Original source · versioned page text
Bushfire Report
Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0081 Bushfire report, Survey, Ecological Assessment Report Email 2 of 3.
Original PDF page 90, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Issue 70 NOVEMBER 2010
Residential boundary fences in
bushfires: How do they perform?
Testing of different
types of fencing
was conductied
at the NSW Rural
Fire Service
Experimental
Testing Site at
Mogo on the
south coast of
NSW in 2005.
BACKGROUND
SUMMARY The findings from post-bushfire
The potential for residential fencing systems to act as a barrier against radiant heat, burning investigations show the importance of
debris and flame impingement during bushfire is of the utmost importance to those whose design and building materials for houses
homes rest in bushfire-prone regions. A 2005 testing project involving the Bushfire CRC exposed to bushfires in Australia. CSIRO
and the CSIRO has revealed that different types of fencing can play an important part in research has shown that the majority
defending homes against the threat of bushfire. Anecdotal evidence existed to suggest of houses, including fencing systems,
that steel fencing offerered greater protection to residential housing against bushfire than destroyed in bushfires usually survived
alternative materials because of its non-combustibility. The Bushfire CRC (with BlueScope the passage of a fire front, but burnt
Steel Limited and CSIRO Bushfire Research) set up a project to research and investigate down during the following few hours due
the performance of residential boundary fencing systems through small and full-scale to fire spreading from ignition caused by
experiments looking at flame and ember propagation in fences, fences as barriers to radiant burning debris (Leonard 2003; Blanchi
heat and flame, and toxic gas emissions from fencing systems. The full results of this research et al. 2004; Ahern et al. 2004; Chen &
is being used by relevant agencies to influence how building codes and planning guides are McAneney 2004).
developed, to provide advice to residents on the level of risk an individual property faces,
and to help develop education programmes for local communities. A survey and studies after the 2003
bushfires in Canberra, for instance,
ABOUT THIS PROJECT showed very high levels of house loss deep
Project D1 Building and Occupant Protection was part of Bushfire CRC into the urban environment (Leonard
Program D: Protection of People and Property. Researchers involved in 2003). Similarly with the 2009 Victorian
the project acknowledge the financial support of BlueScope Steel and bushfires (McAneney 2010). Destroyed
collaboration with the NSW Rural Fire Service. homes showed strong clustering. Most
houses were ignited by ember attack and/or
Author: Justin Leonard (right) is a Bushfire Research Project Leader with
house-to-house ignition. In fact, the post-
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems. For more information about this research
bushfire investigation in Canberra showed
contact Justin Leonard at [email protected]
that in 50% of cases, the bushfire attack
© Bushfire CRC Ltd 2010
1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.