08/1796 - Preliminary Building Approval - Roofed Patio [As Published] · 172008.1796

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

S ECTIO N 4 Section 4 must be completed when the application seeks approval to cary out o operational work.
IPLANNING SCHEME <<. “Die mhel, GLU EF
41 Is any of the proposed operational work assessable under a planning scheme?
CINo - Goto o42 DYes- (Compete Fort Part E) Answer Os4.1.1 - 4.1.7 below.
'E-CONTROLLED ROAD &
Is any part of the premises located in part oe a future State-controled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?

(No :

if no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, schedule 5 and

does it exceed the threshold?

EINo (7 Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
0 Yes

If yes, is all of the proposed operational work associated with the following?

(i) Ammaterial change of use that is assessable under the planning scheme [No D1 Yes

(li) Reconfiguring a lot that increases the total number of lots, or increases the total number oflots © []No (] Yes :
abutting the State-controlled road |

 

    
 

 

 

 

   
 
 

 

 

 

If no to either or both (i) or (ii) above - Answer (a) - (c) below
(a) Is any of the proposed operational work associated with access to a State-controlled road?
CING Yes - this application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (Mn as Concurenca Agency.
(b) Is any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?

CNo 0 Yes
If yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
No - This application must be referred to. the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency
0 Yes - This'zpplication must be referred to DMA as Advice Agency.

(c) Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land,
through a pipe with a cross-sectional area greater than 625cm? that directs stormwater to a State-controlled road?

CINo (Yes !

H yes, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
Cl No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
O Yes - This application: must be referred to OMA as Advice Agency.

3, tora Heo}

 

    

 

JP PRagulation. schedule 2, able 3, tam 3,1? Ragutation, scheduse 2, table
}ACIO SULFATE SOILS :

41.2 |\s any of the operational w work proposed | ine a local government ar area isted*™ in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and ‘Managing
Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils? '
CINo-dotooss3 (1) Yes

It yes, is the natural ground level of any point where work is being carried out less than 20m AHD?

       

 

CJ No 1 Yes
If yes, does the proposed operational work involve the following? . |
(i) Excavating more than 1,000m° of soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD CINo (1) Yes i

 

(ii) Filling the premises with 1,000m3 or more of material with.an average depth of 0.5mon [JNo [] Yes i
land, soil or sediment at or below 5m AHD

It yes to either or.both (i) or (ii) above - This apptication must to be referred to the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) as
Advice Agancy

IP Asguialion, schadule 2 tebe 3, tem 4; State Pisnning Policy 202: Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Sls, saction 3.6,

 

 

 

 

+1 Aurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, 8undaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Bumett, Caboottura, Caims, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Cooloola, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Miriam Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine
Rivers, Redcliffe, Redtand, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday

Page 27