Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1

of 54

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (35.1 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

                                                                                                                                -~


                                                                                                                           ~,



                                                                                                                                    \


    Table 2 Mean Annual Pollutant Loads              -
                                                         Base Case and Developed Mitigated Site (Modelling
                                     Period 1/1/1998 -1/1/2002)     Entire 65 ha site
                                                                    -




                                                                                    30.5 ha Developed
                                                   65 ha Base Case Site
                            Parameter                                             Mitigated Site + 34.5 ha
                                                      (ForestedSite)                 Forested Buffer
                           Flow (MUYr)                      426                             431
                            TSS (kg/yr)                    36,500                         32,300
                                TP (kg/yr)                  37.0                           41.8

                                TN (kg/yr)                  422                             490




The pollutant exports from the entire site are seen to decrease for suspended solids, but increase for
total nutrients. This also assumes that the large external buffers to the site do not improve
stormwater quality in passage through them.

                                                                                                             1
When these results are considered in the context of typical stormwater management targets that
are applied to most developments, the requisite standards are met, as shown in Table 2.



    Table 3 Mean Annual Pollutant Load Reductions -Developed Mitigated Site Only (Modelling
                                               Period 1/1/1998 -1/1/2002)

                                                Pollutant Load Reduction           Normal Development

                            Parameter          30.5 ha Developed Mitigated Site            Target
                                                   compared to Developed
                                                      Unmitigated site
                           Flow (MUyr)                     24.9%                            NA

                            TSS (kg/yr)                    80.7%                            80%

                             TP(kg/yr)                     68.9%                            60%
                             TN (kg/yr)                    52.4%                            45%




The    incorporation                      basin upstream of Dodonaea Close will serve to detain
                           of the detention
stormwater emanating from           approximate 2.8 ha forested catchment on the opposite site of
                                         an

Beckmans Road. The detention basin is likely to primarily serve a hydraulic control function by
attenuating peak flows through a culvert under the road. The requirement for flow attenuation at this
point relates to the integration of the site stormwater management systems with that of the adjoining
development.

If you have any questions regarding the above advice, please contact Damion Cavanagh on 02 6687
0466.

Yours Faithfully
BMT WBM Pty Ltd




    9N\’;_~~~
Damion Cavanagh
Associate




1
    SPP Healthy Waters      -
                                comparison of developed unmitigated versus development mitigated. It should be
noted that the assessment considers only the developed portions of the site and excludes undeveloped portions
i.e. the very large external buffer area outside ofthe defined development extent.




C:\B15573.c.dcclF B15573 OJ3.doc                                                           A part ofBMT in Energy and Environment

Used in these records

About this file

File size
35.1 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Pre-Request Response Application 132001.210310.1.pdf · 35.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.