Council archive · source document
Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1
Very large file (35.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
-~
~,
\
Table 2 Mean Annual Pollutant Loads -
Base Case and Developed Mitigated Site (Modelling
Period 1/1/1998 -1/1/2002) Entire 65 ha site
-
30.5 ha Developed
65 ha Base Case Site
Parameter Mitigated Site + 34.5 ha
(ForestedSite) Forested Buffer
Flow (MUYr) 426 431
TSS (kg/yr) 36,500 32,300
TP (kg/yr) 37.0 41.8
TN (kg/yr) 422 490
The pollutant exports from the entire site are seen to decrease for suspended solids, but increase for
total nutrients. This also assumes that the large external buffers to the site do not improve
stormwater quality in passage through them.
1
When these results are considered in the context of typical stormwater management targets that
are applied to most developments, the requisite standards are met, as shown in Table 2.
Table 3 Mean Annual Pollutant Load Reductions -Developed Mitigated Site Only (Modelling
Period 1/1/1998 -1/1/2002)
Pollutant Load Reduction Normal Development
Parameter 30.5 ha Developed Mitigated Site Target
compared to Developed
Unmitigated site
Flow (MUyr) 24.9% NA
TSS (kg/yr) 80.7% 80%
TP(kg/yr) 68.9% 60%
TN (kg/yr) 52.4% 45%
The incorporation basin upstream of Dodonaea Close will serve to detain
of the detention
stormwater emanating from approximate 2.8 ha forested catchment on the opposite site of
an
Beckmans Road. The detention basin is likely to primarily serve a hydraulic control function by
attenuating peak flows through a culvert under the road. The requirement for flow attenuation at this
point relates to the integration of the site stormwater management systems with that of the adjoining
development.
If you have any questions regarding the above advice, please contact Damion Cavanagh on 02 6687
0466.
Yours Faithfully
BMT WBM Pty Ltd
9N\’;_~~~
Damion Cavanagh
Associate
1
SPP Healthy Waters -
comparison of developed unmitigated versus development mitigated. It should be
noted that the assessment considers only the developed portions of the site and excludes undeveloped portions
i.e. the very large external buffer area outside ofthe defined development extent.
C:\B15573.c.dcclF B15573 OJ3.doc A part ofBMT in Energy and Environment
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 35.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.