Original source · versioned page text
2016-11-14 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 14 NOVEMBER 2016
Figure 1: Operating Revenue Position by Type (Excluding Rates)
Grants
Other
YTD Actual ($m)
Tax
YTD Budget ($m)
Fees Dividend Interest
$0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0
Operating Expenditure
Council spent $83.9 million on its operating expenditure compared to the budget of $87.2 million
for the full year. A breakdown on each of Council’s expenditure sources is outlined below:
Table 2: Operating Expenditure Performance by Type
Revenue Type Budget Actual Variance
$m $m $m
Employees $27.6 $27.8 $0.2
Materials $40.2 $35.7 ($4.5)
Finance Costs $2.7 $3.3 $0.6
Depreciation $16.6 $17.0 $0.3
Total $87.2 $83.8 ($3.4)
Note: Some rounding
• Employee Costs – Costs of $27.8m exceeded the $27.6m annual budget by $200k. Whilst
overall employee cost management was achieved at an operational level, movements in
provisions for annual and long service level provisions resulted in the budget being
exceeded (whilst having a negligible impact on current cash flows).
• Materials and Services – Actual costs of $35.7m for materials and services were incurred
compared to the budget of $40.2m. Of the $4.5m variance approximately $3m related to
levy expenditure which is restricted for future use (in particular public transport,
environment, heritage, main beach and Hastings St). The remaining positive variances
primarily relate to under-expenditure against contract services, in particular savings against
ICT costs ($138k); savings against fleet operations associated with lower fuel prices, lease
and insurance costs ($500k); waste management landfill and strategy costs ($1.1m).
Council did incur over expenditure in some areas in particular arborist services (due to
significant numbers of requests), street lighting, ringtail quarry cost of sales (offset by
revenue) and Respite Centre contract services.
• Finance Costs – Actual finance costs of $3.3m exceeded budget by $600k due to a year
end adjustment in the calculation to value Council’s future landfill rehabilitation provision (a
non-cash adjustment with the provision fund to be gradually cash backed over the life of
the landfill).
Page 5 of 30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.