4
drill
The text continues on section 31.