Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

07/1841 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132007.1841

of 82

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

7. Provide further details of how the conference and gym facility is proposed to be utilised by
the tenants of fhe site, including tifling and confractual arrangements and costing
structures for its use.

The conference and gym facility will not be open to the public and is provided as an ancillary
facility for the industrial tenants. This facility will be managed by the NCTC. The gym will be
open at all times for use by other tenants, whereas the conference/meeting facility will need
to be pre-booked. Titling and contractual arrangements will depend upon whether the site is
developed and retained in a single ownership or subdivided under a community titles scheme.
Costs for use of the facility will be incorporated in either lease agreements or body corporate
fees.

8. Provide a detailed assessment of the adequacy of the carparking facilities provided in
association with the conference and gym facility and provide amended plans indicating
increased parking provision as appropriate.

Given that the conference and gym facility is not open to the public and is provided an as
ancillary use for site tenants, no additional parking demand or provision is generated.

Carparking has been provided as follows, in accordance with the requirements of the
Driveways and Carparking Code:

 

Use Carparking Rate Requirement Provided
Industrial 1 space per 50m? of use | 182 19]
area.

Use area = 9101m?2
Education | space per employee & 5+3=8 10
) space per 10 students of
driving age.

NCTC has 5 staff and 30
students/trainees

 

 

 

 

Total | 190 201

 

 

 

 

 

As demonstrated carparking provision has been provided in excess of the requirements of the
Driveways and Carparking Code.

9. Provide confirmation of the proposal'’s consistency with the various Management Plans
submitted in association with the Reconfiguring of a Lot and Operational Works
applications (2006/1594 & 2007/1242). Where there are conflicts, fhe proposal plans -
and/or management plans shall be amended accordingly and resubmitted, clearly
indicating any changes made.

The proposal does not conflict with the amended Management Plans approved with the Lot
Reconfiguration and Operational Works applications.

10. Provide a Bushfire Management Plan for the site that addresses the proposal. The plan
previously submitted has not considered the proposed development.

An amendment Bushfire Management Plan was prepared and submitted subsequent to the
Operational Works approval for the lot Reconfiguration works. This Bushfire Management Plan
considered the proposed development. A copy of the Plan is attached.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
6.6 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_1841 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 6.6 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.