07/1841 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132007.1841

Page 2

3

3. The Town Planning Report includes a list of businesses that are proposed to be restricted from
the development. Please provide a list of business types thaf are anticipated to operate on
the site.

The Town Planning Report included a list of businesses that are proposed to be restricted from
the development to ensure than an undesirable ‘industrial’ outcome does not result. Given
that there is such a wide and varied range of tenants potentially suitable for the site it is
extremely difficult fo list exactly who may operate. For this reason we consider it better to
exclude uses rather than list proposed uses. However by way of example uses that could
potentially operate from the site include eco furniture, fittings and fixtures; environmental
management solutions: smart wiring; solar energy solutions; waste management solutions;
water management solutions; water technologies; sustainable pumps, pipes and fittings etc.

4, The Town Planning Report indicates that the proposal involves the relocation of the existing
Noosa Community Training Centre (NCTC), though this facility is not indicated on the plans.
Please provide amended plans indicating a facility of similar size and functionality to that
being replaced.

For reference, the existing facility consists of:
« Approx. 267m? Gross Floor Area + toilet facilities
e includes 3 Classrooms (approx. 60m? each), | Kitchen (training) area (approx.
20m?, and I Administration Office (approx. 67m7); &
e Involves up to 30 trainees at any one time and 5 permanent staff.

The proposal has been amended such that the Education use (Noosa Community Training
Centre} will be occupied within the original conference/gym facility, now labeled as Building
K, and the remainder of the site will be for industrial use. This results in proposed uses now
comprising 9101m2 of industrial use area (9510m2 GFA) and 225m? of education GFA. Building
K continues to include a small gym for use of the industrial tenants and also the ability for a
conference facility co-shared with the training centre classrooms. The NCTC will be
responsible for maintenance and management of the facility and make the
conference/meeting facility available for the use of the industry tenants with a booking system
in place.

5. Provide details of the proposed financial (leasing) arrangements for the relocated NCTC and
indicate how its future viability will be supported by the development.

It is intended that NCTC will have a management agreement in place for the facility with costs
subsidized by the owners and through fees paid by the industrial tenants for use of the
conference/gym facility. These arrangements are not however considered a planning
consideration and are subject to an agreement between the developer and the NCTC.

6. Provide a written indication of how any staging of the development, and works on the
existing NCTC site, will affect the continuity of fhe Centre’s operation.

The conference/training centre will be built with the first stage of development. We are
unable to provide any information at this stage of how development works may impact the
continuity of the centres operation. This is not however a planning consideration and should
have no bearing on the planning assessment of the application.

Page 3

7. Provide further details of how the conference and gym facility is proposed to be utilised by
the tenants of fhe site, including tifling and confractual arrangements and costing
structures for its use.

The conference and gym facility will not be open to the public and is provided as an ancillary
facility for the industrial tenants. This facility will be managed by the NCTC. The gym will be
open at all times for use by other tenants, whereas the conference/meeting facility will need
to be pre-booked. Titling and contractual arrangements will depend upon whether the site is
developed and retained in a single ownership or subdivided under a community titles scheme.
Costs for use of the facility will be incorporated in either lease agreements or body corporate
fees.

8. Provide a detailed assessment of the adequacy of the carparking facilities provided in
association with the conference and gym facility and provide amended plans indicating
increased parking provision as appropriate.

Given that the conference and gym facility is not open to the public and is provided an as
ancillary use for site tenants, no additional parking demand or provision is generated.

Carparking has been provided as follows, in accordance with the requirements of the
Driveways and Carparking Code:

 

Use Carparking Rate Requirement Provided
Industrial 1 space per 50m? of use | 182 19]
area.

Use area = 9101m?2
Education | space per employee & 5+3=8 10
) space per 10 students of
driving age.

NCTC has 5 staff and 30
students/trainees

 

 

 

 

Total | 190 201

 

 

 

 

 

As demonstrated carparking provision has been provided in excess of the requirements of the
Driveways and Carparking Code.

9. Provide confirmation of the proposal'’s consistency with the various Management Plans
submitted in association with the Reconfiguring of a Lot and Operational Works
applications (2006/1594 & 2007/1242). Where there are conflicts, fhe proposal plans -
and/or management plans shall be amended accordingly and resubmitted, clearly
indicating any changes made.

The proposal does not conflict with the amended Management Plans approved with the Lot
Reconfiguration and Operational Works applications.

10. Provide a Bushfire Management Plan for the site that addresses the proposal. The plan
previously submitted has not considered the proposed development.

An amendment Bushfire Management Plan was prepared and submitted subsequent to the
Operational Works approval for the lot Reconfiguration works. This Bushfire Management Plan
considered the proposed development. A copy of the Plan is attached.

Page 4

11. Provide a Stormwater Management Plan for the site that addresses the proposal. The plan
previously submitted has not considered the proposed development.

A Stormwater Management Plan for the site that addresses the proposal has been prepared

by Barlow Greg VDM and is attached.

12. Confirm that there will be no disturbance of existing vegetation or ground levels within the
environmental covenant area in order to complete the development.

Approval has been given by Council for the covenant area to be cleared and utilised for

bushfire buffer purposes.

13. Provide an assessment of the development’s compliance with the streetscape character
requirements of Specific Outcome O107 (items a fo h) of fhe Noosaville Locality Code.

Details of the proposals compliance with the streetscape character requirements Specific
Outcome O107 {items a to h) of the Noosaville Locality Code are detailed below:

 

Specific Outcome

Proposal

 

O107 Buildings and structures are sited and
designed to—

a) provide for a_ consistent building
alignment fronting the street and public
spaces;

The proposal provides for a_ building
alignment fronting the street consistent with
existing development within the Shire
Business Centre and development proposed
in separate application by the applicant
over Precincts E4 and E5.

 

b) present a high quality streetscape
incorporating consistent built elements that
define the street and public spaces as well
as create human scale and visual interest:

The proposal will present a high quality
streetscape with built elements consistent
with existing development within the Shire
Business Centre and development proposed
in separate application by the applicant
over Precincts E4 and £5. The varying
building heights and articulation of the
buildings fronting the street will create
human scale and visual interest.

 

c) be consistent with the bulk and scale of
buildings on adjoining and nearby land;

The proposal will be consistent with the bulk
and scale of buildings existing within the
Shire Business Centre, that proposed by the
applicant on nearby lands and that existing
on adjoining land within the Rene Street
industrial area.

 

d) contribute to their setting including the
skyline;

The proposal comprises = architectural
designed buildings that achieve the
character requirements for the Noosaville
Locality, including pitched roofs, which will
contribute fo their setting including the
skyline.

 

e) present subtle changes in colours, textures
and materials to break up the building
facades;

The proposal includes buildings with varied
materials and finishes that break up the
building facades.

 

f] integrate signage with the building design;

Signage will be provided in accordance with
the Advertising Devices Code.

 

g) integrate landscaping into the building
design and car parking areas; and

 

 

The proposal integrates landscaping into the
building design and car parking areas

 

 

Page 5

 

h) retain and provide areas for outdoor | Outdoor dining is not applicable to the use.
dining and meeting opportunities on the | The proposal provides for meeting
ground level. opportunities with the conference/
gym/training facility.

 

 

 

 

14. Provide details of the extent of any cut or fill required for the proposed development, and
whether this could potentially impact on the vegetation in the adjacent open
space/covenant areas.

The extent of proposed cut/fill for the site is shown on the attached Preliminary Levels and
Cross Section Plans prepared by Barlow Gregg VDM. Potential impact on vegetation within
the covenant area is no longer an issue given Council approval for the vegetation to be
cleared for bushfire buffer purposes.

15. Confirm whether the required shade frees in the carpark can be provided in accordance
Specific Outcome 028 of the Landscaping Code requirements.

Shade trees in the carpark can be provided in accordance Specific Outcome 028 of the
Landscaping Code. This detail will be provided as part of a subsequent Operational Works —
Landscape application.

16. Provide amended plans indicating proposed waste storage/bin enclosure area for the gym
and conference facility.

The amended plans attached provide for a waste storage/bin enclosure for the
gym/conference/training facility.

Land Development

17, Provide amended proposal plans addressing the issues herein, and ensuring that all plans
are drawn to a common scale (eg. 1:500, 1:200, and 1:100, efc).and not a photocopied,
reduced scale.

The amended plans attached address alt relevant issues and have been provided to scale.

18. It is noted from the town planning report submitted with the application that the
development is proposed to be developed in stages. if a staged approval is desired,
please provide plans that clearly indicate this staging so that it is easy for everyone to
understand. In this regard separate pians that indicate each stage of the development are
required with the internal service road and car parking associated with each stage to be
clearly shown on the plans, as well as any other ancillary components that may relate to
the separate stages.

Development staging has not been finalised. As demonstrated with the proposal plans each
Building area has been designed such that it is stand alone {ie has appropriate building to
carparking ratios, landscaping etc) such that it is capable of being developed in separate
stages and also potentially allows for future subdivision under a community titles scheme.
Stage 1 would comprise the full construction of the central spine road which then provides
access to any building area which may be separately developed.

19, Please arrange a suifably qualified traffic engineer to prepare and certify a detailed Traffic
Assessment of the sife , addressing (but not limited to) the following issues:

A traffic assessment report has been prepared by Burchill VDM and is attached.

Page 6

20.

19,1. Demonstrate compliance with Part 14, Division 18 of the Planning Scheme - Transport,
Roads and Drainage Code in relation to Traffic Engineering issues.

The attached traffic assessment report prepared by Burchill VDM demonstrates
compliance with Part 14, Division 18 of the planning scheme in relation to traffic
engineering issues.

19.2. Provide an intersection analysis of all intersections that will result in an increase in
traffic of 5% or more as a result of the proposed development and provide
recommendations as to how these increases can be best dealt with.

The attached traffic assessment report prepared by Burchill VDM provides an intersection
analysis.

19.3. Demonstrate that the overall car park layout complies With the Australian Standard
for Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off Street Car Parking (AS2890. 1).

The attached traffic assessment report prepared by Burchill VDM demonstrates that the
overall car park layout complies with the Australian Standard for Parking Facilities, Part 1:
Off Street Car Parking (AS2890.1).

19.4, Provide justification for the proposed number of car parking spaces and nominate on
the proposal plans the exact break-up/distribution of car park spaces with
consideration given to the differing uses proposed.

No justification is required for the proposed number of carparking spaces as the proposal
complies with the requirements of the Driveways and Carparking Code (refer response to
item 8 above}.

19.5. Demonstrate that the car park layout will function as intended, as concern is raised
over the blind aisles (and hence increased manoeuvring) and generally poor
circulation within the individual carpark areas.

The attached traffic assessment report prepared by Burchill VOM demonstrates that the
carpark will function as intended.

19.6. Demonstrate how pedestrians and cyclists will gain safe access to the site from
external areas (including the various shire business centre uses within the overall
development). The provision of pathways will need to be considered and the need fo.
cross over roads should be avoided where possible , but where required a central
refuge area will be needed.

Pedestrians and cyclists will gain safe access to the site from the external road network and
pathways that are being developed as part of the Shire Business Centre. It would be
unreasonable for any special provision over and above the existing approved road
network provision to be required or imposed on the subject application.

Demonstrate that adequate end of trip facilities are incorporated within the proposed
development, such as bike racks/rails (for visitors ), storage lockers (or .similar) for staff,
change rooms, showering facilities, and drinking fountain (or similar). Given the scale of
the development, shared female/male facilities (unisex facilities) will not be appropriate
and separate facilities will need to be provided. Please illustrate all end of trip facilities on
the proposal plans.

Page 7

End of trip facilities, including 40 bike racks, will be provided with Building K which will be
shared by all other site users. Provision has been made for 3 separate male and 3 separate
female showers/change rooms and storage lockers.

21, Demonstrate compliance with Part 14, Division 20 of the Planning Scheme - Water Sensitive
Design Code.

The attached Stormwater Management Plan prepared by prepared by Barlow Greg VDM
demonstrates compliance with the Water Sensitive Design Code.

22. A development of this scale will be required to provide rainwater tanks with a minimum
capacity of 15 litres /m2 of roof area for use within the buildings and for irrigation purposes .
On this basis, please demonstrate on the proposal plans where these tanks will be located
and if above ground, please illustrate on the plans, elevations and sections of the buildings
and indicate the tank sizes.

The attached Stormwater Management Plan prepared by prepared by Barlow Greg VDM
provides details of required rainwater tanks.

23. Demonstrate on the proposal plans how it is intended fo collect and drain stormwater
runoff, It is nofed in the planning report that if is intended to direct stormwater to Council
infrastructure , but as the site falls towards the rear of the allotment where there will not be
any Council stormwater infrastructure located it is unclear as to how the site will be drained
and whether there will be any impacts as a result. Please provide plans and supporting
documentation to demonstrate how the site will be drained so as to have no external
impacts and no net .increase in runoff. In review of the stormwater design for the site,
consideration should also be given to any overland flow paths that will flow through the
site.

The attached Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Flow Direction Plan prepared by
Barlow Greg VDM demonstrate how Stormwater drainage will be achieved.

24, Provide plans that illustrate the proposed development in relation fo the natural ground
levels of the site. In this regard please show the natural contours on fhe plans, proposed
surface levels, the natural ground level on all elevations of the proposed buildings and
provide at least 6 cross sections through the site (at least 2 in a North South direction and 4
in a east west direction).

The attached Preliminary Levels and Cross Section Plans prepared by Barlow Gregg VDM
provide details of existing and finished ground levels for the site. Cross sections are also
provided with the proposal plans prepared by Sprout Architects.

25. Indicate on the plans, elevations, and cross-sections any cut or fill earth works and hence
any retaining walls that may be required on sife and the height of such walls.

The attached Preliminary Levels and Cross Section Plans prepared by Barlow Gregg VDM
indicate extent of any cut/fill and retaining walls.

26, Please show on the proposal plans the actual location of the existing sewer main that
traverses the site (including any easements) and any manholes that will be located within
the site. Should this sewer be relocated, also show on the proposal plans the intended
location of the sewer main and the easement that will be required over the new sewer.

The attached Sewerage Layout Plan prepared by Barlow Gregg VDM shows the location of
the existing sewer that traverses the site, together with the proposed relocation.

Page 8

27. The waste areas within the proposed development do not adequately allow for the use of
bulk bins. Many premises will be able to use wheelie bins thaf can be placed af the
kerbside for collection, however some businesses will require bulk bins to, be serviced on
site. Council requires that any waste vehicle that enters onfo a property must be able to
enter and exist the site in a forward direction. The current proposal would require waste
vehicles to reverse out creating safety problems and a more flexible and compliant waste
management solution needs fo be proposed.

The proposal plans have been amended to provide improved access locations for waste bin
enclosures,

The Information and Referral Stage of IDAS has now concluded. We ask that you now provide
details of adjoining owners in order that we may commence the public notification of the
application.

Should Council have any query regarding this matter, please contact our office.

Yours faithfully
KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES

Scott Sobey
DIRECTOR

Page 9

N\obs07D41 Popoeed Commercial Lot loc 81S Devslopments\Onrsinga WchCAD'ModeHO7ON1 SITE PLAN pin - 4 66 PM. 1801/7008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 vag

at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK
FOR
S & L DEVELOPMENTS
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

DRAWING SCHEDULE
$D01 OVERALL SITE PLAN
SD02 BUILDING K - DRAWINGS
$D03 BUILDING A- DRAWINGS
$D04 —_ BUILDING B - DRAWINGS
$D05 BUILDING C - DRAWINGS
SD08 BUILDING D - DRAWINGS
$D07 BUILDING E - DRAWINGS
$D08 BUILDING F - DRAWINGS
SD09 BUILDING G - DRAWINGS
SD10 BUILDING H - DRAWINGS
SD11 BUILDING | - DRAWINGS
$D12 BUILDING J - DRAWINGS
$D13 SITE SECTIONS

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN GATE

ot

‘A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WENPE OV0R07
8 RESPONSE TOCOUNCH. © 160106
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

Gr.

architects
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS. PARK

6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE QId 4558
PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC —QId. 4558

PH : 07 8443 5028 FAX:07 478 2380
ABN 23123917 724
EMAIL: [email protected] au

ab
project
PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

COVER SHEET

cate AUG 07 drawn CD scaie 1:200

érewing n0.07041 SDOO reson A
be 4

Copynght of nas document semans the excise
propery of SPROUT ARCHITECTS @TY LTR
‘ADI Za 123.017 724

Conirctors are to very al cxmenaiena and levels on
‘nvr prot fo commencing Repor a ciscrapanians 0
Uke Arcivect, Use tgiree amnenaans preference
wa seated

Page 10

Niv008107041 Poposee Commercial Lot 3 for S.S OnvelnpmanssOnnehgriArcCADRMedetO7D41 SITE PLAN pn - 400 PM. 1710122008

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE

tO tt
A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL wees ovoso7

B_-RESPONSE TO. COUNCAL o 16018
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

ree. BUILDING K

> IN GROUND
> S RAIN WATER
> a TANK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BUILDING J ahs C . - BUILDING A
ihe 7 X \ \ 6
\ y 1 ' , t ,
Oo Be had ag | 4 me PE Pr 1 &
I ! “ ! ‘ ‘ ‘
n we toga 7 a #
4 wh " Ww ; — = ral = ABOVE GROUND
é af
1 \e'Qh ia loys
Vb. ¥ * yi
é
BUILDING! | = BUILDING B SITE SUMMARY
iy, A = TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS "
in ‘ . f MI TOTAL NUMBER OF TENANTS 33
&- g 2 © AREAS
5 “ ABOVE GROUND SITE AREA 20842,5m?
6 RAIN WATER TANK TOTAL TENANCY GFA 9839m?
2a } . (INCLUDING MEZZANINE}
AANWATER ws \ , t SITE COVER 471.2%
BUILDING H f= oF aN # BUILDING C caneanans
ry ty ty Vay CARS PROVIDED 201
aa aN \ v
a Lt , mnt LANDSCAPING
- a \! . ABOVE GROUND LANDSCAPING REQUIRED 15% 326m?
6284 t i RAIN WATER TANK LANDSCAPING PROVIDED 22% 4653m?
7 ~
BUILDING G ie = aa E}  BUILDINGD ss peyeariat bs.
t
@ ve Z Ty >. E < i (
Lom & Hl ,
s famwaren "ff , } S 0 HO) /
8 DAK é eG i Z / J,
a-- Tt a -—sa we
tS tees r yet See oe
74 4 1h 5! ABOVE GROUND architects
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
as es G/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE = Qid 4558
PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qld 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5479 2380
ABN 23 123.917 724
EMAIL: [email protected]
BUILDING F BUILDING E ‘we
projec

 

 

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

ve
’~

 

 

 

 

 

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD

902
| NOOSAVILLE

SP163309

 

drawing

OVERALL SITE PLAN
OVERALL SITE PLAN

Scale 1.500 date AUG OF = drawn CD scale 1:500

  

Copyngp of Pas cocanend remans Bre exchusne
Gropany of SPROUT ARCMTEGTE PTY UTD.
‘AB 23 122 917 724

i ‘ie pro io commencing Regon ol Gxcranzsncars 3)

1

Page 11

N-Usba®7O11 Poposee Commetco’ Lot 2 fot S.S Grrelopments Orne WONCAD MadeNO7DL' BITE PLAN pin - 4 00 PM. 1720172008

 

 

cH LEVEL
GUZNG

 
   

 

 

see Dror
PT rerrs

TEI — a a <—

  

RENDERED BLOCK

 

   

NATURAL EXISTING FULL HEIGHI
CARRS

STEEL FRAMED AWISING PROJECTION ‘GROUND LINE (DOTTED)

NO COMBUSTRLE MATERULS,

WEST ELEVATION

        

\ , kat oF we, Scale 1:200
\
\
\ ‘
\ ed ~ ‘
\ % ON bern
oe .
\ s
N
\ i .
. S

GROUND URE (DOTTED)

  
 

Fuld MEXGHT

~ Tac osins
ane

‘GROUND LINE (DOTTED;

NORTH ELEVATION

  

AGH LEVEL
METAL ROOF

REV DESCRIPTION ORAWN DATE

CoO

A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WEIPS OM0907
160108

B —_-RESPONSE TO COUNCIL a
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

STEEL FRAMEDAYINNG
NO COMBUSTIBLE a
MATERILS,

Scale 1:200

Wir LEVEL

 

 

SHEETING
STEEL FRAMED AWNING,

NO COMBUST BLE

MATER

‘RENDERED BLOCK
wal

STEEL FRAMEDAWNING
ROCOMBLSTIMLE
NATERALS

 

 

 

 

GAZKG

      

FUULHEIOnT

GUNG GROUND UNF (DOTTED)

, NORTH WEST ELEVATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

                            

 

 

         

 

 

 

\
ROOF PLAN NORTH EAST ELEVATION 7 Scale 1:200
Scale 1:200 Scale 1:200
eta sett _— HH LEvEL (— sususe mea Sst
oor SHEETING Gate CwLOGURE ROOF SIEETNS,
LOST aro [
LF
7 T
+ +
\ RENDERED BLOCK r RATURAL EXISTING RENOERED BLOCK
‘\ BUILDING K wait ROUND UNE ATTED, wa
‘ ABEAS
> SOUTH ELEVATION
SITE AREA= 1078m"
, OVERALL BUILDING
’ ‘ant GFA
Grane / “4 SITE COVER = 36% Seen oune geting
/ -< CARPARKING TEE FaAweD ANG
yy a“ PROVIDED CARS © 10 CARS RAS cae
S -
v~ RENDERED BLOCK
worbaemacrvae gn LANDSCAPING sas sea m2
MATERWLE r’ - PROVIDED 37% 2397
\ ‘ ra 2 snc fects
Fa \ aso ee . MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
enc 7 GORD Lae DOTTED) 6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE Qld 4558
eae \ PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qld 4558
\s so PH : 07 5443 6028 FAX:07 5479 2380
. o
Lan . a SECTION A-A ABN 23123 917 724
ts 7 ™. Scale 1:200 EMAIL: [email protected]

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

project

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

 

at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scale 1:200

 

 

 

LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

 

drawing

 

 

 

BUILDING K - DRAWINGS

 

 

 

date AUG 07

rewingro.Q7041 SD02

drawn CD scale 1:200

revision B

Page 12

{8 Uope0704 | Popowed Conrnercasl Lot 2 for $1.5 OnvelaprmenrOrmengathecMCADWadNPO706{ SITE PLAN pin - 4.01 PLL 17.01/2008

AWAING BELOW

11 UP PANEL
PARA

  

\

FC ARAN:

Scale 1:200

 

(UNE OF WALL UNDER

 

 

 

 

  
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'
|
fn on wxcor s-cernon cuzans \
\ toon aoe | uewne va = ,
| I ce == I Lyne 1 ly- == Il ly-==a
zt ru o faa == !
! | { it {
| ry \ \ | \
i
|
! |
1 TENANT 1 TENANT 2 q TENANT 9 TENANT 4
| + 67 mF MEZZ 67 m? MEZZ. 67 nm? MEZZ 87 mm? MEZZ |
|
\
eo FFL 7.70 yoo FFL 7.70 we FFL 7.70 le |
| BELOW buon BELOW \
|__ |
1
'
}___it00_ iy. I
|
|
|
1
|

 

---4

 

Scale 1:200

(MEZZANINE LEVEL PAN or ©

Been Se

 

 

 

 

We
A

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

‘\

aE

LoT1 * CARPARKING ©

 

 

1581m? ve ton
sworrnont ~ — A PANEL VERTICAL ——
GUAZKG 766 0008 2
Loaninc gay f° LOADING BAY LOADING Bay r Loapinig say [V. ==
VA Te 4 ‘ Pei) os Py) os
“| i / \ / \ / Y 7
, & \ can) \ |
iN boyy, 4 ,41 8 ve & rg
a \7 q \eoog ve \eo
' 38 a! nN At A &
, * oN é aX § wy 4 7. g
| , NB ,oN 8% 1 oN ® roy &
“ Lg \ og FFL470 ? \ 5 FFL 4.70 FFLAT0N ¥ FFL 470 \ ®

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘ \ / \y

TENANT 2
S 1470 mm? GFA

 

TENANT 3.
170 mm? GFA

67 m* MEZZ 67 mi’ MEZZ

 

 

 

 

 

{0 COVRUSTIN E VATERILS.

Sn WOE FRE BUTER

\
NOUNDENG

 

 

“He » GROUND FLOOR PLAN

TERE é

Scate 1-200

it a
mi
}oo\e-
|

A TENANTS.

SHOPERONT GLAZING:

UaaT WEIGHT
WALL PANEL

 

AATIRA ESTING.
GROUND URE (DOTTED)

NORTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

 

FEATURE BLADE WALL

conven
ROOF SHEETING

THT UP PANEL
WITH BTRUCK JOINTS

(GATED PANE: DOOR,

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE
el
‘®—-DAISSUE TO COURCIL WENPE 000807
8 RESPONSE TOCOUNCRL co entne
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

UGHT WEIGHT
WALL PANEL

BLADE WALL

     

WEST ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

et

THT UP PANEL
‘eam STRUCK ——
JON URES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GROUND LINE (DOTTED!

SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

 

 

SATLRAL EXISTING. '
‘GROUND LINE {DOTTED}

EAST ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

—— Taro an WALL —>,

 

 

SITE COVER 45.7%

CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 19 (1:50)
PROVIDED CARS = 19

LANDSCAPING
REQUIRED 10% 1581?
PROVIDED $5 4% = 244 8?

wots

\

‘GROUND LINE (DOTTED)

SECTION B-B

Scale 1:200

Garou

architects

MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS: PARK
G/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE —QId 4558.
PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qid 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 6479 2380

ABN 23129 917 724
EMAIL: [email protected]

a OI_OF
project

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

an
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

BUILDING A - DRAWINGS

—

date AUG 07 drawn CD scale 1:200

drawingne.QO7041 SDO3 revision B
oe 4

Capyrsns af tas cocumare mina te exch
propery of SPROUT ARCHBTECTS PTY LTD
i ‘ADR 23 420 917 724

Page 13

|N Uobai07D4 Poposed Commertia! Lat J lot 5.8 Orveloment DrawgelArenCADModshOTDM1 SITE PLAN pn = 4°91 PM. 37/01/2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

; EG
|
1 aaa SS SS
I wewu—
1 Blow =
S |

| ==
\ “
I
|
I
| ec
\ a=
\ ¥
{ SSS ——
( =
I = hs
\ ax
{
|
| = SS
Je eee aaee : ---4
| ROOF PLAN

Scale 1:200

1

rerarsosn} TENANT 4
&- 1 | Som? Mezz woe '

' ion

' FFL 7.75

1

 

 

 

 

 

ee!

SSHOPERONT.
oun

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 &
4 x
g (CEB) TENANT1 ,
Ce 350m? GFA /
18 é 50m? MEZZ ,
FFL ATS Jf
aa
Z
fi
Fe
FPLAIS el
£32
TENANT 2
350m? GFA
~. ‘50a? MEZ2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

i ~\N 1
by ; +

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
a Scale 1:200

 

 

4 :

REV DESCRIPTION ORAWN DATE
et
DARSSUE TO COUNCIL WEIPB 0N0G07
RESPONSE TO COUNCIL cc onine
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

mre
Pee TH
STRUCK SORTS

 

 

 

ATURAL EXISTING,
‘GROUND LAE

 

SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

METAL ROOF
‘SHEETING

  

WEST ELEVATION
~ Scale 1:200

META. ROOF
SAEEING

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NATURAL EXETINS

‘GROLND LINE (00 TTED,

Se S- =
| NATURAL OUSTING: RATURAL XUSTING
BE REE ay et
!

|

i-& NORTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION - Scale 1200

| Scale 1:200

|

I

| 1 AL SHEET

[Bilin po

!

_- a __| ee Ll iis

! scar esnael (ee

I fu FAL Fat

|

|

|

SECTION C-C

 
  

_. Gromit

architects

7
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE Qld 4558
PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Id 4558
¥ auonss PH 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5479 2380
REA! ABN 23123 917 724

EMAIL: [email protected] au

a
Project

Vom AREA = 157m"

QERALL BULOING PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK
100m? MEZZ_
‘B0OnF TOTAL
2TENANTs tor
SITE COVER =47% S & L DEVELOPMENTS
CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 16 (1:50r7) at
PROMDED CARS = 16
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
LANDSCAPING NOOSAVILLE
REQUIRED 10% = $57.7rr"

PROVIDED 18.6% = 310.2507

drawing

BUILOING B - DRAWINGS

date AUG 07 arwn CD scate 1:200

 

drawing 1.07041 SDO4 revision B
4 1

\ PNY

 

Copyngnt of ths oocument remains the Exch
Property ol SPROUT ANCHITECTS PTY LTD.
SENT 73817 724

Page 14

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN OATE
re
A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WEsPS ovoa07
B RESPONSE TOCOUNCHL co tenis
REQUEST FOR INFORHATION

rare

(WALL PANEL SHOP FROAT eT WEIGHT (ADE WALL

GLAZING WALL PANEL, {ATH STRUEK JO NTS

 

[— MRT UP WALL PANEL [ETN SHEET
WITH STRUCK JOS ROOEING,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scale 1:200 iii fH m wn

------- wort rr oe ---- ee ~---
NATURAL BXSTING NATURAL EXBTAG.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

|
\
|
I I
oy ; \
| | ' |
tl * ! SaDUe Une worreD) {ROUND Une DOTTED
| | !
1] H 1 ' \ ;
+O pews | ewer |! SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION
cq ' I =
roost 154 mm? MEZZ \ I 436m? MEZZ 1 ! | U - Scale 1:200
ot v0 1 00 } \ Scale 7-200
! HOOR 1 FLOOR
1 tS 1 Lon ! 1 mow | I
1 , -
' FFL7.95 ' i FRLT.95 ' oe [ oe
! 1
{ ' \ ' ! |
{ 1 ' 1 ! | mez
bho . | -—
| | noun
‘ ay 1 _ aes
\ Y | DB a nie ;
WATURAL EXISTING
GROUND LINE. ~~
Leo poses! Pee end LN
: . a
© (QQ Wit:
SECTION D-D \ . H i '
. Scale 1:200 INA LLY
Y o™ __ ne
Zs architects
¢ MAROOCHYDORE SUSINESS PARK
. 6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE = Qid 4558
BUILDING C \ PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qld 4558
. PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX07 5479 2380
AREAS \ ABN . 23: 123 9417 724
SITE AREA= 145770? \ EMAIL: [email protected]
‘ a OOOO___™'.-——scuat
project

(660m GFA

220 mF MEZZ
TOTAL S50e?

2 TENANTS
LOADING Bay SITE COVER = 444%

(CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 19 (1:50)
PROVIDED CARS = 19.

LANDSCAPING
REQUIRED 10% = 157.7"
PROVIDED 15.3% = 240.2re

OVERALL BUILDING \
. PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

 

drawing

BUILDING C - DRAWINGS

date AUG 07 drawn CD scaie 1:200

drawing 2.07041 SDO5 revision B
— 1

(GROUND FLOOR PLAN é meena wma

f } Scale 1:200 wmaed

 

N Usba07D41 Popoaee Commertio! Lt lor S- Dvesiopments Drawings ArcMCADIModehO7041 SITE PLAN phn - 4°01 PM. 1790172008

Page 15

Hobs 704 1 Popnanet Commmerie! Lol 3 far SLE Devetogmenrs\OrmmingivenCADIMOCCHOTOAT SITE PLAN ph = 4:01 PR. 3720172008

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE

RTT Nem

‘A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WELPR 030907

8 RESPONSE TO COUNCIL ao 160108
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

a matte —
WEST ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOUTH ELEVATION

  

 

Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROOF PLAN
Scale 1:200-

 

V

“ = |
__ 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION

Scale 1:200

  
  

 

Scale 1:200

 

 

 

vou
FLooR
RELOW

            
  

sHoPsHONT wwe
GLAZING

  

 

TENANT 2
128m? MEZZ

FFL 8.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i =~ ==, i - x
ee nn ee ee ee ne eee eee ee ee ee Be eee | ©) i ‘
L an = O i
SREhen Nw) I Ly
a . ee
SECTION E-E architects
. Scale 1:200 MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
. 6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE Qld 4558
& PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qld 4558
~ 4 PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5478 2380
ABN 28129917 724
BUILDING D EMAIL: [email protected]
: AREAS
§ project
SITE AREA = 1432rn? PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK
‘0anv GFA OVERALL BUILDING
128m* MEZZ GFA for
4 Bent ez S & L DEVELOPMENTS
FFL 5.00 . Boeke? TOTAL
S$
if ae RRS «1 (15004 LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
MRED eH
FFLS00 ea PROMDED CARS 1° NOOSAVILLE
------5 B22 --
LANDSCAPING
o “ REQUIRED 10% = 143.2nv drawing
TENANT 2 PROVIDED 23% = 301m
261m? GFA BUILDING D - DRAWINGS
$28? MEZZ 4
‘ Komnds ] LY" gate AUG 07 — drawn CD scale 1:200
~ ees drawing 0.97041 SDOG revision B
‘a 4 &) A :

 

 

 

 

 

Scale 1:200

Page 16

Nivea T041 Popoare Commerri! Lot 3 tor 8.8 Developments Drmenghre MCAD WOceNITON SITE PLAN pin - 4101 PAL. 170172008

/
Z
’
LUNE OF AWNING
-potcceT wow

       

I ENE OF FACADE

gle

UNE OF noun

Scale 1:200

eG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

«6

|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yoo veo
FigoR Seton FLOOR BELOW

vow

FLOOR

LOW z Ei
FFL 8.00
TENANT? TENANT 8
472 né MEZZ 2.2 mt MEZZ

 

 

 

 

 

 

-ro ‘sioerRont Ayn OER
oxno
t
i I I I
] L
| v0 ve FFL 8.00 {FFL 8.00 FFL 8.00 J FFL 8.00
Fioon sevow oon ee.ow
' von woo von
\ . oon roo | foo
tetow tov | tom
| i i
| F800 FFL 8.00
1 TENANT 3 TENANT 4} TENT ‘ST me a
47.2 10 147.2 00 472 4
TENANT 1 TENANT 2
| 412.9 MEZZ 472 0? MEZZ Merz pez Mez  }MEZZ
|
|
l
l
|

 

 

|
|
|
|
!
I
I
I
|
|
FFL 8.00 '
|
I
|
|
|
|
|

 

 

 

 

{CASIONAL SINGLE UNIT TRUCK

  

1

---4

{LOADING BAY

 

 

 

 

 

>| LB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I
{
{
I
I
I
4. LOADING BAY | t 2 rN Lb T LOADING BAY e T 7 LOADING | I
. . |
NF ¥ yy tr Lf
Nn TT 7 |
{ TENANT 1 TENANT 2 vena! * or PS heNanta Penang) ) oe Pt rehawres TENANT? TENANTS !
102 § a? GEA 102.5 07 GFA 102.5 m GAA rd: 41025 mr GFAP 1025mrGFA S$ 1102.5 m? GEA 102 5 ar GFA 02.5 nv GFA 1
a ' 47.2 ne MEZZ ADD MERZ FEY 47.2 oP MRZZ, | A?2m' MEZZ | 47.2 MEZZ 1 47.208 MEZZ 47.2 nt MEZZ 47.20? MEZZ FER \
i i Fei sioo VERE! — Fe 5.00 | FFL 5.00! eA a ' FFL 5.00 |
— = ’ | s
1 UNE OF MEZINONE ABO JURE OF HEZZANINE ABINE ro ! \ } Une oF uez2aune 522 fn oF MEZZO 201
pee Sree ee YJ oy ‘ j Log ol Pine or EZR Re RO ere oe :
| \ oP. ’ Dv Pty hat fry \ ape z seo
FFL 5.007 FFL 5.00 ” BZ, ude, # Hy VPoud FFL 5.00 FFL 5.007 §
' Rs L509 Bey rAdrog g FLS oF a
I > * Pi no 4 hi ae 1g mx K z 4
i ve a as si 1s al 1% PRN y > $337,
“ A Ve RR ge fy if Bu Me a A .]- “A 539
; a sb rs p joo} peal 3 a So gy Of
T cE Tv ole or Td
' . srwoe ome FER 44
\ Bear as

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

  

Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE

| ESSE TOOL

A DAISSUETO COUNCIL WEIPE 0M?

8 RESPONSE TOCOUNCIL oa se0 08
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

NATURAL OuSTING

‘GROUSO UNE (DOTTED)

EAST ELEVATION

 
 

 

 

Tm

 

 

 

 

 

   

‘GROUND UNE (DOTTED)

SOUTH ELEVATION

 

 

 

 

SECTION F-F
Scale 1:200

 

 

; a I
\ | Hh
\ i!

4 ee
~ a rtd
architects

MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE Qld 4558

PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qi 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 6479 2380

ABN 23123 917 724
EMAIL: [email protected]
project

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

BUILDING E - DRAWINGS

cate AUG 07 drawn CD scale 1:200

arawing 0.07041 SDO7 revision B

Canyons of wes document mane #9 archane
property of SPROUT ARCHITECTS OTY LTD
ABN) 123 817 724

Page 17

| ROOF PLAN é

Scale 1:200

    

LE OF AN LINE OF AWNING
ELON

 
       

{UNE OF FACADE

8.55] FFL 8.55

FFL 8.55, FFL 8.55, x FFL 8.55

TENANT B TENANT Mi 2 TENANT {
493 mt MEZZ. 41,3. 0 MEZZ, 49.3. MEZZ

 

MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN —_—
Scale 1:200

 

LOADING BAY

 

LOADING BAY
LOADING BAY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1 Uoba80704 1 Poposed Commarea! Lol 3 lot SLE Covaleemen\DreningaArhICADINOdERITOL SITE PLAN phn - 402M. 1770117008
soe

 

p
TENANT 8 TENANT? Tente Hrdwants | renanta! So) J fenanr a TENANT? TENANT 4
102.5 mi? GFA 402 5 mm GFA 102.5 m' GFA WORS me GFA | 1025m?°GFA \ Ba 1025 m°GFA 102.5 me’ GFA. 102.5 ne? GFA
41,3 mt ME2Z AL Se? ME2Z 41.3m?MEZZ 1 45.3 mt MGZZ 4 4 44.3 mt MEZZ 44.3. MEZZ 41.3? MEZZ
c FFL 5.55 FFL 5.56 A 5
f
Fine or uzawine store nc oF wean 26H gi 3 7a cpus ne ozone
raczaneanoretncormnmnce| Bi Py, i PB Py kU mt ornezzmune anove lune of vezzanns aa
\ FFLSSS »“ |’ FFLSSS 7 g'o4 \e  FFLSS5)“ |. FFL5SS ¢
Soe Noy pod! ‘ ’ x “
bn >< 5 i yt e ‘< >
Roe aN Se 8 q oy ae
S ’ a g f LP x . S : ‘AGI
a wpe NS. als a Ade 4
oF oP v
a ee foam ra
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Seale 1:200 '

  

     

HAZING

ALUUNIUM FRAMED ———

REV DESCRIPTION ORAWN DATE

 

‘A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WELPE 030807
8 RESPONSE TOCOUNCE. o e018
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOOT TTT

uy

 

 

 

 

 

SEE

 

 

— oo =

    
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

BUILDING F

‘AREAS
SITE AREA © 207501?

‘OVERALL BUILDING

6207 GFA

‘380? MEZ2

1150er? TOTAL

@ TENANTS: _—

SITE COVER = 41%) .
—

Spratt ING
SCANRED CARS © 23 (1:50

PROVIDED CARS © 23

ANDSCAPING
REQUIRED 10% = 207 Ser?
PROVIDED 20% © 416m

      

SOUTH ELEVATION

 

Scale 1:200

 

MULLIN LEVEL —

 

 

 

 

SECTION G-G

  

 

 

 

Scale 1:200

 

   

EAST ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

Garant

MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE == Qid 4558

 

 

PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE 8C =—QId 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 $479 2380

ABN 23.123 997 724
EMAIL: [email protected]. au

aL
project

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

far

S$ & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

BUILDING F - DRAWINGS

gate AUG 07 drawn CO

arwing e.07041 SDOS revision B

scale 1:200

Conymagr of tvs document wane Se niche
Froomty of SPROUT ARCHITECTS PTY LTD
ABN 123 617 724

Page 18

NAobe107041 Popoend Commercial Let 3 for SLE Devetoomens\Drawings WeNCADVodel07041 SITE PLAN pin - 4 62M. 180172008

1920

rz

ax0.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* pithy
ROOF PLAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

TENANT 2
128m? MEZZ

FFL 8.45

 

  
 

 

303m? GFA
128m? MEZZ

 

 

 

FFL 5.45

 

 

FFL 5.46

 

 

 

 
 

CARPARKING

 

        

 

 

 
  

we

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Scale 1:200

  

BUILDING G
AREAS
SITE AREA = 127m?

‘OVERALL BUILDING
(600m? GFA

200m* MEZZ

800m? TOTAL

2 TENANTS:

SITE COVER = 48%

CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 16 (150m")
PROVIDED CARS = 16

LANDSCAPING
REQURED 10% = 127-2n¥
PROVIDED 138% = 177 8?

 

EAST ELEVATION

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

Scale 1:200
Gaon ne OTED,
WEST ELEVATION

  

Scale 1:200

  

SECTION H-H

 

Scale 1:200

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN OATE

REL

A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WELPE 0309107
o 160108,

8 RESPONSE TOCOUNCEL
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

Lor wascer (OOF OVER HANG
‘WALL PANEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

TTL JP WALL PANEL WEG
WITH STRUCK JOWTS WALL PANEL

 

SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

           

Conran,
FL

- Germ

NATURAL EXTON, -

GROWO UNE (DOTTED)

architects
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE §Qid 4558

0 BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC —Qid 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5479 2380

ABN 23 123.917 724

EMAIL: [email protected]

>
project

PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

BUILDING G - DRAWINGS

cate AUG O7 = drewn CD scale 1:200
orewing 20.7041 SDOQ cevision B

be

Page 19

NAsobs107041 Popoenc Commercial Lt ler SLS GewlopmnenOrawigiiirehCAD MedeAO7D41 SITE PLAN pin - 4.53 PR. 1401/2008

  

ROOF PLAN

 

Scale 1:200

sync over
008 |

Td

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TENANT 3
88.5 m* MEZZ

FFL 8.40 L

TENANT 2
88.5 m? MEZZ

FFL 8.40 L

 

 

 

 

yoo voo
FLooR

BELOW BELOW

 

 

TENANT 1
88.5 m? MEZZ

FFL 8.40

 

 

 

 

\
I
! Oo
MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN
Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN OATE

oO

‘A -DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WELPE 00807

B RESPONSE TO COUNCIL oO e018
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

FEATURE BADE WALL
TH STRUCK JONTS

‘shoprRoT —
GAZING

METAL SHCET
ROOFING

META SCREEN TAT ue Pant

TH STRUDK JOS |

SHOPFRONT
GLENS

‘CONCRETE SUB,
PROIECTON

   

  
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

 

TUTUP Pe GLADE WALL

Ter uP PANa
wit STRUCK one) 1wsTH STRUCK ows]
v

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

}+——__}

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NATURAL EXISTING

GROUND LINE (OOTTED)

 

 

NATAL DUSTING

‘GROUND LINE (Q0TTED)

SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

WEST ELEVATION

 
  

Scale 1:200

en,

Grant

 

  

     

|
| ae
. SECTION I-I
Peg A ~ Scale 1:200
u fA Bee NE ENE soem £53. - ES
Le architects
i ok MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE = Qid 4558
ae Ke BUILOING H PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC —QId. 4558
Al Hl wn ole fe > |e PH : 07 5443 6026 FAX:07 6479 2380
ABN 23: 123 O17 724
| ! oxy LOT8 BW) ‘ SITE AREA= 1825m? EMAIL: [email protected]
\ : ‘ MEZZANINE 15257 SHOPFRONT > te —0.0—>——ot
yt) see 7] one OVERALL BUILDING project
y T T ‘earn! GEA PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK
YY Layer IY T cron aay IY bier
\ l \ I, “ TENANTS. tor
r S 7 . 7 oy , SrEconmnearx S & L DEVELOPMENTS
: ( . ’ toy ‘ §
q | x , N + ‘ CARPARKING
” Noe ‘ Ne ' x REQUIRED CARS = 19(150m7)
| FFL5.40 »~ FFL 5.40 ' x FFLS40 | \/ PROVIDED CARS = 19 at
\ Y
. us . \ ue X ' , . Laupscarins LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
| - . ’ \ , 1 REQURED 10% + 120) NOOSAVILLE
t , . i s \ 1 x \ i PROVIDED 10% = 152.5?
4------ BLL ee
| ’ . |
J. TENANT 3 TENANT 2 TENANT 1— —-} * drawing
I | 2345 av GFA x 234.5 m! GFA Ee 214.5 mt GFA | BUILDING H - DRAWINGS
qi 88.5 m? MEZZ 4 85.5 a MEZZ N 88.5 m? MEZZ !
Al 5 ik
e -—-aT f gate AUG O7 — drawn CD scale 1:200

GO

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Scale 1:200

  

 

drewing 0.07041 SD10 ‘vison B
$e

 

‘Copyngrd ofa docurnent rene ta axchuiee
$reomty of SPROUT ARCHITECTS PTY LTD.
AGN 23 123017 724

Page 20

N WobsW07041 Paposen Commie! Lal for SLE Developmen ADrncingaihrcNICADWodenO?O41 SITE PLAN pin - 4 STEM. 18/01/2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

%
!
1
I
1
e552
!
ad. = ! &
zs !
— [
caxtuensen i
Semin BELOW |
ae I
\
re \
\
gaz ™ \
‘
\
\
\
C7 ar \
ROOF PLAN
Scale 1:200
L !
1
| !
$ ~~ Verret | ft
| t
{ ‘
i TENANT1 '
Se ert i
oe mx | [2 5
, ~ —— |EVERED
faminG OR 1
1
1 '
'
\
v0 2
Hook \
auoW
\
TENANT 2 }
50m! MEZZ \
i FFL 8.25 \
EEE :
iH \
~--- eee ee ee ,

 

 

 

 

 

MEZZANINE LEVEL PLAN

  

Scale 1:200

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1
\ ;
1 ‘y 2 ae, g
TENANT 4 VON oe g
4 350 GFA to 1, smo g
> 14 | aman,
| SomP MEZZ 7 p vas
* FFL 5.25 Ch
HF
wezane
LOADING BAY OvER
~~
: 7
{ TENANT 2 ) 3
350m? GFA
50m! MEZZ

 

CARPARKING

 

 

 

 

*

 

Lao

GROUND FLOOR PLAN __
“Scale 1:200

      

  

CANTLEVERED
am

 

NATURAL EXISTING

EAST ELEVATION

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE
Oot
A DAISSUE TO COUNCIL WEIPE 030907
B RESPONSE TO. COUNCIL oo 160108
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Ta UP WALL
PANEL wit
STRUCK JONTS.

ANG.ED FACADE:

 

 

GROUND UKE DOTTED; GROUND UKE (DOTTED)

NORTH ELEVATION

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scale 1:200 Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L NATURAL EXTING.

  

BUILDING |
AREAS

SITE AREA = 145Sm?
OVERALL BUILDING

‘Toon? GFA

‘$00e* MEZZ

800? TOTAL

2 TENANTS

SITE COVER = 50 6%

 

CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 16 (15007)
PROVIDED CARS = 16

LANDSCAPING
REQUIRED 10% =u!
PROVIDED 13.2% ®

  

‘GROUND LW (DOTTED)

WEST ELEVATION

{TURAL OST

‘GROUND UNF (DOTTED)

SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

 

 
 

Scale 1:200

TATU HAL
ane wT ~ |

 

 

 

SECTION J-J

 

 

 

 

(GROUND UWE (DOTTED) ee
architects
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE = Qid 4558
PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC Qld 4558

le 1:

Seale 1:200 PH : 07 $443 5028 FAX:07 $478 2360
23: 123.917 724

[email protected]

ABN
EMAIL:

project
PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

for

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

By
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

drawing

BUILDING I - DRAWINGS

date AUG 07 drawn CD scale 1:200

drawing 2.07041 SDAL cevision B

XQ

 

Copyngnt of tea document rein Ye axchuahe
propery of SPROUT ARCHITECTS PTY LTD
AGN 23.12) 917 724

Page 21

1 obs107D41 Poposad Commercial Lot ler SLS OevslopmentiSridngaV\rchiCAD Mod4hOTDAI SITE PLAN pin - 4.59PM. 1601/2008

 

|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t
I
I
I
I
1
L _
| 6
; ROOF PLAN
Scale 1:200

OVER Leoc

FFL 8.20 } FFL 8.20

|
\
|
I
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
\
I
|
\
\
\
L
L-

yn

LOT 10°

1721 /

FFL5.201 \

' Vy
' vv
TENANT 1/4
102 rh GRAY
55 rh MEZA.

hy

ty

My

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

   

 

 

 

PACKED END WALL —)

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE
OTN -an0— OOO
‘A DAISSUE TOCOUNCIL WEUPR OyOUNT
B —_RESPONSE TO COUNCIL @ 160108
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

‘SHOPFRONT
GAINS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

NATURAL EXSTING

(GROUND LE (DOTTED)

EAST ELEVATION

 
 

Scale 1:200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NORTH ELEVATION
Scale 1:200

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

METAL ROOF “—

 

 

FTO TTT PETTITT

 

TTT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aTuRAL ESTOS
‘GROUND LME DOTTED:

WEST ELEVATION

 
 

Scale 1:200

BUILDING J

REAS

‘SITE AREA = 1721?

  

CARPARKING
REQUIRED CARS = 24 (150m)
PROVIDED CARS = 24

LANDSCAPING
REQUIRED 1x72 1
PROVIDED 14.9% = 257 tr?

 

 

RACKED ENDWALL — meme

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECTION K-K

Scale 1:200

 

 

CAlcuie

architects
MAROOCHYDORE BUSINESS. PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYDORE = QId 4559

PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC —Q/d 4558
PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5479 2380

ABN 23423.917 724
EMAIL: [email protected]
>
project
Bet PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK

 

for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S & L DEVELOPMENTS

at
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE

grawing

BUILDING J - DRAWINGS

date AUG 07 drawn CD scale 13:200

sawing nc. 07042 SDL2 cevison B

{
Copeman document amare be BxvNe
sromany of SPROUT ARCHITEGTS PTY LTD.
d ABN 21 179 917 724

Contractors are 20 vecty al canenasona and levels on

X site rar to enmmancng Ragan a GACrepArenE ©
\ (a Arcniect Usa Rgued crnentione m preference
‘eacalee

t

Page 22

REV DESCRIPTION DRAWN DATE
pt
A RESPONSE TO COUNCIL o 180106

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
BUILDING F |

    

BOUNDARY

BUILDING J | BUILDING |
N

BUILDING H | BUILDING G

 

| ‘ben WDE FIRE BUFFER:
ROCOMEUSTRLE MATERALS
NO URDSEAPNO

 

RENE
ROAD

   

            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

wencreue sssagon_] sme!
GREGG Vom DETALS LINE (DOTTED) UNE (DOTTED) UNE (DOTTED) |
C. SITE SECTION 1
Scale 1:250
i BUILDING K BUILDING A BUILDING B — i
NO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS-
a Vv
yn
Lc Tobead
UU ie ob Th
. eee pe MeL LL ee ee ee ee rr Maen fone ee =
a a 4 Y
| , WATURA GROUND __|
ween

 

— SITE SECTION 2
Scale 1:250
| BUILDING J BUILDING A 7
] |
| |

+ rocoesst ae waters:
NOLANDSCAPNG

 

     

   

Re et ee oe ey

vee Ne cone N 4 ei

Tot meee ee eee ee AM wins, “=

 

{ NATURAL GROUND KOADLEVELS TORMAON
[UME DOTTED (GREGG VOM DETARS,

 

BUILDING B

 

sewoc rac eurrer
<1 — roconeust ef waters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

| RoUNoaRAPAG ee ay r
| wd
r © | Y
1 Mee a
— — .
architects
' Oe BUSINESS PARK
6/12 NORVAL CRT MAROOCHYOORE Id 4558
BUILDING G BUILDING D i PO BOX 6232 MAROOCHYDORE BC aa 4558
| j PH : 07 5443 5028 FAX:07 5479 2380
I ABN 23.123 917 724
° 7 re \ EMAIL: admin@}sproutarch.com au
CLOLT YE -—————_-- a*nv—\roonooTt
1} SEE waa
th = iat CER ia PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK
fn t none a a a Settee eos eb ee Re bs wore tor
i cA . J ' S & L DEVELOPMENTS
! ineworttoy Geecovouoerad iam tne Dorn) !
“\ SITE SECTION 5 . x
Scale 1-250 LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD
NOOSAVILLE
el BUILDING F — BUILDING E zl
3 i '
* 1 drawing
Y \ SITE SECTIONS
1
<4 felon reas date AUGO7 = drown CD scale 1:250

HO LANDSCAPING

| drowing. 0.07041 SD13 vision A
4 ’
1 fo Cooma of wes docienart mane fo exchANe
ooay Seat AACATEETS PTY LTO
! ABN 25173917 TH

Scale 1250 YS “eee

   

N:obait7041 Poomed Commerc! Lot 3 it BLE DevelopmentiDraminga\AreniCAD\adehO7041 GITE PLAR pin - 402 PM. 170172008

Page 23

 

 

 

 

EASEMENT A TO BE EXTINGUISHEO AFTER
CONNECTION OF NEW POWER TO
SEWERAGE PUMP STATION. DEVELOPER
TO ARRANGE ALL NECESSARY CONSENTS
{NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL AND ENERGEX).
+PREPARATION OF LEGEAL DOCUMENTATION
ANS LODGEMENT AT TITLES OFFICE. ALL
COSTS TO BE MET BY THE DEVELOPER,

 

 

 

 

 

MANHOLE MUST BE RETAINED
AS 4S.

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

7 a“
CONSTRUCT NEW MANHOLE OVER
EXISTING LINE. WORK BY
APPROVED CONTRACTOR. .

  

  

LOT.5.-

0S2- OPEN SPACE ~
{ENVIRONMENTAL AREA)

                   
           

 

 

     

  

Hi <2
r= os " JG,
SEE ULE - 7 Ba RN AE = Seog:
ae, nH - DRAINAGE AREA} Yo, TT RVTRRMAS SES <=
. me MH NV 11701703 77) a a ~
NS . oe s 150 HCB MH stub gg ‘APPROVED CONTRACTOR TO CAP
N : 2-—ENERGEX EARTHWORKS... a ~ internal drop} iy Nee 2, AND SEAL EXISTING 300mm DIA
A\ ee SL 3.20 Pati ‘Saf sewer EXTERNAL TO NEW MANHOLE

 

IL 0.40

  
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NV11738701 ~
SL4.30.

MH NV 11/38/01
2x150 HCB MH stubs
Sl 4.575
iL 0.800

 

 

 

 

 

 

       
                        

  

  
 

BASE TO SUIT.

/ '

&

Pr
a
i
=
lee
im
1S
1a
I

 

roy ee
EXISTING SEWER TO BE REMOVED
ANO RECONSTRUCTED AS DETAILED.

 

MEK NV 11701704
2x150 HCB MH st
\ SL 3.95
+ IL 0.40

 

ubs

 

APPROVED CONTRACTOR TO CAP AND SEAL
EXISTING 300mm DIA SEWER EXTERNAL TO

  

 

 

 

  

  
              

   

  

       

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

™ ~ MANHOLE AND REBENCH BASE TO SUIT.
- . Ree ee an KE Hn ge 5  - - - - - = - GR KG YAK ---- ----- i —T
= oe
<TS Lt
225BVC tts —y 50.250 2258vC } 00.26 90.65, 138 ve ne 2 NV 11/01/05
J eG sits = se ¢ |, Sse eg SS ee he
Sy NV I01709 NV11017084X NV 11701707 NV 1701706, 9 % his LEGEND
“es SL4.85 —_ “2 \ fffer REFER DWG M3048/C57 SITE LAYOUT
% foe FOR ND ANI ENERAL SEWER NOTESS
APPROVED CONTRACTOR TO CORE ORILL NEW CONNECTION INTO 4 EXISTING BULK SEWER DISPOSAL SYSTEM AT EXISTING SEWER INSIDE EXISTING BOUNDARY \2 LEGEND AND G 907
EXISTING MANHOLE AND CAP EXISTING 225mm DIA SEWER EXISTING RENE STREET PROPERTY BOUNDARY (78-80 RENE ST) TO BE MODIFIED BY NOOSA S
EXTERNAL TO MANHOLE AND REBENCH BASE 70 THE TO 8E RELOCATED TO NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL SHIRE COUNCIL AND CONVERTED TQ INTERNAL \ SEWE RAG E LAYOUT PLAN
306 ( SATISFACTION OF NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL WATER & SEWERAGE SATISFACTION AT DEVELOPER'S COST. HOUSE DRAINAGE/PRIVATE SEWER. ALL \e
SP 104321 @ CAPITAL WORKS MANAGER, MIKE FROUDE, ph 5449 S288. ° ws BY NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL AT COUNCIL \3 1 5 * 6 2 Ss ite
EXISTING 225mm DIA SEWER ACROSS RENE STREET IS 70 BE NOTE: EXISTING SYSTEM MUST BE MAINTAINE| ST. \
CAPPED AT THE MOST UPSTREAM END AND ABANDONED. UNTIL_NEW SYSTEM (5 OPERATIONAL. \. SCALE 1500 AT At
Se! \
NOTES: TITLE: PROJECT: DAE MARCH 2007 | scale AS SHOWN
Lies 1 the property of the engaeer, ond any cet | ZAN BARLOW GREGG 322>a78_| SEWERAGE LAYOUT PLAN LOT RECONFIGURATION at ves ant] ween
vane eben geonee sn ogee | | LEB san 7 93 Aon wD SHEET 3 OF & LOT 1 SP 182880 ee se tn ee
wi i r. Z
» [rome scusens nerve [at irons wes rcv eceeseme| | [Ge gy” > Base ms rams Us EENIE CREEK ROAD ea cris #1990
( | FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE - MINOR BDY CHANGES 18/30/47 | KT 9. Box 268. - _ .|
¢ |Fo constaucri issu = swwoR soy cwances | | mere iar 2. Faqared aensions rake precedeace over scale. aera Pa Ben coat coast: | sssoatto conan NOOSAVILLE PROJECT -SUBSET-SHEET-REVISION
1 | Seine Oe womes Meewobae Revisions 3ersgcanl nr 3. Weny el carson on sie Par KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES M3048 - C60 D
No. Amendment Date |6y|No. Amendment Date |By teaaPratiergegg.ct Ph: {07} 5443 2864 Fax: (07) $443 7166 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 24

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

RENE STREET

 

 

 

: »

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPOSED LOCATION OF
32kL DETENTION TANKS

INDICATES PROPOSED
BIORETENTION AREAS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

minim
l PIE

\4 PROPOSED LOCATION OF|
32k RAINWATER t

 

 

 

 

HARVESTING TANKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OT 3

 

 

PROPOSED LOCATIO!
32kL DETENTION (TANKS,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I< proposed LOCATION OF
32kL DETENTION TANKS

 

 

 

HARVESTING TANKS

t— | —“=— PROPOSED LOCATION OF
___ 32kL_ RAINWATER

 

 

 

 

SITE DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1 ON SP182880 € 5 uw B&B mw Boe
PARISH OF TEWANTIN

COUNTY OF MARCH SCALE, 1500 @ At

EEA EEE OOO EEE XE EEE EEE EE:

 

OK KE KEELES KEEX EE EEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

REXEEEE

 

 

 

 

NOTATION
—

===

INDICATES STORMWATER
FLOW DIRECTION

INDICATES PROPOSED

BIORETENTION AREAS

LOT 3 STORMWATER

 

FLOW DIRECTION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. Amendment Date |By|No

Amendment

 

Date

 

By

 

NOTES:

A. This 1s the property of the engneer, and may noi
be used. coped, of reproduces wholly. of in part
without the express permission of the engneer.

 

 

Iniringesent m ony way may result n legat actor.

dumensions take precedence over scaled.

 

all dimensions on site.

 

 

B
GL
ry

BARLOW GREGG 3722 4

 

‘ABM T7114 957 363 ACH 116 957 345

TITLE:
LOT 3 STORMWATER

FLOW DIRECTION

SCALE AS SHOWN

 

 

 

 

SUNSHINE COAST: Feat
Vi81 Brabene Reco Prase
7.0. Gas 700,

Noslealape GLB. 2557
See O6E

 

 

ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS

KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES

Ph: (07) S463 2846 Fax: (07} $643 716

 

apeaaven

APE

 

PROJECT-SUBSET-SHEET-RE VISION

 

 

 

PROJECT: DATE DECEMBER 2007
RETAIL BUSINESS SHOWROOM & cso a
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OFFICE { o~ NRT
iat 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD recat
INOOSAVILLE

M3048 -

SK05

 

 

Page 25

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S|_Lots
2 2
= [sin SURFACE [NATURAL SURFACE ~
DATUM 2.00 _ 1
CROSS SECTION Ga)
RENE ST__| >> = |_LoT s
5 Eston SURFACE punes SURFACE 5
Le - ee N\ _
DATUM 2.00 _—
CROSS SECTION Gas)
EXIST LOT [>
° CUL-DE-SAC Bl_10T $
gS [DESIGN SURFACE —_ SURFACE a
aA
DATUM 2.00
CROSS SECTION @)
> .
3a
EXIST LOT | =
5 CUL-DE-SAC | Lors
ps SURFACE [ NATURAL SURFACE =
DATUM 2.00
CROSS SECTION >
Exist LOT |S as}
5 CUL-DE-SAC [lot 5
Ss esis SURFACE tr WATURAL SURFACE a
ko f S| NOTE
—_—_ — —— * MAXIMUM BATTER SLOPES 1 in &
— ° RETAINING WALLS AS LOCATED ON
DATUM 2.00 DWG M3048-SK03
. CROSS SECTION @)
3 \SK03/
-EXIST LOT | 8
8 [DESIGN SURFACE NATURAL SURFACE mpl
[— : < ;
— — — -~ — a a
DATUM 2.00
CROSS SECTION &
Wonaontl seate 0 \seay LOT 3 CROSS SECTIONS
Vertical scale 1:100
NOTES: TITLE: PROJECT: cate OECEMBER 2007 | scat AS SHOWN
{Ths 5 the property of the engneer, and aay cet | ESSN BARLOW GREGG essa | LOT 3 PRELIMINARY LEVELS JRETAIL BUSINESS SHOWROOM &{ usin dae | sePnove0
(ees. ode erect we pert B ABM T7 116 $57 363. ACH 116 857 363 CROSS SECTIONS A TO F COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OFFICE | NRT
wirgeen! ey voy oy tes lel . G oD SUNSHOVE COAST: FRASER COAST: lat 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD ECKEO arta
| 2 Figured dimensions take precedence over scaled. ASSDCATED CONSTANTS NOOSAVILLE PROJECT -SUBSE T-SHEET-REVISION
1 Yendy ll doenons ona cy KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES KOb
No. Amendment Oate |By|No. Amendment Oate |By Teteaptoyeeonpensanns Ph: (07) S643 2864 Fax: {07 5463 7146 M3048 ~ S 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 26

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

LOT 5

Ga Gi Ga Gay

 

x

 

 

 

)

Mbt titi titi di Libbbbe

Lith
LJ

 

 

 

\
HHH

%

 

FFL 4.75

 

 

 

 

 

FFL 4.70

FFL 5.00
FFL 4.95 |

 

 

 

 

»

 

 

 

 

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WET

LL-H

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TTTTPT TTT

 

Mee
—>

 

 

UIT =
LLL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TTT is TTL

 

 

 

TTTTTITITWTTTle

 

SKO4

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

§)|iels fll i Lf SK04
LL HER an 3 E
o po —
FFL 5.20 -— 7 7 | | [—— 3 E_
[— .
FFL S.25 [ FFL 5.40 ‘a | E
— 5.45 E
Ls -— LE
a eet eet E-
SEES sooo Romooorr C

 

 

SITE DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1 ON SP182880
PARISH OF TEWANTIN
COUNTY OF MARCH

 

so * 6 WH te
et

SCALE: £500 @ Al

Sw

 

 

mS

 

MS

=)

 

MS

 

 

 

 

 

EXISTING LOT 279

LOT 3 PRELIMINARY LEVELS

 

 

 

 

No Amendment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

  

PROJECT:

 

 

 

NOTES TITLE:
1 tes the oropety of the anges, sod woy cor | EN BARLOW GREGG 34 75<-A_|LOT 3 PRELIMINARY LEVELS
roe ty ont | UR crane ones
y may cesull w legel ccton. SG SUNSHAE COAST: FASE
¢ precedence over scaled. 0. bos CORAL TSR TED CONSULTANTS
a C7 Reuse meets KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES
eeteeg etry cen te Proven us wt __| Ph: (07) 5463 2844 Fox: (07) S463 7146

 
 

INGOSAVILLE

 

 

NOTATION

KKK KK RX XR INDICATES EXTENT OF

Datt OECEMBER 2007

 

RETAIL BUSINESS SHOWROOM &|
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OFFICE
at 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD

 

 

 

 

PROJECT-SUBSE T~SHEET-REVISION

M3048 -SK03

 

 

 

Page 27

 

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
PLAN

PART B
STORMWATER QUALITY

 

PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD,

NOOSAVILLE

for
KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES

M3048
December 2007

BARLOWGREGG VENA.

Page 28

STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  

 

1.0 INCFOGCUCTION..............:ccsscesscssscesscesssccssscssssseesscessseressoseesssssseseseceececeeecescneeeeseneee 3

2.0 Pollutant Export Modelling..............ssssssscccssssscsssscssssssssssessesstsessseesecsnsarees 4
2.1 — Water Quality Objectives oo... cecccccceccecseeseeceeseestsenscnecseesenecsesseesenees 4
2.2 -— Treatment Nodes............ wd
2.3 — Rainfall Data................. wd
2.4 — Assessment of Results. a)

4.0 CONCIUSION ........cccsssccsscsesecsssessesssssscssccrcesssccsccsecsenscessccssccsesseosesocoesecsenecesease 6

APPENDIX A.............00e008 Proposed Development Layout

APPENDIX B...........-0ceeeeee MUSIC Output

APPENDIX C..........0seeeeeeee Preliminary Drainage Details

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048

DECEMBER 2007

Page 29

STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 3

 

1.0 Introduction

Part B of this Stormwater Management Plan aims to outline stormwater quality objectives and
how they will be achieved for the proposed industrial and education development at Lot 4
Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville.
The specific objectives of Part B are as follows:

+ Determine post-development water quality;

+ Identify relevant water quality objectives (WQO's);

« Outline how the WQO's will be achieved.

The Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation (MUSIC) has been utilised
to model predicted pollutant export loads and concentrations, and assess the suitability of a

range of treatment devices.

The site of the proposed development is approximately 2.08 Ha in area and is currently vacant.
The site slopes at an approximate gradient of 1% generally towards the east of the site, into
OS4, and eventually into Eenie Creek. OS4 is designated as Open Space (Environmental
Drainage) under the Noosa Plan and as such no development works may be carried out in this

area. The site has no upstream catchment.

The proposed development involves the construction of several industrial tenancies and an
education facility, with both being serviced by a central access road. Access to the site will be
provided from the proposed Rene Street extension that skirts the north of the site. The
proposed lawful point of discharge for the site is the north eastern corner of the lot where

runoff will be discharged into OS4.

The proposed development layout is attached in appendix A.

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 30

STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

 

2.0 Pollutant Export Modelling

As previously mentioned the MUSIC modelling software was utilised to predict performance

characteristics of the proposed water treatment train. Modelling parameters were set up in

accordance with Brisbane City Council's recommendations as specified in “Guidelines for
Export Pollutant Modelling in Brisbane Version 7” (October 2003), and Gold Coast City
Council’s “MUSIC Modelling Guidelines” (2006). The node layout of the music model is

provided in appendix B.

2.1 — Water Quality Objectives

This model uses the water quality objectives set out by Noosa Shire Council. A

summary of the key indicator standards is set out below in table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Noosa Shire Council Water Quality Objectives

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicator % Reduction Value
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 90 15 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (TP) 70 0.05 mg/L
Total Nitrogen (TN) 50 0.5 mg/L

 

 

 

2.2 — Treatment Nodes

The recommended BCC values for commercial source nodes have been used in

MUSIC to generate predicted pollutant loads from the site. The following devices have

been used in the treatment train to reduce these pollutant loads to an acceptable level.

+ Gross Pollutant Trap — The model has used a GPT at the downstream end of

drainage systems prior to discharge. This GPT was modelled to remove 90% of

gross pollutants for up to a Q3 month ARI storm. The exact location of this GPT's

will be detailed on future operational works drawings.

+ Bio-Retention Areas ~ These areas will be placed at the edges of carparks around

the site, and adjacent to the eastern boundary. These areas will have an extended

detention depth of 0.15m with a combined storage surface area of 3 10m’. The filter

material will consist of a 0.4m deep sandy loam layer overlying a 0.1m deep

drainage layer. The total area of bio-retention is to be 310 m’. Perforated pipes in

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM

M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 31

STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 5

 

the bottom layer will carry flow to the outlet of the bio-retention areas. The

location of these bio-retention areas is shown in appendix B.

- Rainwater Tanks — These tanks will be positioned the proposed carparks. Runoff
will be collected from the roof of the development at a rate of 151/m? of roof. This
results in a total volume of rainwater storage of approximately 113kL. Water

collected will be used for irrigation or other external uses

2.3 — Rainfall Data

Rainfall data for the site was chosen to give the best representation of actual conditions
to be expected. The meteorological data selected in the MUSIC program was the
Cooroy 30/11/1980 — 31/05/1990 data provided by the Bureau of Meteorology, using
a 6 minute time step. This period of data was used as requested by Noosa Shire

Council.

2.4 — Assessment of Results

The specified water quality objectives have been met on the subject site for total
suspended solid (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations
through the use of a gross pollutant trap, rainwater tanks, and bio-retention areas.

Appendix B contains the following MUSIC output:

« Flow based sub-sample daily mean cumulative frequency graphs,

« Treatment train effectiveness for the system,

« Node Layout

Table 2.3 below indicates the predicted export pollutant concentrations calculated by

MUSIC;

Table 2.3: Predicted Post-Development Treated Water Quality

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicator % Reduction Predicted Value
Tota! Suspended Solids (TSS) 98.6 0.201 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (TP) 78.5 0.0105 mg/L
Total Nitrogen (TN) 50.0 0.129 mg/L
BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048

DECEMBER 2007

Page 32

STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 6

 

4.0 Conclusion

Part B of this stormwater management plan has outlined the stormwater quality objectives for
this development and how these will be achieved. Predictions from the MUSIC software have
been used to measure the performance of the proposed stormwater treatment train. Modelling
shows that Noosa Shire Council requirements can be met for total suspended solids, total

phosphorus, and total nitrogen concentrations.

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 33

APPENDIX A
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT

Page 34

Page 35

APPENDIX B
MUSIC OUTPUT

Page 36

MUSIC Model Layout

S
Ss Other

Roof NY,

Rainwater _

Bio-Retentiot

GPT 1

Receiving Node

Page 37

Receiving Node 19/12/2007 10:13:36

Treatment Train Effectiveness

Flow (MLiyr) TSS (kg/yr) TP (kg/yr) TN (kg/yr) Gross Pollutants (kg/yr)
sources 32.5 7.06E3 13.8 67.4 749
tesidual Load 27.9 401 2.98 33,7 0.00

4 Reduction 14.1 98.6 78.5 50.0 100.0

Page 38

music dec - Receiving Node
Total Suspended Solids
contains all data

 

r
1

' 1 1 ! t ' ' 1 1
i

  
 

— Concentration In

Page 39

music dec - Receiving Node
Total Phosphorus
contains all data

 

— Concentration In

 

Page 40

music dec - Receiving Node
Total Nitrogen
contains all data

 

 

100-4
Fae fee oe 2 eee ee Saget cb ee et

— Concentration In

Page 41

APPENDIX C
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE DETAILS

Page 42

 

 

 

1 PROPOSED LOCATION OF
32k. DETENTION TANKS.

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

RENE STREET

PS PROPOSED LOCATION OF
32KL DETENTION TANKS

 

Yt PROPOSED LOCATION OF}
+ | 32kL, RAINWATER
* THARVESTING TANKS

J PROPOSED LOCATION OF
32kL RAINWATER
HARVESTING TANKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

NOTATION

BOLATES STOPHWATER
~_ FLOW ORECTION

(NOK ATES PROPOSED

= BIGRETENTION AREAS

     

open em LOT 3 STORMWATER

Pi 10} WN =

COUNTY OF MARCH SAE ISI 2 41 FLOW DIRECTION

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

TLE PROKECT mr DECEMBER 7UBT | wee AS SHOWN
LOT 3 STORMWATER RETAIL BUSINESS SHOWROOM &[ as Pe | erro,
: FLOW DIRECTION OMMERCIAL BUSINESS OFFICE [> pat
' ' + 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD Ser rere
Kear NOOSAVILLE PROJECT-SUBSE1-SHEET-REVISION
i ‘aman Spaeth ia Lictr nanan a ‘ M3048 - SKOS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 43

I

—
— TRAFFIC IMPACT
a= ASSESSMENT
ft
mS PROPOSED BUSINESS PARK,
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD,
NOOSAVILLE
~ QUEENSLAND

Ie

A

I

=
—
j

Hl

yO
a

REPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST
FROM NOOSA COUNCIL

I:

January 2008

i

_

Job No: QC070576
Report No: 4686-1

Prepared For: S & L Developments Pty Ltd

 

Page 44

 

DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET

 

BURCHILL VDM PTY LIMITED
Evandale Place

142 Bundall Road

SURFERS PARADISE QLD 4217

Telephone: +61 7 5574 0511
Fax: +61 7 5574 0011
Email: [email protected]

Job No. QC070535

Report No. 4686-1

Original Date of Issue 10" January 2008

Project Leader Dale Kleimeyer

 

REPORT DETAILS

 

Title: Traffic Impact Assessment

Proposed Business Park

Lot 3 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville, Queensland
Response to Information Request from Noosa Council

 

Author(s): Aftab Ahmed Abro — Traffic Engineer
Client: S & L Developments Pty Ltd

Client Contact:

Client Reference:

 

 

Synopsis: The report analyses the traffic impact of the proposed business park
development on the surrounding road network and identifies any
road/intersection upgrades that may be required as a result of the

development.

 

REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVISION DATE CHECKED BY ISSUED BY DISTRIBUTION - NO. OF COPIES
NUMBER Client Other BP
4686-0 DTK
4686-1 OTK
4686-1

January 2008

ven BURCHILL VDM

 

Page 45

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction
2.0 Existing Conditions

2.1 Subject Site cece erre reer rerseeeeeceeeteeersieesneeenessnetenteetneesnney

3.0 Proposed Development

3.1 COMPOSITION... cc cececet cnc rete ene cnee teat eneeesaeersestsescaeecieeensasesesneesnaesennees
3.2 Vehicular ACCESS 0.0.0.0... iccece ct eset eeeeeeeter eee te eter erin ieetneeernenieneene
3.3 Traffic Generation... ccccccccccceesenseeeeseesseeeeecceceeseeeeesensentneeeseseenssaaeeteess

3.4 Trip Distribution & ASSIQMMENt 0.0.0... ccc tet etter rteeeere terse ree ceeetieeetaeens

4.0 Traffic Impact

4.1 Intersection Operations 0.0... eee ee reer cere e rere eerrneeseeneessenieeeciaeeeenies

5.0 Response to Information Request

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1 — Composition of Proposed Business Park

Table 3.2 — Trip Generation Rates

Table 3.3 - Trip Generation

Table 4.1 — Result Summaries for the Loop Road / Connector Road Roundabout

Table 4.2 — Key Performance Indicators: Loop Road / E5 & B3 Access Roundabout

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 — Site Location

Figure 2.1 — Site Locality Plan

Figure 3.1 — Estimated Evening Peak Traffic Demands on Loop Road
Figure 4.1 — Proposed Loop Road / Connector Road Roundabout
Figure 4.2 — Proposed Loop Road / E5 & B3 Access Roundabout

APPENDICIES

Appendix A — Site Layout
Appendix B — Sidra Summaries

10
41

oo Oo fh W

 

Jenvaty 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 46

 

1.0

INTRODUCTION

Burchill VDM Pty Ltd has been commissioned by S & L Developments Pty Ltd to
conduct a Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) of a proposed Business Park on the
southern side of Eenie Creek Road in Noosaville. The site is located in the area
identified as the ‘Shire Business Centre’ (SBC) in the Noosa Plan, as shown in
Figure 1.1.

Se
W
» Road

 

    
    

NOOSA
JUNCTION

  

 
  

sii ose d

Cantre

  

 

 

 

Figure 1.1 — Site Location

This report has been undertaken in response to an information request from
Noosa Council in relation to the traffic impacts on the external state controlled
road network and internal car park layout. The Information Request from the
Council was sent to S & L Developments Pty Ltd dated on 23" October 2007.

This Traffic Impact Assessment assesses the traffic requirements and implications
of the proposed development. The report also considers the potential traffic
generation of the proposed development and examines the adequacy of the
internal site layout.

 

4686-1

January 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 47

 

2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

2.1 SUBJECT SITE

The subject site for this assessment is proposed Lot 3. In the SBC Masterplan, the
subject site was designated for ‘Employment (Environmental R&D Business &
Offices). The relative location of the site, within the SBC is provided in Figure 2.1,
and is labelled as E3.

 

<p *
OSES ae, gee —

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  

Pete
ten EGENG

BY @S¥is5
{Rend Conta oat Cavrers}

PBLSNESS
{Car Aurting & dtton}

SUS NOSS.
{Svewrsers, OfFee & Cnsenrs!
i

Event ee

 

(Temcocia & Eneksemente|

Guster & Cii.cee]
evFuo“wEnT
(frecemeuol iat
Beers & ces,
EUPLOWMENI

EVPLOWMENT
(Pecatzy & Minrenn)
CA eee

(recadey & Sinerees)
TuPLoMt 7

(Pein FFtea & frorwt)

CvFLomenz
Ey (Barer & en}

| Joms cers sare
(Evearmesia’)

} Jone cece space

b (Emeuemevoi]

a
(CSS CREW SPACE
[Preamvalion af Vint ‘secnty)
Sa CPEN Space
(Esseormanic) Crane)
GBS CORN SHALE

Preservation st Vtual Aowsly]|

O96 WE SPACE,
Peesaareetion at Yituct Arse)

 

OST LOEW SPACE
(E-veremtial Grerage)

RRS spar
Paxson Suseeet)

SPLSRATION MEE DST
(Mei reereatses

treo esd

open aporet

 

j——.—— — — REYELE ATH
ELICNG, PASH

 

 

RAE £200 OD an ip eee 1
jon 2003 fff” Caetn Fe | i

& = ~~ -
Too s2 SUN [

NOOSA SHIRE BUSINESS CENTRE

MASTER PLAN - STAGE 2 - MP2 PLAN

Figure 2.1 — Site Locality Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

senvaty 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 48

 

3.0

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

3.1 COMPOSITION

The proposed development mainly comprises of light industry land use. An
education training centre with an assumed capacity of 35 students, together with
an ancillary (conference facility and gymnasium) have also been proposed as part
of the development. The uses and the scales of the proposed development are
detailed have been shown in the Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 — Composition of Proposed Business Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S.No Land Use STi Quantum
1 Gymnasium 100m? GFA 0.72
2 Conference / Meeting Room 100m? GFA 0.62
3 Education Training Centre : 100m? GEA 2.79
4 Buitding A (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 9.50
5 Building B (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 8.00
6 Building C (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 9.50
7 Building D (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 8.00
8 Building E (Light industry) 100m? GFA 41.97
9g Building F (Light Industry) 100m? GEA 11.97
10 Building G (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 8.00
11 Building H (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 9.50
12 Building 1 (Light Industry) 100m? GFA 8.00
13 Building J (Light Industry) 100m? GEA 10.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

A layout of the proposed development is provided in Appendix A.

3.2 VEHICULAR ACCESS

The proposed development would gain access on Rene Street and link to the
Loop Road at the north of the subject site.

3.3. TRAFFIC GENERATION

In order to establish the traffic volume that would result from the proposed
development, a range of sources were consulted.

Trip generation rates for the proposed development were referenced from the
DMR Road Planning & Design Manual (RP&DM), Chapter 3, and the RTA Guide
to Traffic Generating Developments (GTGD) Chapter 3. The adopted rates are
summarised in Table 3.2.

It is noted that conference / meeting facility would only be used occasionally and
would not generate trips during the peak hours as other land uses of the proposed
development. It is also noted that the gymnasium will only be opened to site users

 

4686-1

January 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 49

 

and therefore the trips from the conference / meeting facility and gymnasium have
not been considered in the assessment.

Table 3.2 — Trip Generation Rates

Student 0.2 02
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 09
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
1001? GFA 0.72 0.9
100m? GFA 0.72 0.9
100n? GFA 0.72 0.9

1
2
3
4
5
6
3
8
9

SI[[[TIO[AMIOO [MD
O[OloOlo lo lolofealolof:

=j4
aris

 

The resultant trips generated by the proposed development have been shown in
the Table 3.3.

Table 3.3 — Trip Generation

2 9 54
FE 2 9 54

H 1 Z

1 8 6 4 7 36 72
6 2 8 9 47 95

otal 15 75 18 4 92 427 854

Note: - it has been assumed that 8% of the daily traffic would be trip generation
rate for morning peak hour

 

For Education Training Centre and light industry land uses, the typical morning
peak hour arrival and departure ratio is 80% and 20%. !n the evening peak hour
the ratio is 20% arrival and 80% departure. A departure and arrival ratio of
50%:50% has been adopted for day trip.

The subject site was previously designated for employment use. The Burchill VDM
Report 4622-2 "Response to Information Request Noosa Corporate Offices — Lot
2, Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville, Queensland (September 2007)” has adopted a
traffic generation rate of 2 trips/100 m? for the previous use. On this basis 228
trips would have been generated during the evening peak hour. However, only 92
trips will be generated during evening peak hour based on the present use for the
proposed development, which is 136 trips less than the previously calculation.

3.4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT

 

4686-1

January 2008 VnmM BURCHILL VDM

Page 50

 

In order to establish the traffic distribution for the proposed development, it was
assumed that 80% of the development trips would generate along Loop Road.
The Loop Road is accessed from Eenie Creek Road via a short ‘Connector Road’,
as shown in Figure 2.1. The intersections of Eenie Creek Road / the Connector
Road, and the Loop Road / the Connector Road are both roundabouts.

15% of the development would travel along Rene Street to the west and would get
onto Eumundi Street at Eumundi Street / Rene Street Roundabout.

Traffic volumes for all the intersections of ‘Shire Business Centre’ have been
adopted from the Burchill VDM Report 4622-2 "Response to Information Request
Noosa Corporate Offices — Lot 2, Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville, Queensland
(September 2007)”. The traffic volumes adopted in that report for the proposed
Business Park have been replaced by the trips calculated in Table 3.3 of this
report and the relevant changes have been made on all the intersections.

As the ‘Shire Business Centre’ and proposed Business Park generate more trips
during the evening peak period, the weekday evening peak has been the focus for
the subsequent assessment. The traffic demands during the evening peak at
intersections are illustrated in Figure 3.1.

 

4686-1

January 2008

ven BURCHILL VDM

Page 51

 

 

Eenie Creek Rd

 

c

1,053

229 __f

762

[ Et Access }—™ r

694

[ Connector Road

458

|

150

64

113

>
t

62

319 26

29 290

a
v4

 

   

68

a

 

Loop Road

 

Fi

ure 3.1 — Estimated Evening Peak Traffic Demands on Loop Road

 

 

4686-1
January 2008

ven BURCHILL VDM

 

Page 52

 

4.0

TRAFFIC IMPACT

4.1. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS

The capacity assessment of intersections was carried out using the SIDRA
INTERSECTION 3.1 traffic modelling software. This is an advanced micro-
analytical traffic evaluation tool that evaluates the capacity of the intersections. It
provides thorough operational analysis of the intersections.

(i) Connector Road / Loop Road Roundabout
For the purpose of capacity analysis the roundabout was designed with 2

circulating lanes having width of 10m total and a central island with diameter of
15m. The layout of the roundabout has been illustrated in the Figure 4.1.

 

Connector Road (N)

 

Loop Road (E)

 

 

 

 

Figure 4.1 — Proposed Loop Road / Connector Road Roundabout

 

When considering roundabouts, a Degree of Saturation (DOS), (which is the ratio
of flow to capacity) greater than 85% is considered over capacity. Above this
value, performance deteriorates quickly and operation becomes poor.

The analysis shows that the roundabout works very well as the key performance
indicators are according to DMR standards. The maximum queue forming on the
Southern Loop Road Approach is 25m and would not affect the operation of Loop
Road / E5 & B3 Access Roundabout because two roundabouts are about 64m
apart from centre to centre. The maximum queue forming on the Connector Road
Approach is 19m and would not affect the operation of Roundabout on Eenie
Creek Road because this roundabout is a distance of 65m from Eenie Creek
Road.

 

4686-1

January 2008 Vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 53

10

 

The key performance indicators have been shown in the Table 4.1.

Table 4,1 — Result Summaries for the Loop Road / Connector Road Roundabout

  

Delay Queue
Cs) (dead)

   

1 Peak i Approach / Movement DOS

  
 

Loop Road (E)
P.M Fconnector Road (N)
Loop Road (SVVv)

  
 
     

The roundabout was also analysed with a single lane at the southern Loop Road
approach but the roundabout failed in its operational capacity because the traffic
demand at this approach is high and requires two lanes. Hence two circulating
lanes are recommended with two approach lanes and two receiving lanes.

(ii) Loop Road /E5 & B3 Access Roundabout
For the purpose of capacity analysis the roundabout was designed with 1

circulating lane having width of 7m and central island with diameter of 10m. The
layout of the roundabout has been illustrated in the Figure 4.2.

 

Loop Road (N)

   

 

 

 

——

B3 Access (E)

(MW) sse00y €8 8 3
|
“-——

\

|

/

 

 

Loop Road (S)

 

Figure 4.2 — Proposed Loop Road / E5 & B3 Access Roundabout

 

The analysis shows that the roundabout works very well as the key performance
indicators are according to DMR standards. The maximum queue at the Southern

 

2686-1 vem BURCHILL VDM

January 2008

Page 54

11

 

Loop Road Approach intersection is 62m. This queue would not affect the
operation of Loop Road / E4 Access intersection as it is at the distance of 135m.
The maximum queue at Northern Loop Road Approach is 17m and would not
affect the operation of Loop Road / Connector Road roundabout because the two
roundabouts are about 64m apart. The key performance indicators have been
shown in the Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 — Key Performance Indicators: Loop Road / E5 & B3 Access
Roundabout

      
 

{

Del
i Peak Approach / Movement DOS aia ahahaha

(e-9) (Can)

 
 
   

Loop Road (S)
B3 Access (E)
Loop Road (N)
ES5/B3 Access (VV)

 
 
 

  
 
    

 

4686-1

January 2008

vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 55

12

 

5.0 RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST

19.1 Compliance with Part 14 Division 18 of the Planning Scheme.
Land use details for Lot 3 as follows:
° Industrial 9148 m?* useable area

This use comprises and is defined as Industria! Business Type 1 — Warehouse and
Industrial Business Type 2 — Production, Alteration, Repackaging & Repairing

e Education 270 m?*

This use is for the Noosa Community Training Centre and is defined as Education Type
3 - Adult. The 270m? of area will comprise 180m? classroom area, 30m? kitchen training
area and 60m’ of administration area.

It is note that the Education training centre would be accommodated in the building
currently shown as conference facility. A small gym area and conference facility will
remain however this is not considered a separate or additional use and does not need to
be assessed in traffic or carparking generation. The conference/gym uses will not be
open to the public and is an ancillary facility for use of the industrial tenancies on the
site.

The scheme complies with part 14 Division 18 of the scheme.

19.2 Intersection Analysis.

Please refer to Section 4 of this report for the intersection operation analyses,
which demonstrates the intersections perform satisfactorily with the proposed
development.

19.3 Carpark Compliance

Please refer to town planning report.

19.4 Carpark Numbers

Please refer to town planning report.

19.5 Blind Aisles

The layout of the proposed car park is consistent with the requirements as set out
in" Australian Standard for Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off Street Car parking
(AS2890.1)”. The carpark complies by limiting the number of circulation lanes

and aisles and the blind aisles are compliant as a turning area has been provided
thereby allowing cars to exit in a forward direction.

 

Sanuaty 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 56

13

 

19.6 Safe Access for Pedestrians and End of Trip Facilities

Pedestrian facilities can be provided safely in a north south direction with
crossings over the car park entrance areas. Pedestrian crossing across car
parking aisles is not uncommon and the volume of traffic in each side row is
expected to be very low. End of trip facilities including showers for cyclists should
be supplied according to the Australian Standards.

 

Sanvaty 2008 vem BURCHILL VDM

Page 57

14

 

APPENDIX A

SITE LAYOUT

 

4686-1
January 2008

Page 58

 

weg TODS TROLO wer

oorr ma ete Lon 2

NW1d BLIS TIVUZAO

une

 

STIIAYSOON
voy NaaND FIN|D E LOT

SANANdOTaAIG 19S
»

uVd SSANISNG AISOdOUd
atest

re
re wor ee voxh Que wna
wed Lire Fe NOY

once eure 2a Ky4 8208 Co¥8 19
ASS% PD IE AWOOMOOTUYH ZED KOR Od
BSG" HD ALOGANIOOUV 149 THABON 21/5
wind SSINISTR THOGAHOOOWH

= [851248

e

     

 
 

g

 

a nnn wouengen Are

ora wate seve
"oma 08

     

 

ZOnane JONITTING

 

 

   

 

 

QONIOTING 9 ONITIING
= row ONETIIOTT rea razawrs
oun croros! paaroeae ronson
BagvatOnvl
aonow env
" Taras SONIguNa HONIMING
burwdop ae ne xen
10 03
(Georvzzae DreanToM)
ent VAD ANAL LOL
armas va US
neal cae aaeee
« sure 40 voor TOL
® fonaN8 20 eR TOL
TaVWAS SOS Sg ONICTING HONITIING

 

 

 

        

YONIgTIN roniaina
Auntovd ©
JONSYSENOD

Page 59

15

 

APPENDIX B

SIDRA SUMMARIES

 

4686-1
January 2008

Page 60

Movement Summary Page | of 1

SIDRA >
INTERSECTION

Movement Summary

Proposed Business Park (Shire Business Centre Noosaville)

Connector Road / Loop Road Roundabout_P.M

Roundabout

Vehicle Movements

 

95%

Deg of Aver Aver

 

 

 

 

Dem Flow Level of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop
Mov ID Turn %HV Satn Delay . Speed
(veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service ae Queued Rate (km/h)
Loop Road (E)
4 L 11 0.0 0.196 8.4 LOS A 8 0.53 0.68 48.3
6 R 158 0.0 0.197 13.8 LOS B 8 0.53 0.78 44.2
Approach 169 0.0 0.197 13.5 LOS B 8 0.53 0.77 44.5
Connector Road (N)
7 L 67 3.0 0.349 5.4 LOS A 19 0.07 0.45 51.8
9 R 497 3.0 0.348 10.2 LOS B 19 0.07 0.65 47.1
Approach 564 3.0 0.348 9.6 LOSA 19 0.07 0.63 47.6
Loop Road (SW)
30 L 1134 3.0 0.425 5.1 LOS A 25 0.39 0.46 50.5
32 R 11 0.0 0.423 10.8 LOS B 24 0.40 0.65 45.8
Approach 1145 3.0 0.425 5.1 LOSA 25 0.39 0.46 50.5
All Vehicles 1878 2.7 0.425 7.2 LOS A 25 0.31 0.54 49.0

 

Symbols which may appear in this table:

Following Degree of Saturation
# x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow
* x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity

Following LOS
# - Based on density for continuous movements

Following Queue
# - Density for continuous movement

+

SIDRA SOLUTIONS

Site: Connector Road / Loop Road
F:\Burchill VDM's Work Folder\- Active Jobs\QC070576 - Lot 3\Traffic\SIDRA\Roundabouts on Loop Road.aap
Processed Dec 13, 2007 02:47:34PM

A0463, Burchill VDM Pty Ltd, Large Office

Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455

Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd
id luti

about:blank 10/01/2008

Page 61

Movement Summary Page | of 2

SIDRA -_=
INTERSECTION

Movement Summary

Proposed Business Park (Shire Business Centre Noosaville)

Loop Road / E5 B3 Access Roundabout_PM

Roundabout

Vehicle Movements

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dem Flow Deg of Aver Level of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop Aver
Mov ID Turn WHY Satn Delay ‘ : Speed
{veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service ene Queued Rate (km/h)
Loop Road (S)
1 L 5 16.7 0.667 9.8 LOS A 62 0.67 0.69 46.6
2 T 821 3.0 0.698 77 LOS A 62 0.67 0.62 47.7
3 R 5 16.7 0.667 13.5 LOS B 62 0.67 0.70 43.9
Approach 833 3.2 0.698 7.7 LOS A 62 0.67 0.62 47.7
B3 Access (E)
4 L 5 16.7 0.082 75 LOS A 3 0.48 0.61 49.0
5 T 5 16.7 0.082 7.5 LOS A 3 0.48 0.61 49.0
6 R 65 3.1 0.083 13.3 LOS B 3 0.48 0.70 44.6
Approach 77 5.2 0.083 12.4 Los B 3 0.48 0.68 45.2
Loop Road (N)
7 L 27 3.6 0.315 5.4 LOS A 17 0.10 0.45 51.7
8 T 348 29 0.315 4.5 LOS A 17 0.10 0.38 52.8
9 R 119 3.4 0.315 11.3 LOS B 17 0.10 0.66 46.2
Approach 495 3.0 0.315 6.2 LOSA 17 0.10 0.45 50.9
E5 B3 Access (W)
10 L 241 2.9 0.445 13.0 LOS B 30 0.89 0.99 44.3
11 T 5 16.7 0.462 12.0 LOS B 30 0.89 0.98 45.3
12 R s 16.7 0.462 18.9 LOS B 30 0.89 0.93 40.6
Approach 253 3.6 0.446 13.1 Los B 30 0.89 0.98 44.2
All Vehicles 1658 3.3 0.698 8.3 LOSA 62 0.53 0.63 47.9

 

Symbols which may appear in this table:

Following Degree of Saturation
# x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow
* x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity

Following LOS
# - Based on density for continuous movements

Following Queue
# - Density for continuous movement

+

SIDRA SOLUTIONS

Site: Loop Road / ES & B3 Access
F:\Burchill VOM's Work Folder\- Active Jobs\QC070576 - Lot 3\Traffic\SIDRA\Roundabouts on Loop Road.aap
Processed Dec 13, 2007 02:47:26PM

A0463, Burchill VDM Pty Ltd, Large Office
Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455

about:blank 10/01/2008

Page 62

Movement Summary Page 1 of 1

SIDRA -—~=
INTERSECTION

Movement Summary

Noosa Lifestyle Showrooms

Loop Road / E4 Access Priority-Controlled Intersection
Give-way

Vehicle Movements

 

95%

Deg of Aver Aver

 

 

 

 

Dem Flow Levei of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop
Mov ID Turn %HV Satn Delay Speed
i

(veh/h) (w/c) (sec) Service ones Queued Rate (km/h)
Loop Road (S)

1 L 5 16.7 0.429 8.3 LOS A 0 0.00 0.67 49.0

2 T 820 3.0 0.432 0.0 LOS A 0 0.00 0.00 60.0

Approach 826 3.1 0.432 0.1 LOS A 0.00 0.00 59.9
Loop Road (N)

8 T 359 3.1 0.253 9.1 LOS A 34 0.90 0.00 48.0

9 R 31 3.2 0.252 17.7 LOS C 34 0.90 1.01 40.4

Approach 390 3.1 0.253 9.8 LOS A 34 0.90 0.08 47.3
E4 Access (W)

10 L 72 2.8 0.316 24.4 LOS C 10 0.82 0.99 35.9

12 R 5 16.7 0.316 24.7 Los Cc 10 0.82 0.99 35.7

Approach 77 3.9 0.315 24.4 Los c 10 0.82 0.99 35.9

Not
All Vehicles 1293 3.2 0.432 4.4 Applicable 34 0.32 0.09 53.5

 

Symbols which may appear in this table:

Following Degree of Saturation
# x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow
* x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity

Following LOS
# - Based on density for continuous movements

Following Queue
# - Density for continuous movement

+

SIDRA SOLUTIONS

Site: Loop Rd / E4 Access
F:\Burchill VDM's Work Folder\- Active Jobs\QC070576 - Lot 3\Traffic\SIORA\Roundabouts on Loop Road.aap
Processed Sep 19, 2007 07:37:29PM

A0463, Burchill VDM Pty Ltd, Large Office

Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455
Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd
www. sidrasolutions.com

about:blank 10/01/2008

Page 63

Movement Summary Page 1 of 1

SIDRA -=
INTERSECTION

Movement Summary

Noosa Lifestyle Showrooms

E3 Access/ E4 Access Priority-Controlled Intersection
Give-way

Vehicle Movements

 

og
Deg of Aver 95% Aver

 

 

 

 

Dem Flow Level of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop
Mov ID Turn %HV Satn Delay . Speed
(veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service enn Queued Rate (km/h)
E3 E4 Access (E)
5 T 73 2.8 0.096 0.7 LOS A 4 0.30 0.00 56.1
6 R 72 2.8 0.096 9.3 LOS A 4 0.30 0.66 47.5
Approach 143 2.8 0.096 5.0 LOSA 4 0.30 0.33 51.5
E4 Access (N)
7 L 167 3.0 0.179 9.4 LOS A 7 0.32 0.66 47.6
9 R 5 16.7 0.176 9.7 LOS A 7 0.32 0.77 47.4
Approach 173 3.5 0.179 9.4 LOS A 7 0.32 0.66 47.6
E3 Access (W)
10 L 5 16.7 0.091 8.3 LOS A 0 0.00 0.67 49.0
11 T 167 3.0 0.091 0.0 LOS A oO 0.00 0.00 60.0
Approach 173 3.5 0.091 0.3 LOS A 0.00 0.02 59.5
7 Not
All Vehicles 489 3.3 0.179 4.9 Applicable 7 0.20 0.34 52.5

 

Symbols which may appear in this table:

Following Degree of Saturation
# x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow
* x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity

Following LOS
# - Based on density for continuous movements

Following Queue
# ~ Density for continuous movement

+

SIDRA SOLUTIONS

Site: E3 Access / E4 Access
F:\Burchill VDM's Work Folder\- Active Jobs\QC070576 - Lot 3\Traffic\SIDRA\Roundabouts on Loop Road.aap
Processed Sep 20, 2007 09:31:28AM

A0463, Burchill VDM Pty Ltd, Large Office

Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455

Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd
id uti

about:blank 10/01/2008

Page 64

 

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
PLAN
PART A
QUANTITY

 

PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND
EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT
LOT 3 EENIE CREEK ROAD,

NOOSAVILLE

for
KEN HICKS & ASSOCIATES

M3048
December 2007

BARLOWGREGG VPM.
MPRA. "rember

Page 65

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  
 
 
 
 
  

1.0 INtrOdUCtiON ............csscssssssecsscsssorsnsssnsssserssccssssasessessesssesseassessesseansseseeseeassees 3
2.0 Existing Conditions ..........cccccceeee 3
3.0 Proposed Development................. 3
4.0 Site Stormwater Modelling.. we 4
4.1 Methodology. ..........ccccccecsseenseneeeee 4
4.2 Selection of Modelling Parameters.... 4
4.2.1 Impervious Areas.............:ceceeeee wd
4.2.2 Manning’s ‘Nn’... 5
4.2.3 Energy Loss Coefficients 0... cece csecsecseeeeeseseeseessaeseresseseeeeaees 5
4.2.4 Infiltration Characteristics 0... ce ecseeneetecseseeeeseesesesseceeseetetseraenees 5
5.0 Pre-Development Flows.......... 1 6
5.1 Rationale... 6
5.2 Result... ce 6
6.0 Post-Development Flows.. a7
6.1 Rationale... wT
B.2 RESUIRS..0.0....cccccccccceseseesceetecennenscescessececeeeeeeeaeeeseneneeeaeeneseesaeseeecaeeeseeaeeeteeens 7
7.0 CONCIUSION .......csesccsssstsccsssesesesssnssessnccsecsnssscssecsseseesessssesscrsesserennsnesessesessonsees 8
APPENDIX A,......cceeceseeeeee Proposed Development Layout
APPENDIX B........ceecceseeeee XP-STORM Pre-Development Results
APPENDIX C.,.....ceeceeeeeernes XP-STORM Post-Development Drainage Model Layout and
Results
APPENDIX D........cesreeeeeeer Preliminary Drainage Details

 

BARLOW GREGG VOM

M3048

DECEMBER 2007

Page 66

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 3

 

1.0 Introduction

The purpose of this stormwater management plan is to determine general requirements for
bulk stormwater management for the proposed industrial and education development at Lot 3

Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville.
The specific objectives of this stormwater strategy are as follows:

« Determine pre and post-development flows;

« Identify how the non-worsening of stormwater flows will be achieved;

2.0 Existing Conditions

The site of the proposed development is approximately 2.08 Ha in area and currently vacant.
The site slopes at an approximate gradient of 1% generally towards the east of the site, into
OS4, and eventually into Eenie Creek. OS4 is designated as Open Space (Environmental
Drainage) under the Noosa Plan and as such no development works may be carried out in this

area. The site has no upstream catchment.

3.0 Proposed Development

The proposed development involves the construction of several industrial tenancies and an
education facility, with both being serviced by a central access road. Access to the site will be
provided from the proposed link road that skirts the north of the site. The proposed lawful
point of discharge for the site is the north eastern corner of the lot where runoff will be

discharged into OS4.

The proposed development layout is attached in appendix A.

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 67

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 4

 

4.0 Site Stormwater Modelling

4.1 Methodology

The hydrology and hydraulics of the pre and post development scenarios were analysed using
the XP-STORM stormwater management model with storm patterns derived from Australian

Rainfall and Runoff publication and rainfall intensities derived for the Noosa area.

Due to the topography of the land and the layout of the site, it was determined that runoff from
the site will fall to the east, away from the road. Therefore the runoff will be directed to pits
located within the carpark and conveyed via an underground pipe network to the north-eastern
comer of the lot for discharge into OS4. The XP-STORM model was set up with a
conservative stormwater system design comprising of overland flow paths through carparks
and bio-retention areas collecting runoff before discharging into a swale along the eastern
boundary of the site. Details of the proposed bio-retention areas can be found in Part B of this
stormwater management plan. Roof water is to be collected in retention tanks to help attenuate

stormwater flows.

To accurately determine pre and post development flows, the Q10 and Q100 storms were
modelled. Storm durations of 10, 20, 25, 30 ,45, 60, 75, 90, 120 and 180 minutes were

investigated.

4.2 Selection of Modelling Parameters

XP-STORM modelling parameters were assessed from layout drawings, contours, QUDM
(Queensland Urban Drainage Manual) and considering the extent of proposed development

within the catchment.

4.2.1 Impervious Areas

In accordance with the current pre-developed situation, 0% of impervious ground area was
used in the pre-developed model. In the post developed model the percent of impervious
ground area was increased to 82% to represent the proposed development. This area was

measured from the site layout drawings.

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 68

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5

4.2.2 Manning’s ‘n’

Values for the dimensionless Manning’s ‘n’ coefficient for open channel and piped flows were
ig pip

assigned according to Table 4.1 in accordance with QUDM.

Table 4.1: Study Manning’s ‘n’

 

 

 

Conduit condition Manning’s ‘n’
Grassed, Landscaped Swales 0.045
Reinforced Concrete 0.014

 

 

 

 

4.2.3 Energy Loss Coefficients

Entrance and exit loss coefficients were utilised according to Table 4.2 in general accordance
with QUDM.

Table 4.2: Pipe Energy Loss Coefficients

 

 

 

Energy Loss Loss Coefficient
Entry Loss 0.5
Exit Loss 0.2

 

 

 

 

4.2.4 Infiltration Characteristics

The Horton infiltration method was adopted for the drainage study. The values used for
maximum infiltration rate, minimum infiltration rate and decay rate of infiltration were
10mm/hr, Imm/hr, and 0.0001/sec respectively for pervious areas and 1mm/hr, 1mm/hr, and

0.000 l/sec respectively for impervious areas

 

BARLOW GREGG VOM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 69

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6

 

5.0 Pre-Development Flows

5.1 Rationale

The proposed site is currently undeveloped, and therefore an impervious area of 0% was used.
As the majority of the site contains no identifiable watercourses of concentrated overland
flow, it is assumed that the pre development overland flow occurs as sheet flow. The pre-
development model was set up so as that the stormwater runoff will drain to the north-eastern

environmental drainage area of the site.

The peak flows for the pre development conditions were derived using a conservative method

by utilising only the XP-STORM model hydrologic runoff layer.

5.2 Results

The peak flows for the pre development conditions are indicated in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Pre development Peak Flows
ARI Design Storm (min) Peak Flow (m°/s)

10 25 0.811
100 25 0.120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

XP-STORM pre development model output is included in Appendix B.

 

BARLOW GREGG VOM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 70

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 7

 

6.0 Post-Development Flows

6.1 Rationale

The peak flows for the design storms for the post development conditions were derived using

the XP-STORM model set up in accordance with the proposed development layout.

In accordance with the pre development scenario the post developed site was modelled with
the discharge point being the north-eastern environmental drainage area. However no
structures will actually be located within this environmental area. The XP-STORM model was
set up with a preliminary stormwater system design comprising of open bio-retention areas
collecting runoff from carparks and hardstand areas before discharging into a swale along the

eastern boundary.

As a result of the increase in impervious ground areas and defined flow paths, detention of
stormwater will be required to ensure that the development does not increase existing flow
rates at the point of discharge. This storage volume will be achieved by roofwater harvesting
tanks or equivalent with a combined volume of 192kL. These tanks will be located under car

parking areas and will be detailed further in a future operational works application.

An XP-STORM node layout plan for the post-development scenario is included in Appendix
Cc.

6.2 Results

Table 6.1 indicates the greatest peak flows for the post development model.

Table 6.1: Post development peak flows
ARI Design Storm (min) Peak Flow (m’/s)

10 25 0.714
100 25 1.002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As shown in the above table the post-developed flows compare very well to that of pre-
developed. This is due to the stormwater mitigation included in the development in the form of

harvesting tanks. XP-STORM pre development model output is included in Appendix C.

 

BARLOW GREGG VOM M3048
DECEMBER 2007

Page 71

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 8

7.0 Conclusion

In conclusion it should be stated that the findings of this stormwater management plan are that
it is possible to incorporate adequate stormwater detention as part of the proposed

development, to result in non-worsening of stormwater flows.

 

BARLOW GREGG VDM M3048

DECEMBER 2007

Page 72

APPENDIX A
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT

Page 73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

— ‘am
nag

|

a

 

 

 

 

 

ne

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 74

APPENDIX B
XP-STORM PRE-DEVELOPMENT RESULTS

Page 75

000¢ uer
wes}

    

00-2
7-00

pujyiy

 

LO

{ijt

ANZ
OME
WT
MN
AE

[2vS'0 xe] UI Og, eSCON = [ZZ9'0 xe] UI OZ} BSOON

 

 

pid

 

{tit

 

NOl|4

ti

 

fii

 

Litt

 

pitt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

—- —
[6S9'0 xe] ul OG BSCON [Log’o xey] ul og BSsooN [SL2'0 xeW] ul Gp BSOON [0220 Xe] ul OE BSOON
PY [os — —

[L+9°0 xe] ul Gz esooN [g$z'0 xepy] ul OZ BSOON [979'0 xep] ul Gg, esooN [ves o xeyy] uw QO) BSOON
Oh Gk Fah = Se est |

MOLT OLD - Juaudojaaaqg-s1g

Page 76

 

0002 uer

-00

 

LO

 

20

 

€'0

 

v0

 

s‘0

 

90m
o

 

 

 

80

 

60
Ol

 

 

bb
cl

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLLA ETP P EP TT EET ty

 

 

 

[ZZ6'0 xe] Wig BSOON
Bel

[Loz'p xe] uiwigz esoon
ra a a

[0SZ'0 xew] ulupgL SOON

 

——
[PLL Xe] ulLugg BSOON [OOL"| xe] ulwgp esooN
—— —

(ZZ) xeW] ulgz eSooN [8LO") xeyy] ulus, BSOON

MOLI OOLO- Juaudojaaaq-21g

[g99"0 xe] uligZ| BSOON
PC

[gst', xe] ulwog eSooN
—

[L06'0 xeyy] ul | BSOON

 

Page 77

APPENDIX C
XP-STORM POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE
MODEL LAYOUT AND RESULTS

Page 78

 

 

 

 

 

 

LTT

Node30

MTT TT]
Mt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Caain a. mogana FO

 

 

 

Page 79

SUL
00:2 oe:1 00:1 0¢:0

0002 uer

eS |

 

Jj ji

 

 

 

 

 

j_ ij tt

 

) jj

 

} tid

Z

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIL = XeW
MOLT OLD - Juowdojaaaq-3s0d

z

¢

Ss

9°

0

0

0

0

0

MOl|4

Page 80

Ow 000d uer
00:2 O€:L 00-1 0€:0 1S |

 

 

 

 

 

Mo}

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C00 = Xe

8ESPON 9} 9ZSPON WOOL QcxUry] yNpuo+y

Page 81

APPENDIX D
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE DETAILS

Page 82

 

 

 

 

77 PROPOSED LOCATION OF

32kL DETENTION TANKS

INDICATES PROPOSED.
BIGRETENTION AREAS

 

 

 

 

RENE STREET

 

 

    

 

mail
We ULES
tn

PROPOSED LOCATION GF}
3UkL_ RAINWATER t

 

HARVESTING TANKS

PROPOSED LOCATION OF
3kL DETENTION TANKS,

    
    

FS PROPOSED LOCATION OF
32kL RAINWATER
HARVESTING TANKS,

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

|

 

 

 

sou 8 OM Me
—

  

NOTATION

MOKATES STORMWATER
—_ FUBW DRECTON

INDICATES. PROPOSEO

TP BIRE TENTION AREAS.

LOT 3 STORMWATER
FLOW DIRECTION

 

 

eeeemrerer
2 asec cosst mgt st
eee, heen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BARLOW GREGG ViP>mw_

 

 

 

 

 

 

re cor const

fowtas ee vomen cust

 

 

Seen sane

 

 

 

PROJECT oon becenOER THN [wat AS SEH
LOT 3 STORMWATER RETAIL BUSINESS SHOWROOM &[ sexe | ene
FLOW DIRECTION COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OFFICE [== et
Int 26 EENIE CREEK ROAD cc wre
aan OOSAVILLE PROVECT. SUBSET -SHEET REVISION
& ASSOCIATES
ec _ Fax 107) 5443 THE M3048 - SKOS